Crossdresser, the sexy charm of ambiguity

[MrFanti]

I've posted a few women's Flickr pages in this thread at one point another - which means directly to their picture library.

[MrFanti]

Let's try this again just for fun...
https://www.flickr.com/photos/197162370@N03/

[MrFanti]

Couple more...
https://www.flickr.com/photos/167459094@N07/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jessica-jane/

[marcome2]

Flickr girls are the best!

Can they be posted?

[MrFanti]

https://www.flickr.com/photos/alessiatravestita/
Should hold ya' for a bit....

[drongo]

[filghy2]

We should know if the girl would like...

If they have a pseudonym they've used on a publicly-accessible internet page I think that normally implies consent. It's not as if you are being asked to reveal their true identity.

[marcome2]

If they have a pseudonym they've used on a publicly-accessible internet page I think that normally implies consent. It's not as if you are being asked to reveal their true identity.

I was referring to copyrights
Do you know something?

[filghy2]

I was referring to copyrights
Do you know something?

I'm not an expert in IP law, but in copyright there is a 'fair use' doctrine that allows limited reproduction of material in the public domain without asking permission. That means it's okay to repost one or two photos, as the rules of this forum allow.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use

[Fitzcarraldo]

I was referring to copyrights
Do you know something?

You don't strike me as someone concerned about copyright. You already copy pictures and post them constantly. Withholding the name of the source doesn't give you any protection for violating copyright.