Printable View
Franklin I own a DVD PRODUCTION COMPANY, I am speaking of DVD sales not my website sales.
Number/Stats are my SALES , how many stores order, how many reorders, how much VOD sales, how many out the door etc. Ive done this 11 years and had my DVD company for 8, I assure you I know what Im speaking about when it comes to SALES as I get the numbers monthly from my distributor.
I don't mind criticism and I'll answer it a point at a time ... but what's the point, you absolutely refuse to believe that you can possibly be incorrect in anything you say about porn. I have the facts and the numbers. Why is a site that is mainly solo (Shemale Yum) more successful than other hardcore sites featuring the same models.
YOU are WRONG!!
I was just bout to say that. Another good example is Keira Verga. How many people want to see her do hardcore but settle for joining her site just to see her walk around in a neglige.
Quote:
Originally Posted by seanchai
Brand loyalty, familiarity perhaps. Regular coka-cola will always sell more than its subsidiaries.
Not to be combative but I think I know why that is...
You're not understanding what I am saying at all. A stats researcher would not accept your information. As I said properly done research requires that the same girls in the solo dvd must also be in the hardcore dvd to compare them.Quote:
Originally Posted by WendyWilliams
If you release a solo DVD featuring Kimber James, Bailey Jay, and Sarina Valentina then you should expect better sales than a hardcore DVD featuring less popular models. You can't compare the two. Your data is invalid.
That is just basic research.
You're not open to criticism. I said your site Shemale Yum has very bad quality models. You lied and said that I slandered them. You also stated that you do not want your company to be criticized.Quote:
Originally Posted by seanchai
You say solo scenes are more popular and are downloaded much more. Well duh! There is so much solo content that its going to be downloaded much more. You thousands of solo scenes compared to a few hardcore scenes. For example You can't compare 1,000 solo scenes' downloads to 100 hardcore scene's downloads(not going for exact numbers). That's terrible data and research. This is learned at an undergraduate level.Quote:
Originally Posted by seanchai
Porn producers also say that straight men buy TS porn. Something is wrong with this data. Straight men do not watch straight solo porn. They watch hardcore porn. Hardcore porn is in high demand among straight men. That's why there are very few to none straight solo sites. It doesn't sell well.
Like arguing with the town drunk LOL
I think common sense says that a top tgirl model in a hardcore vid will sell more than the same girl in a solo jack vid.
You guys are so correct, what does Seanchai or I know about Dvd sales or websites.
Back to subject at hand.
Good lord you're a sanctimonious prick. If I wasn't out shooting a scene for my site at the moment and having to type this on my Surface, I'd shred your supposed logic and reduce you to a bumbling fool...oh wait, you've already done that last part.Quote:
Originally Posted by FRANKLIN
Since I am not at my desktop with a proper keyboard, I'll just sum this up with three words: Dita Von Teese.
You don't know anything about basic research. What you have said is so wrong that it is not funny. Go to a college and tell them that you're comparing two different people in two different types of porn. One in solo and another person in a hardcore. They would tell you that your data does not prove that solo scenes sell better than hardcore scenes.Quote:
Originally Posted by WendyWilliams
Has anybody from your production company went to college and taken both Statistics and Methods of Research courses?