Results 61 to 70 of 81
-
08-15-2007 #61
Originally Posted by Vicki Richter
snɯıʇdo snʇoʇ soʌ oloʌ
-
08-16-2007 #62
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 527
Re: I see...
Originally Posted by Marilyn
-
08-16-2007 #63
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 527
Originally Posted by peggygee
-
08-16-2007 #64
trap! ^_^
-
08-16-2007 #65
-
08-16-2007 #66
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Burninating the country side.
- Posts
- 1,609
Originally Posted by meghanchavalier
Hey, I like that.
Would tripod also count for correct terminology?
Burninating the country side, burninating the peasants. Burninating all the people in their thatched roof cottages....THATCHED ROOF COTTAGES!!!!!
-
09-04-2007 #67
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 47
Dickgirls refers to hermaphrodites. But since they don't exist, the real life analogy would be shemales. There's also intersexed people, which are closer, but are rare and even rarer in porn.
-
09-04-2007 #68
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Location
- Southern California
- Posts
- 4,894
I've reread the first post of this thread and that has to be the most ignorant, insensitive, and selfish slop of a post this forum has had since it was posted some five years ago. I mean, how does one arrive at such a narrow point of view about what is or isn't right for someone else's life, particularly when looked through the narrow prism of one's livelihood and how much money they can make? Was that all GUEST was capable of seeing? Talk about not seeing the forest for the trees(cocks).
The one that needs to WAKE UP was the original poster of this thread.
-
02-08-2008 #69
Originally Posted by M77
giants!!!!!!!!!
GOOD THINGS
-
02-08-2008 #70
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 1,245
I think all this thread shows is that the OP is a complete cock bandit.
Victoria Saenz operation proves his argument completely wrong:
http://www.hungangels.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=29408
She, without a doubt, looks 100% GG.