Someone needs to sue the TSA

[lisaparadise]

Then what's your take on why they go to such lengths to intimidate people into using the scanner? Or why they force them into a pat-down situation even if the decline to get on the plane? How do you account for those policies and the unacceptable behavior of TSA agents towards American citizens?

~BB~

nuke em all i say lol who cares id rather be safe i dont care about a scanner im glad its there,america has far too much to say about there rights its almost laughable you people bitch about everything its crazy be more like canadians we take it up the ass all the time and just say thank you

[BellaBellucci]

nuke em all i say lol who cares id rather be safe i dont care about a scanner im glad its there,america has far too much to say about there rights its almost laughable you people bitch about everything its crazy be more like canadians we take it up the ass all the time and just say thank you

Nukes? Oh, here we go again!

And just because you 'take it up the ass,' that necessitates others having to suffer the same indignities? Misery loves company? Come on babes. You know better.

~BB~

[lisaparadise]

Here we go again!

~BB~

im just messin withh ya beautifull now get on cam so i can play with myself

[BellaBellucci]

im just messin withh ya beautifull now get on cam so i can play with myself

I'm jumping in the shower now... I think. I tend to procrastinate. I'll be in the chat a bit later for a while before I go out.

~BB~

[lisaparadise]

I'm jumping in the shower now... I think. I tend to procrastinate. I'll be in the chat a bit later for a while before I go out.

~BB~

get the fuck in the shower its already past my bedtime woman

[DaveinBoston]

Define irony:

When a pornstar/adult entertainer, who makes money being nude et al... complains and argues that a body scanner that shows a blurry alien like image is invading her rights.

lol

[scubaman]

Define irony:

When a pornstar/adult entertainer, who makes money being nude et al... complains and argues that a body scanner that shows a blurry alien like image is invading her rights.

lol

They get paid to show their bodies.

[NYBURBS]

Ok... lets change the word 'privalege' to the phrase "convenience afforded to you".

You are guaranteed the right to unreasonable search and seizure under the 4th Amendment... but what is considered "unreasonable" 10 years ago is far from unreasonable today.

Would you have thought a small box cutter on a plane would have been such a life-altering device 10 years ago? I can list 3000+ people who wish the airlines did.

10 years ago, no one would have dreamed that someone would pack their shoe or underwear with explosives with the intent on blowing themselves and the plane full of passenger to "Allah".

If mandatory cavity searches were the only way to guarantee my flight was safe... show me where to stand to drop my pants.

Where do you draw the line to guarantee I'm safe?

Why should I have to worry that Ahknahd Towel-head in the seat next to me with fantasies of 72 virgins waiting for him, might be wearing C-4 Fruit of the Looms... because your sensitive about a TSA working who looks at thousands of images a day is looking at your an alien-like image on a body scan machine.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_HBMBWUZ920...255B1%255D.jpg

Like I said... you dont have to take a plane... and you dont have to every worry about the body scan or someone touching you during a pat down.

Pretty plain and simple logic

Bro, I was on a plane on 9/11 and flew over NYC about 30 min before it was hit, but I still don't agree with the solutions being proposed. You're correct that there is a reasonableness standard with the 4th Amendment, but how one interprets that can lead to endless definitions. There is also a warrant requirement that literally does not have an exception built into it, but the courts have interpreted otherwise. At the end of the day though, to continue down this path is to ensure that we give up all of our privacy for a false sense of security. I could give a fuck less that someone sees my dong on a scanner image, but I'm worried that to keep pushing back the line of acceptability will be to allow the government too much of a free hand.

[DaveinBoston]

semantics... she's crying about rights being violate...

[DaveinBoston]

I dont think that it matters that you were on a plane 30 mins earlier over NYC. Does that mean your opinions carry more weight than me because I was just getting home from work when the planes hit?

I have plenty of 6 degrees of seperation alot closer than that! My Dad was on a DC flight early too...my buddy was scheduled for a meeting 9-12 on the top floors of the towers... if the terrorists waited 24 hours, my buddy would be dead... the wife of a guy that I use to work with was a member of the flight crew of Flight 11. She did a swap because her son decided to stay visiting in town a few days longer... otherwise she would be dead.

We arent pushing back the line of accountability.. safety dictates it. 10 years ago, I could bring 4.5 ounces of shampoo in my carry on. Now I can't. OMG... such a inconvenice to buy those little bottles.. and keep them all in a bag so I can take them out and show the TSA. Last trip back from FL, I forgot I had a bottle of sunblock in my carry on... guess where it ended up.. in the trash courtesy of Orlando TSA. No biggy... my bad.

I have a good friend who is a customs agent in Boston. They get hundreds of credible threats weekly that the general public have no idea about. He's always telling me about "Mr-Terrorist-watch-list-guy" who they had to deport and it happens ALL THE TIME. Not once every 6 months.... ALL THE TIME.

The general public would shit themselves if they knew the stuff that gets diverted daily that never gets reported!

And you get people that piss and moan about walking though a scanner.

I go back to.. take a bus, train, boat or car... problem solved. Why should anyones "convenience" take presidence over my safety?

Bro, I was on a plane on 9/11 and flew over NYC about 30 min before it was hit, but I still don't agree with the solutions being proposed. You're correct that there is a reasonableness standard with the 4th Amendment, but how one interprets that can lead to endless definitions. There is also a warrant requirement that literally does not have an exception built into it, but the courts have interpreted otherwise. At the end of the day though, to continue down this path is to ensure that we give up all of our privacy for a false sense of security. I could give a fuck less that someone sees my dong on a scanner image, but I'm worried that to keep pushing back the line of acceptability will be to allow the government too much of a free hand.