Printable View
This clown has zero knowledge of politics yet he stays planted in this section as if he owns a piece of property. When you challenge his primative prehostoric views he gets buttsore and upset in a very femanine manner. he uses the same reference over and over about this tinfoil that he wears. Mike I just dont get it and you make no sense. Why dont you get the fuck off this board and stop spreading your lies and backwards ass mentality.
fuck you
Did I hurt your feelings, shit stain?
:sadcry :sadcry :sadcry :sadcry :sadcry
Maybe you should think about finishing high school instead if chasing trannies, cretin.Quote:
Originally Posted by addicted
Wow, somebody actually can "see" here... Nice work!Quote:
Originally Posted by addicted
BWAAAHAAAHAAHAHAHA!!!!
worthy2 aka addicted aka adipshit is having another moron meltdown!!! Check it out!!
http://www.hungangels.com/board/view...42040&start=40
Look! It's dumb and dumber! HA's nutty buddies!! :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by El Nino
Quote:
Originally Posted by addicted
Chefmike has no knowledge of politics yet you get all your information from sites like infowars.com. And stop bashing women, faggot.
I feel I must comment here as I hate to see people wasting their energies on 'immovable minds'. It's just a thought, but I think you should stop letting this chefmike guy bother you so much and put your energies into waking up people who are receptive to the truth. The fact is that some people cannot handle the truth and so they will derail any kind of attempt to debate the subject and force it to degenerate into a simple bout of name-calling, backed up with zero facts, in order to feel 'safe'. This is what is called 'dumbing down the debate' and it is the simplest of all defences.
People like this will always scream 'tinfoil hat wearer' at you because it is far easier than them examining the evidence for themselves and drawing a reasoned and informed conclusion. Even if that conclusion turns out to be at odd's with your own, it could still be respected as it would be, at least, an informed opinion. This guy's mind is made up and 'immovable' and trying to convince him that what you are saying is true serves no purpose. He, and you and I for that matter, will find out who speaks the truth soon enough. Meanwhile move on, start a website, start a local We Are Change chapter, do anything to direct your energies toward a more positive objective, ie informing people with open minds. People who, like most rational people, DO have questions about 9/11, DO have questions about the War on Terror and DO have questions about the Banker Bailout and who their Governments work for and how they conduct themselves. Just my two cents!
PS Flame away chefmike, I couldn't give a shit!
PPS Kittykaiti I don't know where the women bashing comment comes from, I presume that is something from another thread? However, for the record, I do not condone the bashing of ANYONE, period. I am pro-human race and pro-humanity, no matter what package it comes in! Hence why I am so passionate about holding my Govt accountable for acts of treason and torture, especially when the weight of evidence against them is so great.
On the other hand, the source of the evidence can be an indicator that the “evidence” is just not worth wading through. Sometimes, the claim being made is an indicator that the argument is not worth reading. Patent officials are instructed, with good reason, to ignore claims of perpetual motion, mathematicians ignore letters that purport to square the circle and historians aren’t clamoring to chronicle the adventures of the lost tribe of Israel in North America as described in the writings of the prophet Joseph Smith. There’s so little time, and so many sources to pursue of more promising integrity.
This diatribe from the man who said this!!Quote:
Originally Posted by daveskarety
Talk about an 'immovable' mind. Trish is right...schlock science isn't worth the time or energy and the crap your peddling is based solely on schlock science and hearsay.Quote:
9/11? Total Inside Job! I am still amazed when I meet anyone who thinks otherwise
For what it's worth, maybe this might shed some light on the situation. It's a term I've used here before: "Cognitive Dissonance"Quote:
Originally Posted by daveskarety
http://www.ashburnelementary.blogspot.com/
The irony in that statement is rich. :shock: :shock:Quote:
Originally Posted by El Nino
Is it Oli?
Isn't it? :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Oli
while myself and chef mike are poles apart in politics and I will piss myself laughing when Sarah Palin becomes presidente of the United States, bringing with her sexyness hellfire and brimstone on the abortionists and faggots , I find him a rather intelligent person and I would far rather share a pint of guiness with an ex serviceman than some of the muppets on here.
He at least knows a cunt when he can smell it and I rather like the cut of his jib when dealing with some of the mouthbreathers on here. Legend and the trannys in de hood (mimi vannesa et al) are the ones who grip my shit.
