Quoting site stats has got to go...

(everything in red is quoted from KIM)
"36 million hits on my website in the last 6 months!

Check the stats for yourself here:

http://kimsanalheaven.com/stats/awstats.html

Not bad for a man in a wig, with NO implants and not on hormones!"

OK THESE SITE STATS ARE GETTING RETARDED. You do know that there is a difference between a HIT and a VISIT? Right?!! A hit is everytime a unique piece of information is grabbed from your website... a jpg, a stretch of text, basic html code, table, etc.

I read your stats... here's the actual break down:

In 6 months you have had: 72,553 visits at an average of 192 seconds per visit. Your most visited page is your tour page and the greatest use of your bandwidth comes from your tour video.

You derive most of your traffic from these three high traffic sites:

http://www.trannymix.com/pics/crossdresser
http://www.crossdressingsissies.com
http://www.shegods.com

What this tells me is that you are getting a relatively normal to low flow of traffic from high traffic sites, people are stopping by for a minute and going, "meh". and taking off to watch something else. the rest of the mainstay visitors are repeat visitors and not unique in anyway shape or form.

The majority of your bandwidth you use rest almost solely on your one tour video.

Dude you're a joke. Quit it with the tech talk... it's a language you clearly don't understand.

Incoming alexa.com :wiggle:

Nah, the retard has been caught.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jamie French

Originally Posted by tvkim View Post
36 million hits on my website in the last 6 months!

Check the stats for yourself here:

http://kimsanalheaven.com/stats/awstats.html


Not bad for a man in a wig, with NO implants and not on hormones!

OK THESE SITE STATS ARE GETTING RETARDED. You do know that there is a difference between a HIT and a VISIT? Right?!! A hit is everytime a unique piece of information is grabbed from your website... a jpg, a stretch of text, basic html code, table, etc.

I read your stats... here's the actual break down:

In 6 months you have had: 72,553 visits at an average of 192 seconds per visit. Your most visited page is your tour page and the greatest use of your bandwidth comes from your tour video.

You derive most of your traffic from these three high traffic sites:

http://www.trannymix.com/pics/crossdresser
http://www.crossdressingsissies.com
http://www.shegods.com

What this tells me is that you are getting a relatively normal to low flow of traffic from high traffic sites, people are stopping by for a minute and going, "meh". and taking off to watch something else. the rest of the mainstay visitors are repeat visitors and not unique in anyway shape or form.

The majority of your bandwidth you use rest almost solely on your one tour video.

Dude you're a joke. Quit it with the tech talk... it's a language you clearly don't understand.

---

What's the point of this? Was Kim bothering you that much? I don't much care for looking at her prolapse, but other than that her bragging had no effect on me. Am I missing something?

@dgs925: I wasn't speaking on your behalf so I never bothered to get your permission. funny how that works.

Anywho - it bothers ME to see cartoon characters like this make a lot of noise... it casts a bad vibe over the rest of us who have a sense of proportion and a little humility about what it is that we do.

The unwarranted ego trips are a pain to read - in and of itself, no big deal - until facts start being thrown around rather than opinions. I always make time to call someone out on false claims.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dgs925

What's the point of this? Was Kim bothering you that much? I don't much care for looking at her prolapse, but other than that her bragging had no effect on me. Am I missing something?

---

Its not hard to figure out DGS.

I set em up and they all fall down! Like taking candy from a baby.

Woops nearly forgot.... http://kimsanalheaven.com/stats/main5.cgi

Challenge accepted. You said the cutesy drag queen thing - now answer for the facts.
Let's see that brain of yours in action.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tvkim

Its not hard to figure out DGS.

I set em up and they all fall down! Like taking candy from a baby.

Woops nearly forgot.... http://kimsanalheaven.com/stats/main5.cgi

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jamie French

@dgs925: I wasn't speaking on your behalf so I never bothered to get your permission. funny how that works.

Anywho - it bothers ME to see cartoon characters like this make a lot of noise... it casts a bad vibe over the rest of us who have a sense of proportion and a little humility about what it is that we do.

The unwarranted ego trips are a pain to read - in and of itself, no big deal - until facts start being thrown around rather than opinions. I always make time to call someone out on false claims.

---

I get it, you like to make yourself feel better by putting others down. You are just another bully. Apparently nothing has changed since the last time you were here.

What is a good # for visits per month? I clicked her link and see that she does indeed not get the really high number of new visitors that she claims, but the number of visitors still seems pretty high, no?

