X-critic also against Transsexuals

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

You're not open to criticism. I said your site Shemale Yum has very bad quality models. You lied and said that I slandered them. You also stated that you do not want your company to be criticized.

---

Very bad models? Alyssa Adams, Hazel Tucker, Jenna Rachels, Sofia Ferreira, Sofia Sanders, Acadia Veneer, Angela Skye, Natalie Foxx, Brielle Bop, Cristen Cristensen, Alina Apple, Eva Cassini, Megan, Scarlett, Gianna Riviera, Valerie Daniels, Karissima, Yazlene Reyes, Annalise Rose, Kimora Jade, Danika Dreamz, Venus Lux, Texi Trap, Khloe Reyes, Valerie Alamond ...
Just a handful of models shown in THE LAST 10 WEEKS. Sure not every model is to everyone's taste - but that's the point, it's a site that appeals to many which is why it numbers members in the 1000's.

I don't want my company to be criticized, I strife to be the best and I think we attain it. As stated, I'm the only company to offer this sort of discourse and allow feedback but if you start getting too obnoxious (and you're almost there) then you can fuck off and find a property we don't own to bitch on. I answer feedback all the time and often make changes on it - I'm not going to change our model line-up - based on what "Franklin" thinks is right, you're one mouth and you don't represent more than one mouth.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

You say solo scenes are more popular and are downloaded much more. Well duh! There is so much solo content that its going to be downloaded much more. You thousands of solo scenes compared to a few hardcore scenes. For example You can't compare 1,000 solo scenes' downloads to 100 hardcore scene's downloads(not going for exact numbers). That's terrible data and research. This is learned at an undergraduate level.

---

Huh? Where is the logic in that? If solo scenes were unpopular people wouldn't be joining Shemale Yum, LadyboyLadyboy, Black-Tgirls, Shemale Strokers, Bob'sTgirls etc and membership to Shemale Pornstar, Tgirlpinups, etc would be going through the roof. It's YOU that has the terrible research - it's purile. I'm not measuring 1000 downloads against 100 hardcores, I'm measuring ratios and choices on what people are joining and spending their money on - and THAT is the only relevant data to this business.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

Porn producers also say that straight men buy TS porn. Something is wrong with this data. Straight men do not watch straight solo porn. They watch hardcore porn. Hardcore porn is in high demand among straight men. That's why there are very few to none straight solo sites. It doesn't sell well.

---

Absolute rubbish. I've friends who own some of the biggest solo site companies in the world. You are talking out of your arse, again.

After reading this interesting and entertaining discussion, I do think the producers of content have to understand that they cannot please everyone. Its just the part of making something that people are able to judge. If someone thinks the models are not what they like to see or the standard of content is not up their standards, thats life. A person is entitled to their opinion. At the end of the day sales speaks to a products sucesss. With every product their is room for improvement and critisim helps exposes possilbe weakness. I think the hardest part of critism is taking is listen to the things we don't like.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

Interesting.............why haven't SMC's owner and Shemale Stroker's own been invited to these panels? They've been a while for a long time as well and have success.

---

Go and ask them. I doubt SMC will particpate as they don't really get into the community in general but Sammi is a good guy. Maybe he's just too busy running his awesome website that has been around forever, made a fortune and contain almost all solo scenes! Shemale Strokers is a longtime sponsor of the Tranny Awards.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lifeisfiction

After reading this interesting and entertaining discussion, I do think the producers of content have to understand that they cannot please everyone. Its just the part of making something that people are able to judge. If someone thinks the models are not what they like to see or the standard of content is not up their standards, thats life. A person is entitled to their opinion. At the end of the day sales speaks to a products sucesss. With every product their is room for improvement and critisim helps exposes possilbe weakness. I think the hardest part of critism is taking is listen to the things we don't like.

---

You can never please everyone. You can try to please as many as you can, or you can focus on one specific group and try to cater just to them. That's not an issue. What is an issue is when one asshat, comes along and this isn't new, this has been going on for a couple of years at least, and thinks that his opinion is everyone's opinion. He refuses to listen to the professionals in the industry and refuses to accept that he's usually entirely incorrect and illogical.

