Republican Cites Biblical Flood as Evidence Against Man-Made Climate Change - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pdgk3NGvdAA
Printable View
i think from the first graph in your second link its pretty clear that global warming papers cause climate change
Carbon bubble will plunge the world into another financial crisis – report:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environmen...l-crash-crisis
How Big Business Secretly Robs America with a Powerful Trick:
How Big Business Secretly Robs America with a Powerful Trick - YouTube
Good news -- for a change -- :)
MUST SEE! 1st County in U.S. Bans Oil & Gas Extraction - YouTube
I love sudo religious environmentalists , they should be standing on corners with placards "THE END IS NIGH ,HONEST JUST GIVE A FEW BILLION AND MY COMPUTER WILL PROVE IT" Oh wait they are :confused::confused::confused:
And computer models DO INDEED PROVE that the Earth's climate is suffering from a energy imbalance due primarily to infrared opaque gasses in the atmosphere that were released by relatively recent anthropogenic mechanisms. The end of life on Earth may not be nigh, nor even the end of human life. But the extra energy in the atmosphere will create more tumultuous weather events, push ecological systems further toward the poles, and turn once arable land into arid deserts. Concomitant with these modifications will be geographic shifts in economic and political power. These are not the ravings of a prophet waving a sacred book. These are the considered, published and peered reviewed conclusions of mathematical and scientific analysis based on carefully collected data and carried out by hundreds of intelligent, educated professionals.
It's the deniers who are the religious zealots here, waving Ayn Rand, invoking invisible hands and denying the results of science when they happen to disagree with their favorite idiot-ologies.
I wouldn't call them pseudo religious environmentalists. They are what they are: scientists.Quote:
Originally Posted by surf4490
As opposed to religious belief. Which is simply based on irrational conviction. I mean, you can disbelieve climate change. Just because you don't think it's true.
I mean, I can say the moon is made outta cheese. And firmly believe it. That isn't based on science. Just my belief. And, again, I can profoundly believe it. But I'd be wrong. So, again, people can believe what they want to believe.
I mean, we can take no action. But say the scientists are right. Then what?
MIT climate scientist Kerry Emanuel:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12kMjUkNl5Y
Fine Particulate Air Pollution and the Progression of Carotid Intima-Medial Thickness: A Prospective Cohort Study from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution:
http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/...l.pmed.1001430