I'm putting together a new Facebook group in which hot topics can be debated understandingly and respectfully. If you'd like to request to join, please visit us here:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/transintellectuals/
Thanks!
~BB~
Printable View
I'm putting together a new Facebook group in which hot topics can be debated understandingly and respectfully. If you'd like to request to join, please visit us here:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/transintellectuals/
Thanks!
~BB~
Quote:
Originally Posted by BellaBellucci
I'd suggest you ask Franklin to be honorary president, Bella.... :whistle:
What's his Facebook name? :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by robertlouis
~BB~
Six letters, begins with "w", ends in "r". Think British.Quote:
Originally Posted by BellaBellucci
And no, it isn't Winner. :dancing:
Does it rhyme with "banker?"
___deadQuote:
Originally Posted by robertlouis
Yes, and interestingly enough, they're synonyms too.Quote:
Originally Posted by maxpower
I humbly apologise for hijacking your serious thread right from the start, Ms Bellucci, and now abjectly withdraw.
Carry on.
Or you could ask Freddie Gomez.......
I can see what you are trying to do but I think you have a basic problem.
The words "trans" and "intellectuals" just don't fit together.
Trans people can be very intellectual, or not, just like non-trans people.
The trouble is, most non-trans people who are into trans are less like trans intellectuals, and more like trans droolers. As this thread has already demonstrated.
Seriously?Quote:
Originally Posted by iagodelgado
~BB~
Yup.
Transladyboys.com
Thread 1. Would you suck cock? Response = 93% said yes.
Thread 2. Would you ever suck a guy's cock? 59% = yes. 2% = already have. 15% say maybe.
You want intellectual out of this lot? Cock, cock, cock. Forget the rest.
That's not me. That's reality.
Quote:
Originally Posted by iagodelgado
Um, so liking different forms of sex somehow means that you can't be "intellectual"?
Bollocks.
Some of the randiest people I've ever known, both male and female, have been high-flying academics, and they've been straight, gay, lesbian, bisexual, you name it.
And a liking for transsexual sex isn't any different. Who says you can't do differential calculus or conjugate greek verbs while having a 69 with a lovely tgirl?
Just where did you get this crap from?
Good post Robert. I think that's why Bella asked him if he was serious first. Hard to believe someone could write something that idiotic.
1. the forum would be for those trans who enjoy discussing important issues intelligently. Many qualify.
2. Yes, sucking cock is uncorrelated with intelligence. It is however correlated with swollen tonsils;
You guys are right, but read closer. The point was that he contradicted himself as well. :lol:
~BB~
Meh, I've met some people here who have decent careers and / or are pretty intelligent (like danthepoetman is clever :).
Liking sex or watching porn or whatever else doesn't make you stupid. Just people in general aren't so smart :P Take ANY group of people and you will find most don't have a lot going on (even in groups you would assume they are intelligent by the very work they do).
You can learn knowledge, you can't learn intelligence :|
Shouldn't that be "read more closely", Bella?Quote:
Originally Posted by BellaBellucci
Just showing my intellectual credentials. :whistle:
*inspects nails in a supercilious manner*
Indeed, it should. Thank you. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by robertlouis
~BB~
Thank YOU.Quote:
Originally Posted by BellaBellucci
In which case, do I qualify, or are there elections? :whistle:
You can be chairman of pedantry Robert.
Thank you, but that honour is surely in Bella's gift.Quote:
Originally Posted by broncofan
And chairman is usually an ex officio role. Board member with special responsibility for pedantry would seem more appropriate.
I trust you can see what I'm doing here, Bronco..... :dancing:
I happen to know for a fact that at least one percent of people are in the top one percent of intelligence. That's one out of a hundred people are smarter than the other 99 out of a hundred people.;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Rabbiteyes
I think I do. You're only making yourself seem more qualified for the role. You must really want it bad(ly). Chairman with special responsibility for pedantry looks great on the resume..errr did I screw that up somehow?Quote:
Originally Posted by robertlouis
I don't Facebook :(
This is a very good point. An IQ test breaks down a person's intelligence based on their age. You can be a field farmer and have very high intelligence (IQ), yet never finished high school. Just because someone has gotten multiple degree's doesn't make their IQ above average either. An IQ test primarily breaks down a person's thought process, how they view problems, and relate things that aren't always easily relatable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rabbiteyes
1) Did you read the post where I said trans-people, and trans-admirers, can be intelligent or not?Quote:
Originally Posted by robertlouis
2) My source was transladyboys.com. That's why I said my example was from transladyboys.com.
