Racist "pls no black guys" bullshit ho

[The Shika]

Tl;dr

So are black people cool beans again yet?

[robertlouis]

Why is Giovanni a bit retarted to you? You basically said what I talked about was idiotic, yet I was able to provide proof of what I said, and all you said was LOOK IT UP! If you can't show me documentation I don't believe shit, I acknowledge the truth once it's presented, I am not big on believing shit!

Read what loveboof said, FFS. He's calling Arnie retarded, not Giovanni.

*smh*

[jamesedwards]

Read what loveboof said, FFS. He's calling Arnie retarded, not Giovanni.

*smh*

Oh ok, my bad I apologize to Loveboof for that one. Thanks for pointing that out. See if I am wrong I have no problem saying I am wrong.

[giovanni_hotel]

Homo sapiens = human beings.

Homo erectus etc. = NOT human beings.

Human ancestors, but not human beings.

It's ironic as a Black man you're arguing James that ancient sub-humans were indeed 'human'.

Check yourself.

[jamesedwards]

Homo sapiens = human beings.

Homo erectus etc. = NOT human beings.

Human ancestors, but not human beings.

It's ironic as a Black man you're arguing James that ancient sub-humans were indeed 'human'.

Check yourself.

Again I don't use the term BLACKMAN for myself Gio, I am sure you read my post where I told Lovaboof that. If you can show me a pure black man then I will accept that. The complexion of the darkest person is of deep dark brown, and we are not colored or colors, we are not a box of crayons, we are different shades and hues of complexions.

Now let me ask you, since the article said "HUMAN SKULL 7 MILLION YEARS FOUND" ummmmm how in the world do you think that is sub human? You gotta explain that to me. As a matter of fact show me a sub human skull and what in the world is a sub human? Is that an animal? I didn't show you animals bro I showed you proof of Humans existing millions of years as HUMANS! We didn't start off as homo sapiens bro or another dam title that the Europeans have used to define us once again and a lot of you go for that. Our ancestors lived here for millions of years as Humans! The artifacts and fossils speak for themselves! The European slave owners called African HUMANS 3/5 ths of human do you believe that also?



It says the size is chimp like but more human like, and they know dam well that is a human!

As a matter of fact they not to long ago found that Sahara desert there seems to be land scape under it showing at one time it was a tropical area! Just like Egypt was under water at one time it didn't exist, water bought the silt down in the inudation period for thousands of years to make the land there. There's nothing sub about African people.

[giovanni_hotel]

My cutoff is homo sapiens.
Rest of em are proto humans, not 'us'.

[loveboof]

Did you read what you posted James?

It says no signs of iron smelting are present and that in all likelihood they were not after iron because they refilled the excavation sites with the haematite ore so as to not offend the nature spirits.

Firstly you were at least 7000 years early with your claim, and secondly mining is very different to smelting.

Just google iron smelting dude. I'm no expert, and as you said not everything on the Internet is true - it's up to you to cross reference the material and decide for yourself.

I think you are wrong mate, but more than anything I can't believe I'm actually arguing with someone about the iron age online, who fucking cares?! lol.

[0utrageousss]

Again I don't use the term BLACKMAN for myself Gio, I am sure you read my post where I told Lovaboof that. If you can show me a pure black man then I will accept that. The complexion of the darkest person is of deep dark brown, and we are not colored or colors, we are not a box of crayons, we are different shades and hues of complexions.

Now let me ask you, since the article said "HUMAN SKULL 7 MILLION YEARS FOUND" ummmmm how in the world do you think that is sub human? You gotta explain that to me. As a matter of fact show me a sub human skull and what in the world is a sub human? Is that an animal? I didn't show you animals bro I showed you proof of Humans existing millions of years as HUMANS! We didn't start off as homo sapiens bro or another dam title that the Europeans have used to define us once again and a lot of you go for that. Our ancestors lived here for millions of years as Humans! The artifacts and fossils speak for themselves! The European slave owners called African HUMANS 3/5 ths of human do you believe that also?



