Results 231 to 240 of 256
Thread: Someone needs to sue the TSA
-
11-24-2010 #231
Re: Someone needs to sue the TSA
Precisely, since the Israelis also possess what are arguably the best army and intelligence service in the world.
Mossad - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:Mossad_seal.png" class="image">
~BB~
-
11-24-2010 #232
-
11-24-2010 #233
Re: Someone needs to sue the TSA
I got a friend who is like that. He is constantly talking about how the government was behind 911 and how the N.W.O is going to take over the world. He occassionally sprouts off about the return of Jesus and whatnot.
People protest when the gov't does nothing, then when the gov't does something. People protest because they do not like what the gov't implemented.
Blood's thicker like a virgin's pussy on Homecoming.
-
11-24-2010 #234
-
11-24-2010 #235
Re: Someone needs to sue the TSA
Blood's thicker like a virgin's pussy on Homecoming.
-
11-24-2010 #236
-
11-24-2010 #237
Re: Someone needs to sue the TSA
The government is behind 9/11, the NWO is coming (EU, AU, soon-to-be NAU, etc). There's evidence to show for each of these allegations. There is, however, no evidence of the second coming of Jesus.
And sometimes the government takes advantage of that line of thinking and doesn't even bother to think things through. Why should they, ya know? People are going to complain regardless, right? So why bother trying?
~BB~
-
11-24-2010 #238
Re: Someone needs to sue the TSA
There's no evidence the U.S. gov't was behind 911 except in kooksville.
-
11-24-2010 #239
Re: Someone needs to sue the TSA
Really? You've always seen 110 story buildings fall straight down as a result of a crash above the 80th floors? No evidence? The video of the controlled demolition is just the tip of the iceberg.
Did you know that Silverstein actually authorized the demolition of WTC7? How could he have done that unless it was already set up for such an event?
~BB~
-
11-24-2010 #240
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Boston
- Posts
- 226
Re: Someone needs to sue the TSA
Bella,
I am a firefighter. I watched the 2nd plane crash into the building live. I had just gotten off shift. Honest to God, my concern after watching the building burn for as long as it did was the risk of collapse.
What I didn't know then, but do know now from watching and reading about the construction was that it was built in a system called truss construction.
Truss construction is popular for several reasons. It's used in a lot of warehouses. Truss construction is strong and allows less material to be used to make it lighter. The major problem with truss construction is that when one truss goes, you will almost 100% of the time, have a complete and utter failure of all the supports. Which is what you saw with the towers.
Steel begins to fail at 1200 degrees F. Its not that it's melting but that means it will twist and contort very quickly at 1200 degrees. With that in mind, the load (weight) of the building wouldnt take long to collapse. An average house fire will reach 1100 degree F in about 3 1/2 minutes.
There was a fire in 1999 in Worcester that killed 6 Firefighers. They said that the temperature in the cold storage warehouse reached 3000 degrees and there was very little material to burn there.
So, how hot do you think it was with a plane full of jet fuel exploding into both towers?
It wasnt a controlled demolition. That's what the conspiracy theorists want you to believe. They try to point out little things that would lend to their crazy ideas.
I cant speak about #7....
Enjoy what you have today...for we know not what tomorrow holds