I see her link says she had 29,288 vistors for march. I see for my site on google analytics that in the last 30 days, I have had a much higher amount of visitors to my site than 29K. I am assuming that my "hits" would look ridiculously high as well if I looked at that. Just trying to get an idea of what is actually a good number?

A bully in what way? I'm just a nobody but when someone makes my brain hurt I'm going to say something about it.

As Carl Sagan said, "Extraordinary claims must be backed by extraordinary evidence". The sad thing is that a link to the numbers were given and they only served to counter the audacious claim. This tells me the Kim thinks you are an idiot. If anything, I'm pointing out where the poison is... You're welcome.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dgs925

I get it, you like to make yourself feel better by putting others down. You are just another bully. Apparently nothing has changed since the last time you were here.

---

A good number is the one on your CCbill paycheck.
Conversions - conversions - conversions.... the only numbers that count. You're truly popular when people are willing to pay to hang out around your website, not just show up, take a quick look and move on down the road.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AmyDaly

What is a good # for visits per month? I clicked her link and see that she does indeed not get the really high number of new visitors that she claims, but the number of visitors still seems pretty high, no?

I see her link says she had 29,288 vistors for march. I see for my site on google analytics that in the last 30 days, I have had a much higher amount of visitors to my site than 29K. I am assuming that my "hits" would look ridiculously high as well if I looked at that. Just trying to get an idea of what is actually a good number?

---

Well yea, but new visitors does matter to some extent, right? You guys know more than I do about this stuff. I am not my own web master lol

Jamie, no problems with you or Kim, but in all honesty, your comments are a bit misleading... you say " In 6 months you have had: 72,553 visits at an average of 192 seconds per visit.".... looking at awstats I can see that is not quite true.

72553, represents her number of visits for August alone.
Total number of visits is 1,123,460 in 6 months, a vastly different number to the one you claim... yet you somehow come here to talk about "facts".

Yes is true that a lot of that traffic is just people that look, and go away, total number or unique visitors (non subscribers) is 877,240, meaning that 78% of the traffic was people that looked once and did never came back.

Its also true that more than 80% of the traffic stayed less than 2 minutes.

Conversely its also true that roughly 6% of the traffic stayed 15 minutes or more on the site, thats a good 4300 visits coming from subscribers in 11 days of the month.... if the number is consistent with the visits over 6 months (which I can't tell for sure), that would imply a good 66+ thousand visits from subscribers in 6 months, which is not a bad number either. (Of course that means visits... and not number of subscribers... or income per subscriber).

In all honesty, AWStats is not the best gauge to measure a website, and should not be used as the ONLY tool to measure traffic, but it does have a function.

Still, going back to the "facts", not to defend anyone, but your so called facts are a little (in fact very) skewed.

Oops, you are correct. I typed one number while looking at another. Everything else you said was true too which still = pretty weak sauce, and nowhere near the 36 million he's claiming.

Jamie i tho u were a crossdresser to no?

I aint saying anything.

I think Google Analytics is more accurate than Alexa

I call myself no specific thing... I leave it up to the customer to come up with whatever title fit's their fantasy best.

As soon as I label myself then I'm stuck in a corner and I'm the type of person who likes to wear many hats.

Also, what does that have to do with inflated web stats?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SunshyneMonroe

Jamie i tho u were a crossdresser to no?

---

Keep it positive guys

I'd very much like to see the Google Analytics stats as well... Awstats looks like it's counting bot, spiders and web crawlers as unique visits as well while discounting hits, (other wise resulting in an astronomical hit count)

Google Analytics is much more concise and upfront with the numbers that matter most.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jamie French

I call myself no specific thing... I leave it up to the customer to come up with whatever title fit's their fantasy best.

As soon as I label myself then I'm stuck in a corner and I'm the type of person who likes to wear many hats.

Also, what does that have to do with inflated web stats?

---

if it doesnt have ne thing to do with ne thing why put it in the post in the first place....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SunshyneMonroe

if it doesnt have ne thing to do with ne thing why put it in the post in the first place....

---

Are you referring to me saying, "He"? That's what he wants to be called. It would be disrespectful not to call someone what they call themselves.

ANYWAY: Check this out... http://developmentseed.org/blog/anal...gle_serverlogs

To sum up if you don't want to click:

"Bottom Line: Server logs will always give you a higher number of page views, visits, and unique visitors when compared to a web-based, javascript solution like Google Analytics, and in most cases the high numbers are too high."

