X-critic also against Transsexuals

[tsdvdman]

Back to the original reason for the thread. I think you girls will never truly get taken serious because you don't have anyone at the top seriously advocating for you and your genre. Directors, CEO's, producers, "the suits" will only hear and listen to their peers..people on the same level as they are. I think they see your "reps" as a joke.
Most things get done while "smoozin"...and at extracurricular activities during industry events..etc. It's apparent that the couple of people you rely on to help get your issues addressed and your voices heard are much too busy policing comments on the forums and arguing with members who express opposing views about their websites...everyday..practically every thread.
I know it's hard to swallow ladies (no pun intended)..but think about it...who are the ones that are really getting pimped? It sure aint the one saying "everything is fine".."sales are up".."all my sites are doing well"...
Meanwhile..You are still escorting..WHY?..because the rent still has to get paid

[GroobyKrissy]

You don't know anything about basic research. What you have said is so wrong that it is not funny. Go to a college and tell them that you're comparing two different people in two different types of porn. One in solo and another person in a hardcore. They would tell you that your data does not prove that solo scenes sell better than hardcore scenes.

Has anybody from your production company went to college and taken both Statistics and Methods of Research courses?

Just stop with your REALLY annoying smugness about how "educated" you are. If you really want me to, I'll go through most any thread you've posted in and point out every grammatical error, word mis-usage, spelling mistake, and of course, GAPS IN LOGIC.

Consider just this Mr. Census:
You do the exact same thing that you accuse Wendy of doing, a point which I already made when we first tangled. It could be argued that when you compare a site like, say, TS Seduction and a site like, say, Shemale Yum; you're data is invalid. The sites are branded differently, use different stars, are marketed differently... in fact, just about everything about them is different!

OK, with long fingernails and a tablet keyboard that only took me fifteen minutes to type ��

[TSPornFan]

Just stop with your REALLY annoying smugness about how "educated" you are. If you really want me to, I'll go through most any thread you've posted in and point out every grammatical error, word mis-usage, spelling mistake, and of course, GAPS IN LOGIC.

Consider just this Mr. Census:
You do the exact same thing that you accuse Wendy of doing, a point which I already made when we first tangled. It could be argued that when you compare a site like, say, TS Seduction and a site like, say, Shemale Yum; you're data is invalid. The sites are branded differently, use different stars, are marketed differently... in fact, just about everything about them is different!

OK, with long fingernails and a tablet keyboard that only took me fifteen minutes to type ��

I'm just going to say this. You're very stupid. I'm not doing the same thing that Wendy did. I compared two companies' video quality. The samples are videos. Video quality and harcore/solo scenes are two different things. You can't compare them in the same manner. Wendy is improperly comparing solo dvds and hardcore dvds. Her sample has a major flaw. Neither dvd contains the same people. A correct sample must have the same girls in the solo dvd and in the hardcore dvd.

Please go to college. You're stupid.

[GroobySteven]

Back to the original reason for the thread. I think you girls will never truly get taken serious because you don't have anyone at the top seriously advocating for you and your genre. Directors, CEO's, producers, "the suits" will only hear and listen to their peers..people on the same level as they are. I think they see your "reps" as a joke.
Most things get done while "smoozin"...and at extracurricular activities during industry events..etc. It's apparent that the couple of people you rely on to help get your issues addressed and your voices heard are much too busy policing comments on the forums and arguing with members who express opposing views about their websites...everyday..practically every thread.
I know it's hard to swallow ladies (no pun intended)..but think about it...who are the ones that are really getting pimped? It sure aint the one saying "everything is fine".."sales are up".."all my sites are doing well"...
Meanwhile..You are still escorting..WHY?..because the rent still has to get paid

Oh dear, you're back. I assume you are talking about myself? FYI - I'm the only non-TS producer/company owner who has any say at that level. The only one invited on panels, the only one asked for advice on the TS genre and the only one who knows anybody relevant in mainstream.
Why is that?
It's because I also the only one who advocates having open forums for discussion of TS porn in general, their own product, transgender lifestyle/politics and their websites. Don't try and twist your own personal prejudices against me to anything other than exactly what they are.

