Results 41 to 50 of 158
-
09-14-2011 #41
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
a) I've just counted on SMY's last 100 updated models. Only one MAY be a crossdresser/part-timer, I'm not sure - so I'd say yes, we still are the internet's premiere transssexual site.
b) No, Bella - you drew conclusions. I clearly just put that up to show one of the few differences in people and that not everyone falls into MEN or WOMEN. It had nothing to do with TV vs TS - I even stated below, it was just one "little example".
Your nasty piece of work aren't you? I know you revel in it but it's very disturbing how nasty you really are. I wouldn't put anything past that twisted little mind of yours.
-
09-14-2011 #42
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
sceanchai no need to defend giving your customers what they want to see.
a guy jerking off to a shemaleyum vid could give a fuck if the model is TV, CD, TS, or whatever.
wasn't Jamie Markham hugely popular before she decided to go do gay porn ?
-
09-14-2011 #43
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
I didn't say the TV's were popular, I just that they're there and marketed on a site that you still, even in this sentence, swear is the premier transsexual site. Since it also features TV's, which part of my statement is incorrect? Oh right... none of it.
I understand that, but I'd also argue that it shadows your actions in this matter. They speak louder than your words.
I don't revel in any of this. The nasty piece of work is you, making personal arguments out of the tiniest criticisms, until, lo and behold, the criticisms grow stronger and louder because now you've gone and pissed people off who have business, investigative, and political skills that you can't match who, due to your own ignorant, shortsighted actions, you've radicalized against you.
As I've said on numerous occasions, there are plenty of people who agree with what I've said about you and your company and you're just mad that you can't destroy my integrity as the perceived leader of said people.
Politics 101.
~BB~
-
09-14-2011 #44
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Not trying to speak on behalf of Steven, but Marketing TVs and TSs is a no brainer... Members of TGirl porn sites obviously want to see both because they know Some TV's and some TSs are passable or attractive to them.
I don't think he Markets them together because he actually believes they are the SAME thing.
You're just picking an argument every time the guy posts something..
We get it Bella, you don't like him.
Last edited by Kayden Harley; 09-14-2011 at 11:49 PM.
-
09-14-2011 #45
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
so right about this Flabby lol
the consumer don't differentiate - unless they say oh that one has tits so it must be a tranny
Need I remind you a ts is based on what's going on in the inside not just the outside..how do you know the girl isn't a TS - oh right cause she hasn't been on hormones as long as you or had surgery still working on her shadow
My official Adult Blog
http://www.kellypierceblog.com
My Official Blog for my TS Sisters
http://www.secretkelly.com
My official Cam Site
http://www.kellysdreamhouse.com
-
09-14-2011 #46
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
If I didn't know better I'd say you just proved my point for me.
Even still. That doesn't mean a transitioning girl is ready to model. Jamie was a perfect example. As popular as 'she' was, it was clear that 'she' wasn't a TS, and yet 'she' was getting all this attention because of 'her' proximity to Brittany. Nepotism, much?
That's unfair. I let him do his thing until he starts talking about trans-politics. I don't care how many model yes-girls that just want to stay on the money man's good side defend him, I only attack when I think he's saying or doing something that I find politically unfair or disadvantageous to transwomen, particularly when he stands to benefit. For the most part, I've been leaving his posts alone.
~BB~
Last edited by BellaBellucci; 09-15-2011 at 12:52 AM.
-
09-14-2011 #47
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- NY for now(upstate area) but trying to move to LA!
- Posts
- 1,181
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
I Can Suck You Dry!!!
:jerkoff:
-
09-15-2011 #48
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Who are you to make that decision? Who are you to say she wasn't ready? She was popular, guys enjoyed her, she was one of the best sellers on Shemale Strokers? Unlike you.
Absolutely pathetic. You attack me constantly on a business and a personal level. You've went out of your way with poor attempts to hurt my business and the people working in it. You were a yes-girl ... we were the ones who said, hmm thanks but NO!!!
-
09-15-2011 #49
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
-
09-15-2011 #50
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
That would be their convenient excuse, but actually they invited me to shoot, promised to help me get into the business, dropped the ball on it, played with my shoot release date because I wanted to self-promote, used the WORST photos in the sets (that never should be been released, let alone showcased) to market me (effectively slowing my career), patronized me until they couldn't anymore at which time Steven decided to publicly argue with me about it instead of talking to me one-on-one. This is to say nothing of the Mean Girls' 'Plastics' attitude that is encouraged among their people. They truly think their shit doesn't stink.
From there I decided I would scrutinize Grooby's business plan more closely, and lo and behold, I found everything I needed to establish that it runs like the 'Wal-Mart of Tranny Pr0n,' step on the little guy, promote the undeserving, and blur the lines between TS/TV/CD so that a a 24/7 man in lipstick and a dress is somehow the same as an individual who has taken the time and had the commitment to assert and confirm their identity as female.
I could go on, but it might take all day. I won't lie: things are looking up and I think there have been efforts made lately to level the playing field, and in private conversations on this topic, I've given him credit for that. The question is whether or not he has an ulterior motive and if it will be enough to undo the damage that he's caused to the image of transsexuals over the years.
Mark my words though, if Steven actually puts in more effort to help transwomen become more independent and accepted in society, I will be the first to congratulate him. As far as I'm concerned, the personal stuff has been water under the bridge for quite some time. This is purely business/political now.
~BB~
Last edited by BellaBellucci; 09-15-2011 at 12:53 AM.
Similar Threads
-
Tara Emory as "Ivana Kumalova" in "Diamonds are Hard"
By Tara Emory in forum The HungAngels ForumReplies: 9Last Post: 07-21-2011, 04:54 PM -
Do these "tricks" work with ts's too? Ladies, seriously I want your opinions.
By toopretty in forum The HungAngels ForumReplies: 72Last Post: 10-12-2010, 02:05 AM -
Can we please combine the "Club Kids" and "Pretty Boy" thread's.
By Silcc69 in forum The HungAngels ForumReplies: 19Last Post: 06-03-2010, 10:52 AM -
If you wonder why TS's have an "attitude..."
By justatransgirl in forum The HungAngels ForumReplies: 6Last Post: 11-08-2007, 02:23 AM -
"ADMIRERS" pay attention watching Tgirl magazines
By romeo in forum The HungAngels ForumReplies: 0Last Post: 05-07-2005, 02:53 PM