Results 281 to 290 of 361
Thread: Kimber James post op?
-
07-01-2013 #281
3 out of 3 members liked this post.Texas's Sweetest Transsexual Superstar™
www.MissLexiWade.com
www.twitter.com/MissLexiWade
BOOKINGS/APPEARANCES: misslexiwade@yahoo.com
-
07-01-2013 #282
Re: Kimber James post op?
Most gg's aren't tiny lol
Most girls are bigger than me when I'm at clubs and she was most likely wearing heels..Kimber always wears heels..
5 to 7 inch ones
as well as most girls do..
And Kimber when I knew her was a twig..she was so tiny..so I don't know what you are talking about..are you sure it was the real Kimber James lol
did you see her barefoot?
This is us in 2008 around the time both of us began with SMC
3 out of 3 members liked this post.Last edited by MrsKellyPierce; 07-01-2013 at 09:55 PM.
My official Adult Blog
http://www.kellypierceblog.com
My Official Blog for my TS Sisters
http://www.secretkelly.com
My official Cam Site
http://www.kellysdreamhouse.com
-
07-01-2013 #283
2 out of 3 members liked this post.
-
07-01-2013 #284
Re: Kimber James post op?
-
07-01-2013 #285
Re: Kimber James post op?
And Donkey I am 5'4 I was wearing heels here and as were Jesse and Miss Felicia
This also was from 2008
Kimber is shorter than me so she has to be around 5'1 to 5'2
Foxxy and I also did a scene together I didn't tower her but she is 5'2 as well
and shorter than me
You must either be blind or a midget
And here is us on the set of Maury Povich most of the girls were taller than us and they were either 5'6 to 58
FEMALES NOT TS
1 out of 2 members liked this post.Last edited by MrsKellyPierce; 07-01-2013 at 10:19 PM.
My official Adult Blog
http://www.kellypierceblog.com
My Official Blog for my TS Sisters
http://www.secretkelly.com
My official Cam Site
http://www.kellysdreamhouse.com
-
07-01-2013 #286
Re: Kimber James post op?
Can I just point out that while petite girls are lovely, tall girls are no less feminine or sexy? It is an absolute standard for catwalk models that they be no less than 5'8" and and has been for years-- and believe me, these days, that's short.
All this whole fucking thread is about is cock and cockhoundery, it's that simple, and some really offensive things have been said by the aforementioned. Transwomen are easily capable of being as attractive as the most beautiful cis-women. Not all are , but then again, not all cis-women are, either.
The men (I use the word only in its strictest biologocal sense) who are deliberately insulting transwomen in this thread, have said things I do not believe for one minute they'd say to a cis-woman, and you know why? They don't think transwomen are women. But of course, they don't WANT a woman, they just want a guy who looks like one.
Plus ca change, ay?
3 out of 4 members liked this post.Last edited by MacShreach; 07-01-2013 at 10:38 PM.
-
07-01-2013 #287
Re: Kimber James post op?
I remember that night!
Even though I'm one of the few who have actually SEEN both the true measurements of the gals in question AND have actually interacted with them during their "off-time" (i.e., they weren't glammed up with heels, hair, and makeup), Steven (who is required by law to keep certain things on file) is spot on.
C'mon...EVERYONE knows how tiny Foxxy is. Kimber is shorter than me even in those heels she wears...and I'm 5'8".
I appreciate the interaction, though!
2 out of 2 members liked this post.
-
07-02-2013 #288
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Posts
- 5,718
Re: Kimber James post op?
I always tried to keep an open mind and a positive attitude towards all opinions, here on HA. I was surprised at times by some of the girls' statements as to how some guys are "chasers", "cock hounds", and only interrested in their cocks and are not at all into them as girls. I often felt it was a bit of an extreme reaction. But with time, reading post after post from some guys here, reading the complete, utter absurdities Imperial and Donkey (or xybar5...) are writing on this thread, I must admit I have come to fully understand their point of view! Donkey and Imperial, you are gay! You're both homosexual men who are hiding, probably to yourself, your own sexual orientation. You try to conceal your desire for cocks behind the fact that it is attached to a woman's body. Find a little courage, guys: admit to yourself that you're gay, and stop bashig t-girls because of your frustrated desires. There's nothing wrong with being gay. But dumping on others simply because you can't accept yourself is disgusting.
You have to realize, if you don't, that what you're implying both, here, is that no transsexual woman can ever, ever equal in beauty a g-woman. Her "body features", as one or both of you said, will always remain too masculine to compete with that of "natural" women... This is such a dumb and gay appreciation it's beyond words. It's on the contrary so obvious that this view is only influenced by a frustration at the perspective of one of them loosing what is the most important part of themselves in your eyes, her cock.
If you had an once of heterosexuality in you, you could EASILY see how moronic and off mark your remarks are about these girls. But you just can't! If you weren't closet homos, you could EASILY have a simple look around at women (you know? these beings you don't desire because they don't have a cock) and see how desirable any of the tgirls you mentioned here are, whether they have a cock or not.
Moreover, I suspect you must be a couple of gay kids, as only kids are unable to fully appreciate women's beauty in its diversity and charm. It has been shown by numerous studies indeed that only very young men (or very old) cannot appreciate women outside of very rigid sets of subjective criteria, and therefore aren't capable of real hetero desire. Not only do you fit such profile, but on top of it you demand a cock as another criterion!!
In fact, I'm thinking you two guys must be virgins, in all probability! You check out porn on the net, you wander here and there, never had any experience and figure things in your mind, mannage to imagine that surely, you're not gay since the cocks you desire so much belongs to women! Don't you, guys?
Get a life, you creeps! Accept who and what you are! It's that simple.
And once more, one thing shouldn't be so difficult to understand, here, you are on a site featuring transsexual women, a site where we celebrate them; the least you can do, the human minimum, the simple politeness and decency, would be to not insult them, wouldn't it? If you don't have anything positive to say, JUST MOVE ON!
3 out of 5 members liked this post.Last edited by danthepoetman; 07-02-2013 at 01:04 AM.
-
07-02-2013 #289
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Posts
- 1,387
Re: Kimber James post op?
^ I'm not bashing anyone. I'm just trying to keep the discussion grounded in reality, which is quite a task around here sometime.
Call me gay if you like. That does not bother me, as I'm not insecure about who I am or what I am attracted to. You are the only one here using inflammatory, homophobic language, so maybe you should heed your own advice...and JUST MOVE ON from this discussion.
2 out of 5 members liked this post.
-
07-02-2013 #290
Re: Kimber James post op?
Reality is subjective....I've read the post on this thread and its really sad how so called "admirers" can be so transphobic.
My loved ones see me as and respects me as a woman, that's beyond good enough for me.who cares what some fucktards on the internet think.they have no bearing on our real lives
6 out of 9 members liked this post.
Similar Threads
-
Kimber James Top
By TSPornFan in forum The HungAngels ForumReplies: 38Last Post: 12-01-2012, 07:47 PM -
where as my post gone about kimber james
By chippy in forum The HungAngels ForumReplies: 2Last Post: 11-08-2012, 03:43 PM -
Does Kimber James post on this forum?
By testtickle in forum The HungAngels ForumReplies: 1Last Post: 11-09-2011, 07:15 AM -
Where is Kimber James?
By precision11 in forum The HungAngels ForumReplies: 3Last Post: 05-12-2008, 02:40 PM