Feedback is awesome which is why all of our sites have forums and every cancelling member gets quizzed on what we could do better. We've made massive improvements over the years due to this and tailored sites to the majority - but I refuse to bow or kowtow to the one or two individuals who are too ignorant or short sighted to listen to the facts. Every customer, is not always right. Some customers will never be pleased - and if I can't please them, then they should take their custom elsewhere.

lol - this thread is like a master class in customer service! If I need any PR tips I know where to turn :P

(btw, I agree with Seanchai about the models. No girl will appeal to everyone...)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

I'm just going to say this. You're very stupid. I'm not doing the same thing that Wendy did. I compared two companies' video quality. The samples are videos. Video quality and harcore/solo scenes are two different things. You can't compare them in the same manner. Wendy is improperly comparing solo dvds and hardcore dvds. Her sample has a major flaw. Neither dvd contains the same people. A correct sample must have the same girls in the solo dvd and in the hardcore dvd.

Please go to college. You're stupid.

---

You need to send that scholarship back or give Daddy his money back instead of squandering it on porn instead of an education. She is exactly right in what she is saying. You cannot compare TSSeduction to Shemale Yum? One is a Kink site specializing in BDSM style hardcore full length scenes and the other is a magazine style site, featuring solo and hardcores of new models, current stars and a wide ranges of transgenders. Entirely different markets and customers.
You're a clown!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by loveboof

lol - this thread is like a master class in customer service! If I need any PR tips I know where to turn :P

(btw, I agree with Seanchai about the models. No girl will appeal to everyone...)

---

Bella will be along in a minute and help out even further.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by seanchai

Very bad models? Alyssa Adams, Hazel Tucker, Jenna Rachels, Sofia Ferreira, Sofia Sanders, Acadia Veneer, Angela Skye, Natalie Foxx, Brielle Bop, Cristen Cristensen, Alina Apple, Eva Cassini, Megan, Scarlett, Gianna Riviera, Valerie Daniels, Karissima, Yazlene Reyes, Annalise Rose, Kimora Jade, Danika Dreamz, Venus Lux, Texi Trap, Khloe Reyes, Valerie Alamond ...

---

I'm not going to be rude and say anyone's name. You only listed a handful of the thousands of models. Some of the girls you mention are great quality models like Hazel Tucker, Jenna Rachels, and Acadia Veneer. However, most models on the site do not compare. I won't be listing any names about models who I think should not be in porn. Most of the models at Black T-Girls should not be near porn a studio. Most of them are not close to Natassia Dream's and Paris's league.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by seanchai

I don't want my company to be criticized, I strife to be the best and I think we attain it. As stated, I'm the only company to offer this sort of discourse and allow feedback but if you start getting too obnoxious (and you're almost there) then you can fuck off and find a property we don't own to bitch on. I answer feedback all the time and often make changes on it - I'm not going to change our model line-up - based on what "Franklin" thinks is right, you're one mouth and you don't represent more than one mouth.

---

Oh so you only want praise? I understand that criticism can hurt even if there is no intentions to hurt someone. I criticize myself very often because I am not perfect. I flaws just like everyone else. It is a damn shame to think your company is perfect. No porn company is perfect. I can say a lot of good things about your site. I have some of the best customer service experiences with Grooby sites.

However, I also think the model quality at Shemale Yum is not always up to par. Most models are not in the same league as Hazel Tucker. More strongly, I think the model quality at Black T-Girls is terrible.

Thats what critism is, its never liked it can be constructive or destructive. Ebert reviews movies. Half the movies he likes I think are garbage. His opinions are touted as the voice for the masses (I am not saying that in this case that is what we are dealing with), but thats how is opinion treated. Franklin, is not going to accept your view nor is going to agree with it no matter how much evidence you present.

Here in lies the catch, a person's opinion will not always be liked. I would put money that they are people who feel they way he does, but will never say it.

Seanchai you are proud of your work and someone says something hurtful of course you will take it personally. You have to remember that anything that can be made critical will always invite those opinions. You can't please people all the time.

Time for an interlude .... bad looking girls just for Franklin!