Someone needs to sue the TSA

[african1]

I am No conspiracy Theorist but these facts are just weird.

[DaveinBoston]

Hey Einstein,

Did you even watch all these videos before you posted them?

For starters, #3 doesnt even work... its been blocked.

Regarding #2, Argenbright was the security company that the terrorists mainly went through...getting on their flights... not Huntleigh USA like the video states. Huntleigh was only doing security for UA flight 175.

Also.. try looking up the stock for ICXT... which is supposedly a company selling scanners.. the company exists.. but no stock symbol.

And your gonna believe that the 'middle eastern man" that the people interviewed saw the head of OSI....HAHAHAHAHAHA....

Bizarre...

I am No conspiracy Theorist but these facts are just weird.

[NYBURBS]

I dont think that it matters that you were on a plane 30 mins earlier over NYC. Does that mean your opinions carry more weight than me because I was just getting home from work when the planes hit?

It's not about adding or detracting weight from your opinion. It's simply pointing out that I've been up close and personal with the "oh shit that could have easily been me" scenario. Yet, I still don't want draconian security policies implemented in response to what happened.

[african1]

Hey Einstein,

Did you even watch all these videos before you posted them?

For starters, #3 doesnt even work... its been blocked.

Regarding #2, Argenbright was the security company that the terrorists mainly went through...getting on their flights... not Huntleigh USA like the video states. Huntleigh was only doing security for UA flight 175.

Also.. try looking up the stock for ICXT... which is supposedly a company selling scanners.. the company exists.. but no stock symbol.

And your gonna believe that the 'middle eastern man" that the people interviewed saw the head of OSI....HAHAHAHAHAHA....

Bizarre...

Since your layoff in 2008, you're the one with enough time to research all these facts.
Nevertheless, you seem to focus on just a small fact in the video and ignore the main one: how come in an after-9/11 environment, they just allow a Nigerian guy (on the terrorist watchlist) to board an International Flight with NO Passport.
Fact 2, don't ignore Chertoff's big gamble (or win) in this venture. Have you seen how he's pushing for its mainstream usage in all aspects of life!!!

The video is not supposed to be a fait accompli, rather I was more interested in the rare news broadcasts accompanying it.

[african1]

Also if the video is not working, maybe it's time to get rid of IE 5. (and 98 SE)

[scroller]

And you get people that piss and moan about walking though a scanner.

I go back to.. take a bus, train, boat or car... problem solved. Why should anyones "convenience" take presidence over my safety?

Man, what a fucking pussy you are. You're at the point where people are literally photographing you naked and jamming their finger up your ass for standard travel arrangements that have existed for 100 years, and you actually defend it. Amazing.

It's not "convenience", it's a right to privacy, and it's supposed to be Constitutionally protected. In fact, it's supposed to be the whole point of the USA. Land of the free and home of the brave and all that -- and in what way do you qualify for those?

[BellaBellucci]

It's not about adding or detracting weight from your opinion. It's simply pointing out that I've been up close and personal with the "oh shit that could have easily been me" scenario. Yet, I still don't want draconian security policies implemented in response to what happened.

Exactly. That's what I was trying to say, but yet I see DaveInBoston has completely missed the point. Hopefully you've articulated it for him better than I did.

Man, what a fucking pussy you are. You're at the point where people are literally photographing you naked and jamming their finger up your ass for standard travel arrangements that have existed for 100 years, and you actually defend it. Amazing.

It's not "convenience", it's a right to privacy, and it's supposed to be Constitutionally protected. In fact, it's supposed to be the whole point of the USA. Land of the free and home of the brave and all that -- and in what way do you qualify for those?

Fucking awesome!

~BB~

PS: Not only do I get paid to do porn as opposed to paying someone else for the privilege, it's really not my issue here. My issue is that our rights are being constantly eroded in the name of anti-terror while the best anti-terror protection we have does not, I repeat, NOT come from the TSA, but the FBI, CIA, NSA (against which I have a similar set of issues), etc.

[joeym75ld]

Man, what a fucking pussy you are. You're at the point where people are literally photographing you naked and jamming their finger up your ass for standard travel arrangements that have existed for 100 years, and you actually defend it. Amazing.

It's not "convenience", it's a right to privacy, and it's supposed to be Constitutionally protected. In fact, it's supposed to be the whole point of the USA. Land of the free and home of the brave and all that -- and in what way do you qualify for those?

Where the hell did you learn about the Constitution? Show me where in the Constitution that is says you have the "right to privacy" pertaining to travel provided by a private institution. Everyone considers themselves Constitutional experts, but have likely never even read the document (probably too busy playing with your Barbies and trying on mommy's panties instead of doing your homework).

What a self-entitled, selfish, little prick you are.

Grow up, and learn that everything is not all about you and your instant gratification.

[joeym75ld]

Man, what a fucking pussy you are. You're at the point where people are literally photographing you naked and jamming their finger up your ass for standard travel arrangements that have existed for 100 years, and you actually defend it. Amazing.

It's not "convenience", it's a right to privacy, and it's supposed to be Constitutionally protected. In fact, it's supposed to be the whole point of the USA. Land of the free and home of the brave and all that -- and in what way do you qualify for those?

FYI, here is what the "whole point of the USA" was, according to the Constitution:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Essentially, the Constitution was primarily about taxation without representation. There are exactly zero refererences to a right to privacy in the original Constitution.

[lisaparadise]

FYI, here is what the "whole point of the USA" was, according to the Constitution:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Essentially, the Constitution was primarily about taxation without representation. There are exactly zero refererences to a right to privacy in the original Constitution.

theres more nutjobs in the states then anywhere in the world period how the hell can you people think its an invasion of your civil rights knowing full well there are terrerist out there who have zero respect for human life and would like nothin more to see you all dead.so freakin what if you have to go through a body scanner it sure as hell beats blowing up in an airplane doesnt it?ask yourselfs this question whats worse you blwing up in a plane or 10 mins going through a scanner because thats what its come down to where are your civil rights then?when your remains are scatters for 100 miles over the oceon.