Own a Assault Weapon? soon the Sheriff will be at your home

[my my my!]

Someone certainly does. I never said everyone does. That would be a generalization. Nevertheless, it remains the case that what distinguishes a gun from an automatic ball thrower is the former was designed to kill, the latter was not.

Someone certainly does? show proof. you're just making up stuff, and you did do the generalization of jacking off for non-hunters .

the evidence is against it

the proof is in your posts of you contradicting your own statements. you just don't realize it.

Yet one designer can patent a single design, have two guns built exactly in accord with that design and yet one will be used to kill and the other solely for target shooting. Two guns built in accordance with one design. It is a bit sophomoric to keep insisting that guns are not designed for killing.
It is actually sophomoric to insist that guns are designed only for killing, if that was the case they wouldn't sell them to people. But they do, because they know most can handle them responsibly.

Well, I would scratch the phrase "in essence 'picking' what people use or deserve," ('cause the essence of picking what people use is actually picking what people use) but other than that you got it. All us have only our own experiences and beliefs to go on (as long as "experiences" is interpreted broadly; so as for example to include our conversation here).
you say people don't NEED full autos(i agree) and semi autos (disagree). That's your belief. Just because you and I think they don't NEED doesn't mean the shouldn't be able to buy them.

Later
Bye Trish ttyl

[trish]

I said semi-automatics were designed to kill, not butcher targets and give erections. If you think this logically implies all target shooters get erections, then you need a lesson in logic as well as physiology. I used the "jerkoff metaphor" for target shooting with a semi-automtic (not as you say, for non-hunters). Sorry but target shooting with semi-automatics is not a sport. You do it for the kick, not the challenge. There is no challenge. Sorry, if I implied the kick is sexual. But if your posting about guns on a Tgirl web site, one has a right to wonder.

There is as yet no evidence that you understand logic of any kind, let alone what constitutes a contradiction.

Belief based on evidence is all anybody has.

[hippifried]

I wrote a long sarcastic piece, but it got too personal so I deleted it.
The gist was that being the Policemen of the World, and maintaining prisons and mental facilities costs tons of money, and is costing the average American more than they're getting back, there are hidden taxes everywhere, and the 1950s family is shot to hell, girls have to work 50 hour weeks too, so they can have two hours of peace a day in front of the TV. Money = Freedom It's not the Mitt Romneys that are shooting people, it's the people that have been pushed to the limit. And that's getting to be more and more people.

Huh? What limit? By whom? You're not really trying to claim that these terrorists are actually the victims here, are you? Which of those assholes was economically challenged or stressed? Colorado theater guy? How about the macho epitome of bravery in Newtown? I guess it was the Sikhs who cleaned out that dude's bank account & pushed him over the edge to go shoot up their temple during service. Hmmmm... Nah. More likely is that he didn't like the price of gas that day, & was just too stupid to know the difference between Sikhs & Muslims. A rag head's a rag head, right? & that's real important because... Well... It's not the Romneys or their ilk who are pocketing that extra 5 cents at the pump while convincing this genius to be a terrorist...

There's no economic spin to be had here.

[my my my!]

I said semi-automatics were designed to kill, not butcher targets and give erections. If you think this logically implies all target shooters get erections, then you need a lesson in logic as well as physiology. I used the "jerkoff metaphor" for target shooting with a semi-automtic (not as you say, for non-hunters). Sorry but target shooting with semi-automatics is not a sport. You do it for the kick, not the challenge. There is no challenge. Sorry, if I implied the kick is sexual. But if your posting about guns on a Tgirl web site, one has a right to wonder.



Again, for the semi autos, it may not be(or you do not consider it) a challenge or sport to you, but it is to others. Who are you to make the assumption that there is no challenge? Competitive shooters will tell you otherwise.

Posting on a tgirl forum's "politics and religion" section is why we avoid the sexual aspect of this subject. smh...

There is as yet no evidence that you understand logic of any kind, let alone what constitutes a contradiction.
There is no evidence that you yourself understand logic as you have failed to recognize previous examples of logical analgoies, your previous posts are proof of that. You have yet to recognize the contradictions (now it's multiple) in your own posts.

Belief based on evidence is all anybody has.
This is true to a logic based belief, but to the passion based belief, evidence is ignored or not sought after resulting in what others see as spectacular or ludicrous beliefs.

[trish]

I don't mind being accused (as you did) of basing my position on my beliefs and experiences. You may ignore all the evidence you like in the name of your passion. I will continue to examine and analyze all of it. To now turn around and accuse me of doing otherwise would involve you in a contradiction.

[my my my!]

I don't mind being accused (as you did) of basing my position on my beliefs and experiences. You may ignore all the evidence you like in the name of your passion. I will continue to examine and analyze all of it. To now turn around and accuse me of doing otherwise would involve you in a contradiction.

What evidence? That in your opinion since guns were originally designed to kill that's all they STILL are? Yea, that's some really good evidence...

I personally have only stated fact that you choose to ignore because of YOUR passionate beliefs.

If anyone is talking through passion and not analyzing , it is you.

[trish]

my my my, aren't we all in a passion?

[buttslinger]

Huh? What limit? By whom? You're not really trying to claim that these terrorists are actually the victims here, are you?

No no, hipster, my writing skills .....sigh...

I'm saying when gun laws are enforced, who do you think pays for it? YOU DO!! I'm talking real money. Goods and Services. Actual cash from your pocket.Do you really want to foot the bill to put a bunch of stupid crackers in jail?

[my my my!]

my my my, aren't we all in a passion?

Kind of, I heart <3 you

[martin48]

That's OK then - all kiss and makeup. You get to keep your automatic weapons