French suspect showed no sign of militant leanings

[russtafa]

Russtafa wrote: "i hope stavros,prospero and the gang jump on a plane to save the poor unfortunate lol
__________________ It seems in his book that a man murdering Afghan women and children in their beds in Afghanistan is fine but a similar crime in Europe is not. BOTH are 100 per cent wrong Russ - old chap. Your hate blinds you. You really are such a simple minded man.

you really are such weak man no heart =i'm coming over to your place on holiday and chuck you out in the street and i reckon you would not stop me yah pussy .i don't think you have any balls yah girl.if you rocked up to my door i would be calling an ambulance for you as a good christian

[russtafa]

i am still waiting for Europe to go up like a bomb with it's huge muslim populations= time will tell !

[Stavros]

Time has already told. One of bin Laden's aims with his 'spectacular' events was to galvanise the Muslim populations of Europe and North America, 'dazzled' by what bin Laden believed his style of politics could achieve. What did it achieve? Nothing.

Al-Qaeda as an organisation was split between those who were opposed to activities outside the Muslim world, and those who wanted it to go international; the 'base of the base' in Afghanistan was dispersed, further weakening the organisation. In Saudi Arabia and across the Middle East, including in Iran, 9/11 was condemned. As an advertisement for Islam, it was as disastrous as the hijacking in the 1970s by Palestinian fringe groups proved disastrous at the time for the Palestinian cause.

The Provisional IRA had already shown that even though they did find willing recruits for a campaign of violence in the 1970s and 1980s, they never found enough, because in Ireland the majority of the population, north and south of the border, Catholic and Protestant, rejected precisely the kind of political violence advocated by the various forms the IRA has taken since it was officially banned by the Dublin govt in 1936.

Yes, there have been a few Muslims who took up the cause in Europe and North America. For the most part they were amateur outfits without access to the cash and communications networks bin Laden has used, which collapsed after 9/11; and yes there will be the odd nutcase or cell who thinks shooting people dead or putting a bomb in a disco is an achievement.

Russtafa, Musstafa, if this explosion of violence was going to happen on the scale you dream about, it would have happened already. Muslims reject it, they don't want to be a part of it, all you need to do is accept it and move on. Toulouse proves how feeble the organisation is, even if it is a gim reminded that one man and a gun can cause immense damage and heartache.

Threatening Prospero is childish from a man of your age.

[Prospero]

Russtafa - your remarks are just pathetic and beneath contempt. Grow a brain.

[Dino Velvet]

Who decides what's hateful or terror related?
http://www.rt.com/news/merah-sarkozy...-toulouse-200/

[Stavros]

Who decides what's hateful or terror related?
http://www.rt.com/news/merah-sarkozy...-toulouse-200/

Governments do -with the obvious problem that Government A will place Group X on its list of Terrorist groups, while Government B does not, and Government C either overtly or covertly funds the same group. Hate is possibly even more elusive than terrorism as a category, given that there are some social scientists who don't think terrrorism exists, and class what most people call terrorists, as soldiers engaged in a war of their own invention. But hate...that is a tough one, what a fundamentalist Christian thinks is hate might be rational to an atheist and so on. How Sarkozy could even implement such a 'law' I dont know, it could just be knee-jerk reaction, as happens when some nutter kills someone and claims he was inspired by a video game and people then want to ban video games.

[Dino Velvet]

Governments do -with the obvious problem that Government A will place Group X on its list of Terrorist groups, while Government B does not, and Government C either overtly or covertly funds the same group. Hate is possibly even more elusive than terrorism as a category, given that there are some social scientists who don't think terrrorism exists, and class what most people call terrorists, as soldiers engaged in a war of their own invention. But hate...that is a tough one, what a fundamentalist Christian thinks is hate might be rational to an atheist and so on. How Sarkozy could even implement such a 'law' I dont know, it could just be knee-jerk reaction, as happens when some nutter kills someone and claims he was inspired by a video game and people then want to ban video games.

Possibly could depend on the ideology of the man/woman in charge deciding what is hateful or threatening to the people or they themselves. Controversy and free thought can be corralled as hateful or insane.

[buttslinger]

Who decides what's hateful or terror related?

two words: jack bauer

[russtafa]

stavros get that place cleaned up for me and your stuff packed for when i move in

[russtafa]

stavros talks pussy shit. Every time there is a terrorist plot in Europe is proof things are not right and i think there would be plenty of them