I was really curious as to which would be more appealing to the guys here.
There's no right or wrong answer btw, because this could very much be considered a "gray area".........so don't be scared. lol
Thanks.
Printable View
I was really curious as to which would be more appealing to the guys here.
There's no right or wrong answer btw, because this could very much be considered a "gray area".........so don't be scared. lol
Thanks.
:popcorn
Your dick gets hard at what your dick gets hard at.
Most men learn this when they turn 13.
Some people should not be passing around any spectator snacks in a thread like this.
I didn't say anything. I'm just having some popcorn is all. This is interesting. Looking at the girls that most men consider pretty here I don't see how they could ever be part time... unless they take their tits, hips and ass off at nite. (I have done part time, after a certain tipping point you can go out looking tore up and you just look like a tore up woman not a man. Understand?)
Ts duh..CD is a man in a wig no matter how hard you get just picture them with their clothes off and it'll die down. lol
[quote="BrendaQG"(I have done part time, after a certain tipping point you can go out looking tore up and you just look like a tore up woman not a man. Understand?)[/quote]
Emphasis on 'certain tipping point'.
And I'm just commenting 'is all'.
interesting
This is a tough choice. Because an unattractive or average looking TS looks kind of like a man.
And a sexy CD looks like a woman. That is, until she takes off her clothes. And even then a pretty, skinny, young CD may look more femme unclothed than a TS thats built like a linebacker.
Quote:
Originally Posted by stro767
That isn't necessarily true.
Just like there are regular, average looking Genetic women in the world, soccer moms, secretaries, Safeway checkout clerks, gas station attendants, etc,
There are plenty of FULL TIME TS women that pass as one of those..........Fully passing.
Hard for you to believe, I guess, considering this is a 24/7 TS porn site full of hawt chicks, but trust me, they do exist, more common than you might think.
It has been discussed often on here Passing=/=Pretty.
At times the difference between a TS and TG (CD/DQ/etc) can be self identification. One stays in drag all the time the other does not.
more of a gay area than a grey
if you only have the option of seeing a busted girl or pretty fag then that tells us 2 things about you...
1. save your money up and buy quality vs. being over eager for that cock
2. your probably shooting close to your league, and the pretty ts's wont touch you and nobody wants to touch the pretty fags so its more a meeting of the minds for both of you
:D
Quote:
Originally Posted by tsntx
Cut it out..........
You're scaring away my pollsters.
:wink:
just pointing out the simple facts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tsntx
:wink:
or dealer ;)
I suppose if you voted for the second one then Shawn and Marlon Wayans from "White Chicks" would do?
http://www.webwombat.com.au/entertai...te-chicks2.JPG
Their fully functional guys!
Don't be jealousQuote:
Originally Posted by BrendaQG
Yeah I wish I had a big of a cock as either of them likely have.
No question for me - although I see I'm in the minority.
It's all about attitude. Femininity starts on the inside and works out, it's not just looks.
I find full-time girls attract me more. Not into cross-dressers or part-time TVs, although I understand others are.
TASTER'S CHOICE !
I voted "YES".
Oh, on the popcorn, I highly recommend some Hickory Bacon Salt mixed in with the butter.
^
What does "yes" mean?
Hicory bacon salt. Hmm.
You know what's good on popcorn.... Pepper. Seriously pepper is really good on popcorn.
I have to vote for attractive CD. It's the feminine qualities that attract me and for some who are part-time, they are still feminine (and cute) when dressed as men.
Quote:
Originally Posted by David J.
Ok.
No problem,
and I appreciate your response.
I don't want no dressed up guy!
damn thats one hell of question, rough one at that
^^^^^^ niceQuote:
Originally Posted by celticgrafix
if anyone if saying nice, its me to youQuote:
Originally Posted by KellyShore
awe thanks hottie.Quote:
Originally Posted by celticgrafix
looks like im going to club diesel now
Quote:
Originally Posted by celticgrafix
I don't think it's that rough.
I think its all relative to the situation, how serious we are dating, and most importantly the girl.
I have some friends that do drag that are part-time who if you saw them in a club you would never know they were part time. In fact many have had work done but still live as males, androgynous but still male. I've known quite a few very attractive girls who lived in the real world as androgynous males. I'm talking girls with sizable breast and/or hips and ass that halfway hide them and present as males. They often have relationships (not serious ones) with men who never see them dressed as males. I would not out them in the CD category though. I don't find 99.999% of CDs attractive enough to even think about dating.
When I see girls like Asia Vitale, Angelique Ali, Maya Montana who are not full-time and who have not had work done, I can't say that I would prefer an average looking TS over someone like them. Asia, would seem to me to appear female even if she had on a 3 piece suit, same for Angelique. In fact I have seen her without a stich of makeup, in jeans and a T-shirt and she looked as femme as any other T in the room.
Well, I did once see Maya out of drag and my heart sank, she's all boy.
In most cases, i'd say never when it comes to part time girls. Definatley not any who clasify as crossdressers. I think a girl can be TS despite not living full-time. Part-time girls that look good enough to date are rare but there are some out there. I just could never see myself actually seeing her in male mode.
Asia Vitale:
Angelique Ali
I could take her part-time self home to the family without so much of a dust of make-up and no one would be the wiser.
I don't know why I read this thread,but me,being the shallow bastard that I know that I am(thank you),I would say neither.Life's short,why settle.
If they are feminine in personality then I can put up with either but if they are masculine in behavior, ala change of voice, muscular, scratch their balls then no thanks.
Might I add, many tgirls exist on some kind of scale of attraction in relationships, some are attracted to other women, tgirls and men and others to men exclusively. I'm only interested in those attracted to men primarily, much easier to work from that position of interaction.
In the end though the more feminine they are the more attracted I am to them whether they are average fulltime or hot part time. Its fairly significantly based on the feminine vibes given off for me to like them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by idiot savant
So,
Just out of curiosity,
Where do you live?
neither.
I have my standards.
And don't forget...Quote:
Originally Posted by tsntx
3.That some posters can just be bitter ass haters, who although may have made some progress in becoming the woman they are, still had to start somewhere and it wasn't the top! So basically this particular poster is dissing anyone who possible may have liked her back durring a time when she didn't even like herself. Thus highlighting the arrogance of allot of shallow tgirls who have easily forgotten were they came from.... that and she's bored at home so she wants to pick an internet fight.
Just stating the obvious.....
If these ladies are CDs, sign me up.