Why are so obsessed with me? Why are you on this crusade to prove your prehostoric thinking is law? I think you are upset because everything you stand politicaly is bullshit and has failed. Now you are standing there like a deer in headlights, Confused and ashamed.Quote:
Originally Posted by chefmike
I dont who the fuck you are writing this gay ass faggotry post but fuck you faggot.Quote:
Originally Posted by kittyKaiti
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by addicted
Thanks Arnie, I'd gladly hoist a couple of pints with you, but I don't plan on crossing the pond any time soon. I used to drink on occasion with some Brits who were serving in the merchant marine in my swabbie days, and they were good people and even better drinking buddies.Quote:
Originally Posted by arnie666
As for Palin the caribou queen, she could very well end up with the GOP nomination, but she ain't about to win the election! Of course stranger things have happened. Bush Jr. managed to get himself re-elected when he never won the office to begin with!!
Well chefmike me old china, I am amazed when I meet anyone who believes that the official story of 911 is the truth, truly I am. Even people who know that the US Govt constantly lie still believe that, just this once, they have told us the truth, I find that baffling! However, unlike yourself, I don't instantly leap to verbal abuse as my first and, it seems, only line of rebuttal. I was stating my opinion mate, I'll say it again - MY OPINION. An opinion which, personally, I regard as informed and considered. You obviously disgree, which is cool. As for my mind being immovable you would, if you knew me, be very aware that I regard my opinions as fluid and not immovable. I believed the official account of 911 for years, until I saw evidence I was not aware of before which changed my opinion. As John Maynard Keynes said 'When the facts change, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?' and that's very much my outlook. So come on chefmike, do some research of your own, instead of just hurling insults, and try to change my mind. If you are right, and you can back up your opinions with facts, then maybe you'll succeed!Quote:
Originally Posted by chefmike
I would just like to point out, again, that I couldn't give a shit what you think mate, live in your bubble and dish out your abuse. No fuck given from this direction! The point of my original post was to say to others on here that they shouldn't waste their time on immovable minds like yours. Not unless the mind in question belongs to someone who is capable of engaging them in reasoned and informed debate. I'm afraid that people who merely post 'funny' pictures and say 'where's your tinfoil hat?' don't fall into that category and, therefore, are simply not worth the effort. Sorry to break that to you mate!
They, like I, should think more positively, and direct their energies towards people with a more open mind. That way we can, hopefully, hold some of these crooks to account. As for science maybe you should take the time to look at http://www.ae911truth.org/ and read through some of their research and peer-reviewed papers before your next bout of name-calling - 'schlock science' indeed :)
Actually I responded to Oli's quote, pilgrim. Perhaps you should take a break from immersing yourself in idiotic conspiracy theories(not to mention the hucksters who profit from dupes like yourself) and do a little research on the quote function, Einstein.
Not to worry though...as far as you, Nino and the rest of the tinfoil militia go....what can I say?
Birds of a feather.... :roll:
Typical response. Chef loves his bubble...
That link didn't work btw
Actually your wrong. Although i disagree with him on loads and loads and loads and loads of things pertaining to politics and the like . He does know politics and keeps fairly well imformed. It's his opinion or interpretation of politics and events that pertain to government and social shit that you don't like.....god i can't believe i just defended that bitchy ass .Quote:
Originally Posted by addicted
Quote:
Originally Posted by chefmike
Tinfoil Mentioned check
'Funny' picture posted check
Insults and abuse check
Ability to backup opinion zero
Yup a typical chefmike post! Bubble intact! BTW if it's quotes you want;
'All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.'
Arthur Schopenhauer
German philosopher (1788 - 1860)
So do you think Einstein would agree with me on that one chef? Or is irony lost on you chef? How's the research progressing chef? If I am a pilgrim chef, then I at least am one that tries to progress chef (see what I did there?) Are you ready to properly debate chef? Or will you merely refer to tinfoil chef? Mind you, being a chef, chef. I guess it must play a large part in your life chef. But there is a world beyond cookery chef.........
Debate?
LMFAO...you are a truther.
Hence you are a cyberspace laughingstock at best.
For the most part you and your ilk are just annoying trolls and a waste of bandwidth.
Yet you still get your tinfoil panties in a twist when people are so immediately and justifiably dismissive of you.
