Re: Gay for Pay- Trans for Pay ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nysprod
Ridiculous, Jamie did some hot scenes and looked great doing them...who cares about labels...and it wouldn't surprise me to know that Britney dissed her sister publically because Jamie is ten times hotter with maybe a tenth of the effort.
It doesn't change the fact Jamie wasn't trans and only did trans for pay. Jamie is a man and as customer I do not want men pretending to be trans. I expect TS woman at TS sites. I pay for TS porn so companies should only shoot TS women. Don't give me bullshit. I am not a gay man. I don't want to see a crossdresser or a man pretending to be trans with a terrible wig on his head.
What if a person joins a gay site and all of a sudden there is a genetic female in the scene? Something is would be wrong. The gay person did not join a gay site to see a female. He joined to see men.
What if a straight guy joined Brazzers and they shoot a gay scene? Nobody joins Brazzers for gay porn because it is a straight company. It would be highway robbery.
Re: Gay for Pay- Trans for Pay ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TSPornFan
It doesn't change the fact Jamie wasn't trans and only did trans for pay. Jamie is a man and as customer I do not want men pretending to be trans.
What are you going to do, pay for a psych report for every model before you tug ya budgie?
Re: Gay for Pay- Trans for Pay ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TSPornFan
What if a person joins a gay site and all of a sudden there is a genetic female in the scene?
They'll die of shock! :hide-1:
Or possibly give that scene a miss, and go jack off to the rest of the site. :shrug
Go on kukm4, you know ya wanna!
Re: Gay for Pay- Trans for Pay ?
as much as i hate to agree with franklin..."jamie markham" is exactly the kind of performer i am referring to. jamie was clearly a boy in a dress and no different than lexx parker or stonie...a boy that looks good in drag. the difference outside of the porn they filmed between "jamie" and lexx on one side vs stonie on the other is that stonie decided to have FFS and breast implantation and is living as a woman now.
other than jamie, there are many popular tranny porn models that fall into this category of "boy in a dress" but the wedge difference is that only TIME can tell if these models are trans-for-pay or serious about becoming the women they dress up to be. if over time a model never takes any legal, psychological and medical steps to transition and only dresses the part, trans-for-pay seems a most appropriate term.
Re: Gay for Pay- Trans for Pay ?
I'm sure Lisa Lawer was trans-for-pay. She went back to being a man after leaving the porn business.
Re: Gay for Pay- Trans for Pay ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TSPornFan
It doesn't change the fact Jamie wasn't trans and only did trans for pay. Jamie is a man and as customer I do not want men pretending to be trans. I expect TS woman at TS sites. I pay for TS porn so companies should only shoot TS women. Don't give me bullshit. I am not a gay man. I don't want to see a crossdresser or a man pretending to be trans with a terrible wig on his head.
What if a person joins a gay site and all of a sudden there is a genetic female in the scene? Something is would be wrong. The gay person did not join a gay site to see a female. He joined to see men.
What if a straight guy joined Brazzers and they shoot a gay scene? Nobody joins Brazzers for gay porn because it is a straight company. It would be highway robbery.
OMG if you're so concerned about who gets into what for why, how about all of the many many trans girls who do a few shoots or vids and then get sick of the whole thing and stop aka trans girl who did porn for pay and then quit.
Re: Gay for Pay- Trans for Pay ?
Much like sexuality, maybe gender is a spectrum as well. This can be a touchy subject. I've known some gay men who, I don't know how to say this, just didn't seem like men. I'm not saying they were any less of men, or that all gay men fit this profile. But the way they spoke, their mannerisms, how they dressed, how they walked, it struck me as a combination of male and female. Is this a learned behavior, gay culture, is or there something else going on? I really don't know.
Re: Gay for Pay- Trans for Pay ?
I hate to agree with Franklin but on this one I do. If a TS shows up for a scene and she is still a boy and then goes into bathroom to put up a wig, makeup, lingerie, etc - well thats not a TS, thats a CD. I consider TS girls ones who are girls, live as girls, think of themselves as girls, and want to be a girl 24/7/365. Just my 2 cents.
Re: Gay for Pay- Trans for Pay ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vladimir Putin
I'm sure Lisa Lawer was trans-for-pay. She went back to being a man after leaving the porn business.
Actually, I believe she went back to being a man after she got a girl pregnant and some family pressure...At least that's what I had heard.
Re: Gay for Pay- Trans for Pay ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
christianxxx
I hate to agree with Franklin but on this one I do. If a TS shows up for a scene and she is still a boy and then goes into bathroom to put up a wig, makeup, lingerie, etc - well thats not a TS, thats a CD. I consider TS girls ones who are girls, live as girls, think of themselves as girls, and want to be a girl 24/7/365. Just my 2 cents.
I can understand that point of view from a performer. I hate it when TS' s post their pretransition pics. It usually turns me off. That said , I dont care how the girls I watch live while not on the set. I think Jamie Markham's hot. I dont know if the escorts Ive seen live as women all the time either and I dont think about it. For those who do (fans), would you care so much if you just spanked to films and didnt spend half your day on porn forums? I dont care to see the whole process of my food being prepared either.