3) A serious topic was raised. Then entered King Quipper. Ignoring posts that didn't fit his argument and starting a pissing contest.
4) Here's source #2. HungAngels. Top 10 favourite threads. Do you remember that thread? How many were intellectual? None? Really?
5) Source #3. HungDevils. It has a section for "intellectual" although its actual title is "Real Trans Issues". The activity is pretty close to zero. But the main forum has a decent turnover, not of trans intellectual, but of more or less the same stuff that powers HA i.e. porn.
I suspect that "trans intellectual" will be deader than "Real Trans Issues" within about a month. The porn threads will go marching on.
If transsexuals are no more or less intelligent than anyone else, there's no reason to believe a page where they discuss serious issues will be any less successful than one hosting those who are not transsexual. Being no more or less intelligent means they will have a normal proportion of interesting people who can engage one another on these subjects.
Your argument doesn't hold water. Interest in sex does not negate interest in other subjects.
And as for those transsexuals who have engaged in the politics and religion section of the forum, they have always given as good as they get (no pun intended). This part of the forum is geared towards sexual issues so it's no surprise that that's what you see the most of.
My problem is will folks be anonymous...if they don't have their real pictures HERE, why would they have them THERE?
I'll check out the page none the less.
And judging by the group of girls we have here, I actually believe that for whatever reason they are smarter than average. My assumption was only for illustrative purposes.
The Cos has spoken!Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben in LA
Lol...jus kiddin man, your punim has been all over the place,,,
I think this is a great idea, would it be possible to also start a sub section or thread on HA?
It's already there, called Politics and Religion, but apparently some people would prefer to send it to the Facebook ghetto -I mean, what intelligent person bothers with Facebook?
Kindly read the posts. I have no reason whatsoever to believe that I am more intelligent than someone who is transsexual. Zero. Nada. Nothing. THAT is where is where I started.Quote:
Originally Posted by broncofan
THEN I went on to point out that if people want to get intellectual about trans folks then a) a porn forum like HA isnīt going to cut the mustard because it is full of cock-hounds, and more importantly b) a Facebook forum isn't going to fly. UNFORTUNATELY, the vast ranks of cock-hounds don't give a fuck about what it is like to be trans in real life. Just as long as she has a cock.
It's not intellectualism about being trans. It's a group of intellectual trans people. Your insistence on making this about orientation and gender (despite repeatedly having it pointed out to you that it's not) leads me to believe that you might be one of those cock hounds.Quote:
Originally Posted by iagodelgado
Good day, sir.
Apparently, none. :yayo:Quote:
Originally Posted by Stavros
Except that we're already up to 65 members.
~BB~
Agreed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stavros
Good luck, see you in a month? Jesus, I do really, really old stuff on HD and I get bucket-loads of hits.
Head -to - head figures?
I knew FB was doomed as soon as all my middle aged buddies joined in a futile effort to monitor the activities of their teenaged daughters. now I'm reading how kids are leaving in hordes because too many parents are following their pages.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stavros
Good. More bandwidth for us. #gotdamnkids #getoffmylawnQuote:
Originally Posted by flabbybody
~BB~
So true, I have to watch who I friend now because so many of my Family I made the mistake of friending, I don't even like my family :hide-1: JK.Quote:
Originally Posted by flabbybody
But I did friend a guy from work and all he did was curse and say stuff way out of line, I defriended him but he did damage before I had the chance. Asshole cursed out my sister and called her a cunt, not good thanksgiving conversation.
But back on topic, I think people misunderstand porn and intellectuals, though history many of the top minds were perverts, I found this list of 13, how they forgot my favorite Slick Willie, Bill Clinton. Can someone pass me a cigar. I think 95% of the people on this forum would be unable to hold a conversation with these, I am not one of the 5% either.
13 Perverts
Well that could be because lots of true geniuses are very eccentric and anti-social. My favorite is Nikola Tesla.
http://io9.com/5648455/the-mad-scien...e-nikola-tesla
Facebook + intellectualism
does not compute