I'd tell you to get a clue, but why bother?
You wouldn't know what to do with it, pilgrim.
Later, clown.
You really don't do yourself any favours do you mate? I am a 'truther'?? I never said that! That's you attempting to define me by ONE opinion mate! Try to remember that, I have not imposed any labels upon you aside from the ones that you so effortlessly exhibit each and every time you type your latest, repetitive post on here. I'm still yet to hear of your research too mate. All we get is your, seemingly reactionary, opinions.
After reading your last post I am left to ask why are you so quick to write off any powers you may posess to persuade me of your opinions, if you even have them, without even trying? And why do you presume I lack the ability to comprehend any pearls of wisdom which you may dane to cast my pilgrimous, unworthy way? Could it be that, when confronted, you simply realise that your 'opinions' are simple regurgitations of Mainline Editorial and that you have absolutely nothing concrete to back up the 'truth' which you profess to be so closely acquainted with? By your definition, maybe that qualifies you as a 'truther' of sorts?
It's astonishing that you bang on and on about me being a 'truther' and a 'cyberspace laughingstock' when you, it would appear are the epitome of both! Whilst, in the real world, I practise what I preach. I am, what you may call, an ethical Lawyer, you know the poor kind with principals and an inquiring mind. Not someone, like yourself, who pops on here to crack one off in between being insulted about the quality of my souffle and then, in a fit of post-onanistic pique, engages themself in political arguments without even having the first clue or desire to articulate their 'opinion' - save for the rabid cry of 'T I N F O I L - I T ' S - E V E R Y W H E R E !'. BTW what the fuck is it with you and tinfoil? Where you molested by a Turkey one thanksgiving or something?
Anyway, as I said earlier, why bother with 'immovable minds' 3 pages in and zero progress from you. I did think you would prove my initial impression of you correct and you have. TTFN chef, your souffle, like your bridges, are burning!
Best response ever! Set his ass straight for a lifetime...
Dave, great articulation and a big cheers to setting the record straight, on so many levels.
I am still here chefmike, Keep whining the admin's you rat snitch. nobody likes a rat.
What's this business about "ratting" people out here? Ratting for what? Speaking opinins? Seriously...
Mike has yet to refute anything coming from a reputable source posted here. The reason is he can't. He's the same guy that said 2 years ago the economy was in great shape. He hangs out here because he's paid to. Site management feels a need a to have a clown to shake things up from time to time. Mike fits the bill perfectly. He's a good name caller but has the intellectual capacity of a flea.
Reliable source? LMAO. This from the buffoon who said Ted Turner was a paid disinformationalist for the NWO. You mean to say that you and your handful of fellow laughingstocks have ever posted anything but absurd BS from the likes of Alex Jones et al? I wonder if anyone ever noticed it. Not bloody likely, simpleton.Quote:
Mike has yet to refute anything coming from a reputable source posted here.
Note the date thx registered on this site. More fantasy from the acorn academy alumnus. Produce a quote and URL, slick.Quote:
He's the same guy that said 2 years ago the economy was in great shape.
That's what I thought.
You clowns are pathetic.
Something to leave El Ninny, thx and their tinfoil circle jerk with:
“Listening to alex jones on the radio (is) kind of like being mentally gang raped by retards who keep putting their dicks in the wrong holes and then claim that the government hid the normal ones.”
Once again, thanks for the laughs.
However unintentional they were... :lol:
http://www.hungangels.com/board/view...=611706#611706Quote:
Originally Posted by chefmike
Hey mate, these are some of what you consider 'reputable sources'. Most intelligent people consider these sites on par with http://weeklyworldnews.com/Quote:
Originally Posted by thx1138
Quote:
Originally Posted by thx1138
Quote:
Originally Posted by thx1138
Quote:
Originally Posted by thx1138
So, by all means continue to believe your not the Luddite in this conversation...and that applies to El Nino also.Quote:
Originally Posted by thx1138
Oli... get a clue and do the research yourself... documents man, documents
That you believe those sites carry the same intellectual weight as Bloomberg, BBC or the Economist shows that you can not discern the truth.Quote:
Originally Posted by El Nino
You're the one who needs to get a clue.
Some blogs and alternative news sites just post articles that are sourced from those aforementioned sites. Anyway, its not so much the actual "site" that matters, as it is the content and its sourced derivatives.