Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
;)wow you sure did stir up a cloud of flies with that one
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Well since we are putting simplistic pics on here, I might as well get in on it.
http://dangerousintersection.org/wp-...ain-lo-res.jpg
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Erika1487
The liberal mind's Playbook & flow chart
What a simplistic load of horse manure.
Thanks for reflecting what a dumb ass I am for expressing anything about this area of my thoughts here.
Clever? Anywhere near smart? Nope.
Ultra Stupid? Immature and hypocritical? Yep....
I was under the impression this is a sex and lifestyle forum...
Instead I find a ton of lonely heart red neck hucksters...
Best part of the 1st amendment is individuals unwittingly reveal their shallow adolescent intellect.
Thanks.
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
god bless Australian we hate all this socialist rubbish,our prime minister is only polling 23 percent ,the lowest in our history
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Silcc, that there is some funny shit..
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silcc69
Well since we are putting simplistic pics on here, I might as well get in on it.
LMAO! Hilarious but disturbingly accurate...
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
i like Obama he home brews beer
2 Attachment(s)
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stavros
The chart falls apart from the start. Leaving aside the arcane notion that Lenin was not a Marxist (because his understanding of Marx's critique of capitalism was as faulty as his own spurious The Development of Capitalism in Russia [1899]); the idea that revolutionary agitators either wait for the masses to revolt or for the capitalist system to fall apart is simply wrong.
Thus, the Bolsheviks seized power in October 1917 and used their superior form of organisation to take control of the chaotic conditions that prevailed in the main urban areas of Russia, having made various attempts to 'rouse the workers from their slumber' since the failed revolution of 1905. This is a complex history because it involves the leadership skills of Lenin and Trotsky as much as the failure of the liberal groups in Russia, initially led by Kerensky, to achieve what the Bolsheviks did. Moreover, by the end of the civil war in 1923, the Bolsheviks had consolidated power and the Communist Party remained in control until 1991 -yes, it was a failure as an economic political and social system, but the revolutionary vanguard did succeed and not fail as the chart implies -the consequences of Leninism for the European left after 1917 were devastating -Spain alone being a grim example.
Another failure: China: From the countryside to the city encapsulated Mao's strategic perspective: build communism in the countryside by challenging landlords and corruption, by placing cadres in control of villages where they demonstrated their humility and honesty -a strategy that worked, the Communist Party is still in power in China whatever you think of the economy, and the way in which the rural cadres who were exemplary in the 1940s were replaced by cronyism and corruption, as happens with systems that don't change.
If the chart can't get basic history right, what is its point?
I don't see how Post-Modernism is connected to terrorism when post-modernism in its 'pure' form leads to atrophy and indifference not militant activity; Prospero's remark on multi-culturalism needs no further elaboration, and the chart makes a claim that its assumed alternative is in every way better without explaining how 'the richest country in the world' now counts 1 in 6 people as poor: if capitalism is so successful, how is this success to be measured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Prospero
That chart is utterly inane....
To pick up on just one half-assed assertion that those who embrace multiculturalism believe that" all cultures are to be respected except Western culture which is uniquely bad." An allegation thrown at liberals which is totally without foundation from the Glen Beck school of asinine prejudice and Goebbelspeak.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BluegrassCat
Wow, really compelling argument, Erika. Don't strain yourself hitting copy & paste. Just drink the Kool-aid and pass it on.
And in case you weren't paying attention, capitalism DID collapse in September 2008 and had to be bailed out by government.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NaughtyJane
What a simplistic load of horse manure.
Thanks for reflecting what a dumb ass I am for expressing anything about this area of my thoughts here.
Clever? Anywhere near smart? Nope.
Ultra Stupid? Immature and hypocritical? Yep....
I was under the impression this is a sex and lifestyle forum...
Instead I find a ton of lonely heart red neck hucksters...
Best part of the 1st amendment is individuals unwittingly reveal their shallow adolescent intellect.
Thanks.
Well now that I have your attention........
Let me state this in very S....I.....M....P....L....E Layman's terms.
Liberalism & socialism are like canned tomatoes for instance at walmart they come in 15 different varieties and sizes, but the basic element, what lumps them all in the same isle of the
grocery store is that they are all canned tomatoes.
As most of you know I work for the Republican party by day, it's my job to throw all the canned tomatoes in the pot and make a damn good chili ;)
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol