Was the landing on the moon a fake?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RXrK...aynext_from=PL

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uU5Yy...132F02&index=5

....................................

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by muhmuh

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by trish

The conspiracy theory requires that rover technology in the late sixties be such that a NASA technician can remotely scoop up soil samples, pick up rocks, take pictures from different locations and perspectives, and oh yes deploy a mirror array.

---

wasnt all of that except the mirrors bit supposedly done in a studio?
also why deploy it? all the lander has to do is get down right way up and you could mount the reflector on top of it... a great engineering solution very much unlike bicycle pants

Quote:

---

The simplest explanation for the existence of the mirrors is the one given by NASA: the televised manned teams placed them there.

---

youre making the mistake of seeing the mirrors as part of an entire web instead of as isolated events for which compared to the massive combined mercury gemini and apollo effort a unmaned lander is a much simpler explanation

---

Groan.

Have you ever actually seen the mirrors. They are two foot wide and quite precisely angled so they reflect correctly. They took a lot of effort to both place and then adjust so they were at the right angle.

An Unmanned Lander is such a ludicrous explanation it's not funny. You are actually saying that 40 years ago man was able to build robots with the ability to operate in low gravity with absolute precision whilst being controlled from earth with massive time delays. Since footprints are evident around these arrays said robots also can apparently remove their tracks and replace them with artificial footprints. (although the footprints of course cant be seen from earth they are visable in the photos of the arrays)

If your theory is correct I expect Skynet to attack any moment because robotics would have reached a Terminator level of AI at this point. WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE ... HELP ME ...OH GOD!

The Mars landers proved ust how difficult it is today to control rovers. To suggest they would have been able to create and control rovers about 50 times more versatile than todays landers 40 years ago is frankly ridiculous.

There is a simple reason why we dont go back to the Moon with manned missions. It's expensive, inherently dangerous and ultimately useless unless we have more advanced technology than we currently possess. It's a dead rock and unless we are intending to build a telescope, moonbase or other high cost hish risk mission what would be the point?

You may not want to believe that man landed on the moon but overwhelming physical evidence exists that we in fact did and the loopy conspiracy theories simply dont hold water on close examnation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by elizats

5) Soviets said bravo to NASA for what they have archive because nobody could do it. off course nobody couldn't that time nobody can't this time.

---

You should run for Congress.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by phobun

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by elizats

5) Soviets said bravo to NASA for what they have archive because nobody could do it. off course nobody couldn't that time nobody can't this time.

---

You should run for Congress.

---

LOL. He wuld be a smurt Conguessman who spells good.

Explain this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWkGT...eature=related

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ozma

Explain this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWkGT...eature=related

---

Heh. I think it should be captioned: "El Nino was here"

Look at the actual dipshit description:

"Normally it lasts 14min. What you see is the reason behind all this rush to land on the moon before USSR. It was bombed a few years later by those who decide for us. ufo aliens extraterrestrial base moon Apollo Armstrong space NASA"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bat1

What do you think?


Apollo Moon Landing hoax conspiracy theories
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Apollo Moon Landing hoax accusations)
Jump to: navigation, search
Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong in NASA's training mock-up of the Moon and lander module. Hoax proponents say the entire mission was filmed on sets like this training mock-up.
Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong in NASA's training mock-up of the Moon and lander module. Hoax proponents say the entire mission was filmed on sets like this training mock-up.

Apollo Moon Landing hoax conspiracy theories are claims that some or all elements of the Apollo Moon landings were faked by NASA and possibly members of other involved organizations. Some groups and individuals have advanced various theories which tend, to varying degrees, to include the following common elements:

* The Apollo Astronauts did not land on the Moon;
* NASA and possibly others intentionally deceived the public into believing the landing(s) did occur by manufacturing, destroying, or tampering with evidence, including photos, telemetry tapes, transmissions, and rock samples;
* NASA and possibly others continue to actively participate in the conspiracy to this day.

Many commentators have published detailed rebuttals to the hoax claims. A 1999 poll by the The Gallup Organization found that 89 percent of the US public believed the landing was genuine, while 6 percent did not and 5 percent were undecided.[1][2]
Contents

---

Absolutely, the lunar landing is fake. JFK and Elvis are actually still alive too, and Marylin is suckin' both of them off, on a regular basis. Oh yeah, I forgot, you're actually a multi-millionaire!!! So, go to the bank and tell them to give you your dough!

Explain what? It's a link to a shitty video on Youtube. Are we to assume that you get your facts from Youtube videos?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ozma

Explain this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWkGT...eature=related

---

The REAL question these days is whether or not the Chinese faked their little "space walk" .... check on the web and see the flaws in the video of it - such as the apparent "bubbles" coming out of the helmet. Some nuts are suggesting that the entire "space walk' was done in a water tank. It's interesting to look at the video.

I suggest a few of you non-believers take an astronomy 101 class.