Men on dating ts women

[KittyPride]

How about the Boogyman?

Not real..... even the boogyman is bottom nowadays.

[italianamerican25]

The funny thing about this is they are now starting to speculate that it is possible there is another primate out there that is smart enough to avoid humans, and has the ability to survive in the woods. A creature that could easily be confused as The Big Foot. There is something to multiple sightings of the same creature all over the world in the same type of terrain. Chupacabra? They finally figured out what it was...some strange breed of dog.

Really? lol

[EvonRose]

I'm a believer of source...

Until we are able to explore every inch of the land and sea and universe... I am not going to discredit it...

Look what happened with the Giant squid, Many people were made fun of and humiliated because it's simply not possible for a 60 feet squid to exist right?

WRONG!

So I would not b surprised if the big foot was some hairy caveman.

Or the lochness monster was some left over dinosaur

Or the ufo were life form from another planet

Or the boogey man was your fat mother....

If we do not know 25 percent of the world we live in, how can you say we know everything? Humans have the biggest ego thinking we are so advanced, when we have a systems that put innocent people in jail, or a country who's major source is gas and fossil? Newsflash! thousands years from now, we will be another dumb stupid ancient civilization...

[GrimFusion]

Bwahahahahaha, why in the hell would you say you're 6'4"? The comment about the box was a metaphor, lol. If you actually did realize those other areas existed you would of included the word some, because it changes the entire meaning of the sentence! Yes, I am going to force you to say what you mean, and I am going to challenge you on concepts that I feel you have a narrow view of, and that is exactly why I made my post. So if you're too lazy to include the word 'some' when putting thoughts to words then you will forever be harangued by me.

If you want to waste your time inciting issue with me over word choice or negligible omission, be my guest. I'd suggest that instead of telling me what I should have added or retracted from my posts, you should reply with your own opinions and from your own standpoint so your intentions aren't misconstrued as an attack.

Your fault thus far has been your assumption that I don't understand the full scope of your response. That I'm somehow dullard enough to escape your metaphors and miss the entire point. I just don't think the debate you've approached me with is creditable enough for concern. That's why I'm poking fun at your metaphors and not going into much of any depth in debating this with you.

That doesn't mean I'll never consider the qualms you may have with my posts, but pick your fuckin' battles, man. This is petty.

[MrsKellyPierce]

I heard the loch ness monster is real - he is just good at hiding

[runningdownthatdream]

Josephus Flavius
Pliny the Younger
Tacitus
Suetonius
Talmud
Letters of Pontius Pilate
Cornelius Tacitus
Lucian of Samosata
Thallus and Phlegon
Mara Bar-Serapion
Josephus
The four Gospels

Kids start looking in your public library, or ebay...

Again you miss the point and running off a bunch of names from that book doesn't mean that Jesus was God. Clearly there are historical facts incorporated into the general story. Have you read the hundreds of texts found from that period? Do you know why those relatively few selected from the many hundreds that have been found were chosen to become what is know today as the Christian Bible?

Evon, you are showing a closed mind and worse a closed mind while still young and still without enough time to have read enough. Try reading other religious texts - the Vedas, the Sumerian writings, . Read the Epic of Gilgamesh. Read known writers from that time don't just do a look up on Google and read snippets from the web. I too can point to many writers and writings without the benefit of a Google look up. However, it is incumbent on the individual to read as much as they can and then formulate an opinion. There isn't a recommended bibliography for life or general knowledge.

If you choose to believe in Christianity and choose to believe Jesus was a historical figure with all the attributes accorded by a FEW writers with religious and political axes to grind against Jews then that's your choice. But presuming you're right and others are wrong when it comes to this topic just shows immaturity IMO.

[italianamerican25]

I'm a believer of source...

Until we are able to explore every inch of the land and sea and universe... I am not going to discredit it...

Look what happened with the Giant squid, Many people were made fun of and humiliated because it's simply not possible for a 60 feet squid to exist right?

WRONG!

So I would not b surprised if the big foot was some hairy caveman.

Or the lochness monster was some left over dinosaur

Or the ufo were life form from another planet

Or the boogey man was your fat mother....

If we do not know 25 percent of the world we live in, how can you say we know everything? Humans have the biggest ego thinking we are so advanced, when we have a systems that put innocent people in jail, or a country who's major source is gas and fossil? Newsflash! thousands years from now, we will be another dumb stupid ancient civilization...

Sounds like you are getting annoyed by this. lol

[EvonRose]

Again you miss the point and running off a bunch of names from that book doesn't mean that Jesus was God. Clearly there are historical facts incorporated into the general story. Have you read the hundreds of texts found from that period? Do you know why those relatively few selected from the many hundreds that have been found were chosen to become what is know today as the Christian Bible?

Evon, you are showing a closed mind and worse a closed mind while still young and still without enough time to have read enough. Try reading other religious texts - the Vedas, the Sumerian writings, . Read the Epic of Gilgamesh. Read known writers from that time don't just do a look up on Google and read snippets from the web. I too can point to many writers and writings without the benefit of a Google look up. However, it is incumbent on the individual to read as much as they can and then formulate an opinion. There isn't a recommended bibliography for life or general knowledge.

If you choose to believe in Christianity and choose to believe Jesus was a historical figure with all the attributes accorded by a FEW writers with religious and political axes to grind against Jews then that's your choice. But presuming you're right and others are wrong when it comes to this topic just shows immaturity IMO.

Omg! I can't believe you just said that...

I never stated Jesus was god... but a living human.

If that makes me immature and stupid then so is Einstein... And in my opinion Einstein has the credit of being a genius and you don't....

There you are again pointing out my age as if I have not learned a thing, but whatever when people point out my age and my looks as a sense of stupidity, you already lost by assuming something you have no knowledge of...

Not believing in something without actual proof is just as closed minded as believing in something with proof... Get my drift?

Give me a few names of historical figures that proves Jesus isn't real...

[Dino Velvet]

Not real..... even the boogyman is bottom nowadays.

Maybe the other Michael Myers but not this one.

[KittyPride]

Btw Jesus never said he was God... He said that we are ALL children of God