Still more religion out of you guys.
You have yet to PROVE anything. Consensus on theory is garbage science.
Go pray to your god somewhere else.
Printable View
Still more religion out of you guys.
You have yet to PROVE anything. Consensus on theory is garbage science.
Go pray to your god somewhere else.
RULE: Religious nuts can't denigrate anything on the grounds that it religious. by doing so their twisted logic endangers the entire fabric of the universe.
Pure junk.Quote:
Originally Posted by TFan
They cannot prove exponential CO2 because it`s eaily debunked.
There is no obvious correlation between atmospheric CO2 and planetary temperature over the last 600 million years so why would a relatively tiny increase in CO2 mean so much now as the fear mongers at the UN government say ?
since you posted this chart on two different threads i'll respond in both places.
WMC's chart is interesting in that it shows the extraordinary amount of carbon in the atmosphere before the development of photosynthesis. the flowering plants captured that carbon and took it with them to their "graves" where it metamorphized into fossil fuels. Consider the eons it took to sequester all that carbon. Consider that how much of that store as been released in a two hundred year period.
you posted an interesting chart WMC...one that shows how living things have change the atmospheric composition in the past and how that very change can be reversed. thankyou for making the case for life induced global climate change.
WMC claims:
Quote:
That chart is in no way defines exponential CO2.
of course "a quantity is DEFINED to have exponential growth if it's instantaneous rate of growth is proportional to the current value of the quantity. of course no chart can define exponential growth. however, can EXHIBIT exponential growth over a subinterval of its domain. the chart to which professor WMC refers does exhibit such growth. perhaps it can be better seen by reversing the picture so that time increases from left to right on the horizontal axis.
Quote:
Originally Posted by I_love_Cristina_Bianchini
algore stated about 5 years ago the end of the world would begin in 10 years. See you all in 5 years to laugh very very hard in your faces
The leftwing playbook- CO2 is 0.034% of the atmosphere. 3.4 to 5% of all CO2 is man-made. THEREFORE, man is responsible for the majority of climate change ! :screwy Every scientist will tell you that temps increase FIRST, then CO2 follows behind in increasing.
Why read the UN government report, allow me to summarize: The world is going to end, your skin will bubble, drought, storms, pestilence, animals die, women and children suffer most,etc,etc. :lol:
Can you say :
I think by then Al Gore will be back to hunting the nefarious 'ManBearPig'.
WE`RE ALL GONNA DIE !!!Quote:
Originally Posted by guyone
Hahaahaaa!!
National security...
Now, the right wingers here will definitely love this rhetoric.
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/wa...onal_security/
The measure also would order the Pentagon to undertake a series of war games to determine how global climate change could affect US security, including "direct physical threats to the United States posed by extreme weather events such as hurricanes."
It isn't over for Ron DeSantis.
He should know better. He's a graduate of both Yale and Harvard:
Ron DeSantis Signs Bill Weakening Climate Regulations, Expanding Fossil Fuel Use | Truthout
When the Covid pandemic first affected the US he was truly keen on masks and mandates, before realizing a certain segment of Florida's population might not like it -so he ditched the science for politics -same old Ron! Anyway, you might agree that for most deniers the science has always played a secondary role to the politics.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben
When are some of the coastal areas of Florida scheduled to sink under the Atlantic?