It says the size is chimp like but more human like, and they know dam well that is a human!

As a matter of fact they not to long ago found that Sahara desert there seems to be land scape under it showing at one time it was a tropical area! Just like Egypt was under water at one time it didn't exist, water bought the silt down in the inudation period for thousands of years to make the land there. There's nothing sub about African people.

You're dead wrong. Human beings as we are (Homo sapiens sapiens) came about in Africa 200,000 years ago according to every encyclopedia/text book I've read. Perhaps you should stick to getting double penetrated by men with breasts, that seems to be all you're good at...

[jamesedwards]

Homo sapiens = human beings.

Homo erectus etc. = NOT human beings.

.

You saying that is totally wrong! Hence the very word Homo Erectus means "set upright" meaning those humans stood up. Don't we stand up? So how do you call them not human beings? What source of info that is credible gives you this to call them not human? Where did you get this from?

Ok lets do this.

wikipedia says this:

Homo erectus (from the Latin ērĭgĕre, "to put up, set upright") is an extinct species of hominid that originated in Africa—and spread as far as India, China and Java—from the end of the Pliocene epoch to the later Pleistocene, about 1.8 to 1.3 million years ago.[1][2] There is still disagreement on the subject of the classification, ancestry, and progeny of H. erectus, with two major alternative hypotheses: erectus may be another name for Homo ergaster, and therefore the direct ancestor of later hominids such as Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis, and Homo sapiens; or it may be an Asian species distinct from African ergaster.

Many paleoanthropologists still debate the definition of H. erectus and H. ergaster as separate species. Some call H. ergaster the direct African ancestor of H. erectus, proposing that it emigrated out of Africa and migrated into Asia, branching into a distinct species.[18] Most dispense with the species-name ergaster, making no distinction between such fossils as the Turkana Boy and Peking Man.[citation needed] Though "Homo ergaster" has gained some acceptance as a valid taxon, these two are still usually defined as distinct African and Asian populations of the larger species H. erectus.

End.

So if paleoanthropolgist still debate this, how can you sit here and give a definite answer as though they are sub human? These are people in the field that study this ish day in and out. Yet if you look at the skull of the Home Erectus it's human, and I have studied this academically!

There's nothing sub human about this skull!



They claim Homo Erectus looked like this:



But who on the planet looks like this today and still here on this earth?
Aborigine people in Austraila!




Ruth Shady even found skulls that match in South America Caral, Peru and they look like those people above! They are the oldest on the planet and they still live today, European CAucasians have wiped them out by the millions they are only in the hundreds and thousands, either mixed or dead!

I ask you how can the CAucasians who came on the scene just about 1,100 BCE come and tell the story of Africans that were here millions of years ago? That's why they are confused! That's like you trying to do an autobiography on me and you know nothing about me, my family, hell you don't even know where I live. That shit would be an oxymoron! I have studied under greats like Dr. Jeffries, Shiek Ante Diop, Ivan Van Sertima etc and those men are African descent and blessed the souls of Diop and Sertima those men were well knowledgeable about their own people. You have people in Africa still living their indigenious ways, I am not ashamed of them I see them and give them a big ass hug those my people too. It's like mofos are so fucking modernized and Americanized they will call their own brothers and sista sub human that live like that. If they survived all this long like they have then I tip my fucking hat to them because they are some strong mofos! A brother once said "IF WANT TO KNOW ABOUT YOURSELF FIND OUT FROM YOUR PEOPLE NOT LET ANOTHER PEOPLE TELL YOU YOUR STORY OF YOURSELF". That's some real talk right there.

[loveboof]

We didn't start off as homo sapiens bro or another dam title that the Europeans have used to define us once again and a lot of you go for that. Our ancestors lived here for millions of years as Humans! The artifacts and fossils speak for themselves!

James, you are a little confused about how evolution works.

Those fossils are from a different species. Every human alive today is of no relation to those other proto humanoid apes.

We evolved down a different line - just as chimpanzees are our cousins and not a prior evolutionary state.

It is complicated, but you are mistaken.