Unclockable Chicks

[stevethesmurf]

Possibly one of the hottest!

[Cereal Escapist]

maybe it is just me, but i would call many girls (but not all) posted here to be extremely clockable.

too many have the telltale signs of transitioning and have facial features concomitant with being born male.

[Gillian]

... too many have the telltale signs of transitioning and have facial features concomitant with being born male.

Concomitant? Get you, fancy pants ...

[lucx]

Ava Thompson Powell

Attachment 1020542Attachment 1020543Attachment 1020544Attachment 1020545Attachment 1020548Attachment 1020547Attachment 1020549Attachment 1020550Attachment 1020551Attachment 1020546

Absolutely wonderful... i would never think she were born with male parts...

[lucx]

Natalie Mars

Attachment 975631Attachment 975632Attachment 975633

Also her totally natural and feminine beauty...

[LilyRox]

maybe it is just me, but i would call many girls (but not all) posted here to be extremely clockable.

too many have the telltale signs of transitioning and have facial features concomitant with being born male.

I mean that's easy to say on a forum about TS, but not in the real world. There's plenty of biological girls that don't look nearly as fem as a lot of these girls. There are a lot of biological girls that have a defined jawline. Just because you can spot a couple minor facial features on a TS website doesn't really mean a lot.

[Gillian]

I mean that's easy to say on a forum about TS, but not in the real world. There's plenty of biological girls that don't look nearly as fem as a lot of these girls. There are a lot of biological girls that have a defined jawline. Just because you can spot a couple minor facial features on a TS website doesn't really mean a lot.

I remember before I first went out dressed in public, I sat in my local mall people watching. The variety in the appearance of all sorts men and women was enough to give me the confidence to take that first step.

I can still remember my first time in town shopping as Gilly. No one batted an eyelid. I can't say whether I was clocked or not but I got no funny remarks and frankly I suspect that nowadays the vast majority couldn't give a shit.

[LilyRox]

I remember before I first went out dressed in public, I sat in my local mall people watching. The variety in the appearance of all sorts men and women was enough to give me the confidence to take that first step.

I can still remember my first time in town shopping as Gilly. No one batted an eyelid. I can't say whether I was clocked or not but I got no funny remarks and frankly I suspect that nowadays the vast majority couldn't give a shit.

Exactly. Jodi Arias is a good example of this from biological girls. She has very defined facial features for a woman, yet no one would ever question her for being a TS (she's not).



You can have slight facial features and still be really passable. The biggest concern in real life are typically height, laryngeal prominence, and voice. Voice can be trained to be convincing if you put enough effort into it unless you have throat issues. Height you just have to be lucky. I'm quite small so I got lucky on that.

The neck can also be easily avoided being detectable by using scarfs.

[Cereal Escapist]

I mean that's easy to say on a forum about TS, but not in the real world. There's plenty of biological girls that don't look nearly as fem as a lot of these girls. There are a lot of biological girls that have a defined jawline. Just because you can spot a couple minor facial features on a TS website doesn't really mean a lot.

Actually, I would argue that because this is a TS site, there are in fact more people prone to say a woman is not clockable because everyone here is sensitive to the topic, whether your association is little more than lurking for free pics or a full on advocate. This is the place where biases would work in both directions.

You also made one assumption in that I was only talking about a girl's jawline. There was a paper a few years ago that actually stated femininity/beauty is as determined by the forehead as it is the lower half of the face. The interplay between the forehead, eyebrow (not the hair itself) but the actual brow's shape and position and a person's hairline will contribute to how feminine a woman is perceived.

Listen, my personal preference are girls that glam their natural looks up with make up only. The object of my obsession right now, Nyxi Leon, I would argue is 100% clockable and I find her incredibly attractive. The point is, clockable is a subjective term and depends on how a person is perceived not how they present themselves.

Finally, the point you make about some cisgender girls not looking as fem as these girls is a very loaded statement. It assumes by its very nature that "fem" is the opposite of "clockable" which it isn't. There are 100s of fem girls in porn that are clearly clockable. The difference to me is that a cisgender girl who does not look as fem as some of the above, don't have to try that hard whereas often times, I think some of the girls above are trying to hard which then puts them in that category of easily clockable.

[CaptainPlanet]

Actually, I would argue that because this is a TS site, there are in fact more people prone to say a woman is not clockable because everyone here is sensitive to the topic, whether your association is little more than lurking for free pics or a full on advocate. This is the place where biases would work in both directions.

You also made one assumption in that I was only talking about a girl's jawline. There was a paper a few years ago that actually stated femininity/beauty is as determined by the forehead as it is the lower half of the face. The interplay between the forehead, eyebrow (not the hair itself) but the actual brow's shape and position and a person's hairline will contribute to how feminine a woman is perceived.

Listen, my personal preference are girls that glam their natural looks up with make up only. The object of my obsession right now, Nyxi Leon, I would argue is 100% clockable and I find her incredibly attractive. The point is, clockable is a subjective term and depends on how a person is perceived not how they present themselves.

Finally, the point you make about some cisgender girls not looking as fem as these girls is a very loaded statement. It assumes by its very nature that "fem" is the opposite of "clockable" which it isn't. There are 100s of fem girls in porn that are clearly clockable. The difference to me is that a cisgender girl who does not look as fem as some of the above, don't have to try that hard whereas often times, I think some of the girls above are trying to hard which then puts them in that category of easily clockable.

100% agree...

Just to chime in majority of the TS I see in Pics are unclockable, but that changes instantly in person almost 50% of the time for me. Although I still find them attractive in most cases, their is always something.