Come on jaime dont hurt people feelings

No im talkin about when u said......................Not bad for a man in a wig, with NO implants and not on hormones!


I just think that was rude to say.....

If this hurts peoples feelings then a little research should clear it right up.

http://developmentseed.org/blog/anal...gle_serverlogs

To sum up if you don't want to click:

"Bottom Line: Server logs will always give you a higher number of page views, visits, and unique visitors when compared to a web-based, javascript solution like Google Analytics, and in most cases the high numbers are too high."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BigBlackMan

Come on jaime dont hurt people feelings

---

I don't think she is trying to hurt feelings. Kim has made a few posts about her millions of hits to her website or something like that and posts her stats, so she made it public discussion herself.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AmyDaly

I don't think she is trying to hurt feelings. Kim has made a few posts about her millions of hits to her website or something like that and posts her stats, so she made it public discussion herself.

---

But she didnt have to say the man in a wig ect that was just rude amy...

THAT WASN'T MY QUOTE! KIM WROTE THAT... everything in red is Kim... if I forgot to highlight something in red then it was a mistake.... I wrote everything that's in black.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SunshyneMonroe

But she didnt have to say the man in a wig ect that was just rude amy...

---

Well yea, but I wasn't talking about that part, just the web stats part. The thread comes off as hostile, but I think the comments about the web stats are valid.

edit: Jamie says that she was just quoting Kim.

THAT WASN'T MY QUOTE! KIM WROTE THAT... everything in red is Kim... if I forgot to highlight something in red then it was a mistake.... I wrote everything that's in black.

I fixed the OP so it's easier to follow)

Kim I think they jealous of you. She gets more views than HA.

Kim I told u nicely the other day to not put your stats , anyways ..

OMFG!!

Which should tell you that the numbers are false... here, read this:
http://developmentseed.org/blog/anal...gle_serverlogs

To sum up if you don't want to click:

"Bottom Line: Server logs will always give you a higher number of page views, visits, and unique visitors when compared to a web-based, javascript solution like Google Analytics, and in most cases the high numbers are too high."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BigBlackMan

Kim I think they jealous of you. She gets more views than HA.

---

Kim is the finest ts on HA. Nobody can compare to her.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jamie French

(everything in red is quoted from KIM)
36 million hits on my website in the last 6 months!

Check the stats for yourself here:

http://kimsanalheaven.com/stats/awstats.html


Not bad for a man in a wig, with NO implants and not on hormones!

OK THESE SITE STATS ARE GETTING RETARDED. You do know that there is a difference between a HIT and a VISIT? Right?!! A hit is everytime a unique piece of information is grabbed from your website... a jpg, a stretch of text, basic html code, table, etc.

I read your stats... here's the actual break down:

In 6 months you have had: 72,553 visits at an average of 192 seconds per visit. Your most visited page is your tour page and the greatest use of your bandwidth comes from your tour video.

You derive most of your traffic from these three high traffic sites:

http://www.trannymix.com/pics/crossdresser
http://www.crossdressingsissies.com
http://www.shegods.com

What this tells me is that you are getting a relatively normal to low flow of traffic from high traffic sites, people are stopping by for a minute and going, "meh". and taking off to watch something else. the rest of the mainstay visitors are repeat visitors and not unique in anyway shape or form.

The majority of your bandwidth you use rest almost solely on your one tour video.

Dude you're a joke. Quit it with the tech talk... it's a language you clearly don't understand.

---

I swear to christ the longer I'm on here, the less I understand what it is you all call a "community" WTF?
I'm the last one to put people in a category, but you calling Kim a man in a wig is kinda like a fart telling a pile of shit it stinks. I mean what the fuck is it with some of you that you can't challenge each others assertions or opinions without denigrating each other ? You want understanding and respect from everybody outside the community, and you have none for each other. I like what it is you do Jamie, and I dig some of Kim's stuff as well....what's that bumper sticker say on all those old VW buses...."Coexist" lol
And you winder where dudes like Little Guy get his ideas from !

omg nikki

AGAIN. KIM WROTE WHAT YOU SEE IN RED. I called no one a man in a wig. READ PEOPLE!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jamie French

AGAIN. KIM WROTE WHAT YOU SEE IN RED. I called no one a man in a wig. READ PEOPLE!

---

Jamie I like u, u r a singer and composer like me, why do u care about kim´s server stats anyways, they r just numbers :iagree:

Onmyknees that was rude.