[GroobySteven]

I'm just going to say this. You're very stupid. I'm not doing the same thing that Wendy did. I compared two companies' video quality. The samples are videos. Video quality and harcore/solo scenes are two different things. You can't compare them in the same manner. Wendy is improperly comparing solo dvds and hardcore dvds. Her sample has a major flaw. Neither dvd contains the same people. A correct sample must have the same girls in the solo dvd and in the hardcore dvd.

Please go to college. You're stupid.

You're WRONG. Listen to the producers. Solo sets in websites do sell. I have the stats on sites containing the same models in both hardcore and solo. Hardcore sells also but don't be such a self-obsessed ass, to think that what you say has any basis in fact, other than your own personal preferences and opinion.

[GroobyKrissy]

Back to the original reason for the thread. I think you girls will never truly get taken serious because you don't have anyone at the top seriously advocating for you and your genre. Directors, CEO's, producers, "the suits" will only hear and listen to their peers..people on the same level as they are. I think they see your "reps" as a joke.
Most things get done while "smoozin"...and at extracurricular activities during industry events..etc. It's apparent that the couple of people you rely on to help get your issues addressed and your voices heard are much too busy policing comments on the forums and arguing with members who express opposing views about their websites...everyday..practically every thread.
I know it's hard to swallow ladies (no pun intended)..but think about it...who are the ones that are really getting pimped? It sure aint the one saying "everything is fine".."sales are up".."all my sites are doing well"...
Meanwhile..You are still escorting..WHY?..because the rent still has to get paid

Really great view of the girls you have there.

I understand what you're saying though and would partially agree...a very, very tiny part. The bigger problem is guys (such as yourself I'd assume based on previous conversations) who think that all girls in porn are stupid fluffs who deserve what they get. You're a consumer (assuming) but unwilling to actually take a stand when it comes to any type of topic with some actual seriousness to it. If all the guys who actually consumed TS porn were to write letters to companies such as those mentioned here, instead of the girls having to do it themselves, these issues would easily be things of the past. So, let's get down to what is really 'hard to swallow'... most consumers of TS porn are too wrapped up in their own insecurities, and too busy hiding in the shadows to do any of the girls any good.

[TSPornFan]

You're WRONG. Listen to the producers. Solo sets in websites do sell. I have the stats on sites containing the same models in both hardcore and solo. Hardcore sells also but don't be such a self-obsessed ass, to think that what you say has any basis in fact, other than your own personal preferences and opinion.

I won't listen to producers until they properly compare the data. There are far too many issues with your samples and how you are comparing the two.

[TSPornFan]

Oh dear, you're back. I assume you are talking about myself? FYI - I'm the only non-TS producer/company owner who has any say at that level. The only one invited on panels, the only one asked for advice on the TS genre and the only one who knows anybody relevant in mainstream.
Why is that?
It's because I also the only one who advocates having open forums for discussion of TS porn in general, their own product, transgender lifestyle/politics and their websites. Don't try and twist your own personal prejudices against me to anything other than exactly what they are.

Interesting.............why haven't SMC's owner and Shemale Stroker's own been invited to these panels? They've been a while for a long time as well and have success.

[WendyWilliams]

Franklin this is the last time I respond to you as Im blocking you so I don't feel obligated to respond. I have a BA degree in Marketing/Communications and worked for the IRS for 4 years before transitioning so I am far from stupid.

I simply said that my solo DVD series SALES, nothing less and nothing more.

[GroobyKrissy]

I'm just going to say this. You're very stupid. I'm not doing the same thing that Wendy did. I compared two companies' video quality. The samples are videos. Video quality and harcore/solo scenes are two different things. You can't compare them in the same manner. Wendy is improperly comparing solo dvds and hardcore dvds. Her sample has a major flaw. Neither dvd contains the same people. A correct sample must have the same girls in the solo dvd and in the hardcore dvd.

Please go to college. You're stupid.

I'm very well educated, thank you very much. Unlike you, I don't have to prove it by putting other people down.

The stupidity lies in the fact that you cannot take a simple line of reasoning and apply it to yourself. THAT is true stupidity.

Wendy's point is NOT flawed for the very (I thought) simple reason that she is speaking of RAW sales numbers...something which seems to have floated right over that thick head of yours. It was not a statement of 'better', it was empirical data that she has firsthand knowledge of.... where is your firsthand knowledge? You're taking her statements and attacking her data based upon a flawed argument from the start since you obviously didn't understand her original point. Probably couldn't see past that diploma hanging in your way.