Beagle, you made my day! Jesus H. Christ! I'm laughing so fucking hard, tears are rolling in fucking sheets down my fucking cheeks! That's the fucking way it shoulda-been. Fuck-Fabulous Article.
Printable View
Beagle, you made my day! Jesus H. Christ! I'm laughing so fucking hard, tears are rolling in fucking sheets down my fucking cheeks! That's the fucking way it shoulda-been. Fuck-Fabulous Article.
+1Quote:
Originally Posted by trish
Och, let him have his wee bit fun; he and his chums have just been so roundly whupped in the debate, there's nothing else they can do to cover their embarrassment.Quote:
Originally Posted by sockmonkey
Not embarrassed, angry, mostly at myself for posting something without evaluating the "gang up" potential. "those that forget the past are doomed to repeat its mistakes."
ROFLOL the paranoia never stops with you, does it?Quote:
Originally Posted by thx1138
Quote:
Originally Posted by thx1138
Gang-up nothing. You posted something that made so little sense that I couldn't have replicated it if I were drunk. If MacShreach were to post something that incoherent, I'd rip him for it too. The odds of that are accordingly small, granted, but I give no preferential treatment on the basis of being or not being an idiot. Only if you continually demonstrate that you are or are not an idiot.
Well, I guess this proves the astronauts made it to the mooon. They planted this statue. Probably because they had a bizarre sense of humor: http://thecrit.com/2009/05/05/200000...found-on-moon/ I have no idea if this is BS or not. I haven't been able to find a second reference.
He can determine a person's IQ just by reading postings on a transexual chatboard. Must have come from a long line of smart people. :D
It looks like it IS bull shit: http://weeklyworldnews.com/alien-ale...-moon/#respond
With unimpeachable sources like that, I don't know how we ever doubted you... :smhQuote:
Originally Posted by thx1138
Quote:
Originally Posted by thx1138
Exactly. You can obviously tell what a thoughtful person I am from this photo. You'll note the playful expression and the contemplative pose: it informs the viewer of my philosophical nature and self-deprecating sense of humour, yet suggests I'm not nearly enough of a brainless prick to feebly attempt insult with funny pictures. In case you were wondering, I really think I look like my mother in this picture, particularly in relation to the body hair.
You actually thought there may have been some validity to that story? Did you wonder why the story did not make it on the front page of every newspaper in the world or the top of the evening news? Pretty pathetic.Quote:
Originally Posted by thx1138
Bwaaaaahhhhahahahahahahahahhaha
He gets his stuff from the Weekly World News!!!
God that's so funny.
"proves the astronauts made it to the moon"... "no idea if this is BS or not"... unable to find a "second reference".... hahaha. Funniest thing I've read in days... hahaha. ROFL.Quote:
Originally Posted by thx1138
The Simpsons already did it, thx1138!
http://www.southparkstudios.com/clip...Already+Did+It
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_the_Skeptic
Skepticism: doubt about the truth of something; a method of obtaining knowledge through systematic doubt and continual testing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skepticism
Oh, the irony...
I originally picked this up from what i thought was a reputable guy - one whom I thought did fact checking. I checked further ( the original source) and of course it smelled to high heaven. I'll stop when you stop hitting me with ad hominem attacks. You're the ones that are acting like 9 year old school kids. Name calling? - for God's sake grow up. You're adults now. It's time your brains caught up with your bodies.
He was probably having fun at your expense. In any case, a story like that would have made headlines around the world, you would not have heard it from a guy. There would have been non-stop news coverage.Quote:
Originally Posted by thx1138
Hey guys-- take a look at this! Maybe ol' THC's onto something after all!
Mac, that looks possible, I don't know. I'm going to have to double check that one, give me a few minutes. :wink:Quote:
Originally Posted by MacShreach
You have to start being observant and critical of not only the government, but everyone including YOURSELF.Quote:
Originally Posted by thx1138
You incite name calling by your obsessive paranoia, persistent fear-mongering, and general feeble mindedness, thx1138.Quote:
Originally Posted by thx1138
Hypocrisy: the act of being less critical of oneself than of others.
http://www.hungangels.com/board/view...light=chefmike
You might have something there, Mac. The plane may have been involved in an early barium-seeding experiment carried out by the Illuminati for the forthcoming New World Order, and flew just a bit too high. Seems they've also started experimenting with more natural disperal mechanisms...Quote:
Originally Posted by MacShreach
In responding to the most asked questions about the hoax (#10. Fluttering Flag: The American flag appears to wave in the lunar wind.
#9. Glow-in-the-Dark Astronauts: If the astronauts had left the safety of the Van Allen Belt the radiation would have killed them.
#8. The Shadow Knows: Multiple-angle shadows in the Moon photos prove there was more than one source of light, like a large studio lamp.
#7. Fried Film: In the Sun, the Moon's temperature is toasty 280 degrees F. The film (among other things) would have melted.
#6. Liquid Water on the Moon: To leave a footprint requires moisture in the soil, doesn't it?
#5. Death by Meteor: Space is filled with super-fast micro meteors that would punch through the ship and kill the astronauts.
#4. No Crater at Landing Site: When the Lunar Excursion Module (LEM) landed, its powerful engine didn't burrow a deep crater in the "dusty surface."
#3. Phantom Cameraman: How come in that one video of the LEM leaving the surface, the camera follows it up into the sky? Who was running that camera?
#2. Big Rover: There's no way that big moon buggy they were driving could have fit into that little landing module!
#1. Its Full of Stars!: Space is littered with little points of lights (stars). Why then are they missing from the photographs? )
Here is NASA's response
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/TECH/sp...oon/index.html
NASA should be giving us more information than that. I seen better rebuttals on this thread than NASA's effort.
Landing was not a fake... but the images was
They recently had a Mythbusters o Discovery Channel that addressed the "Lunar Wind", "Light in the Dark side of the Lunar Lander", "Footprint", "Walking-on-the-moon Stop-Time theory" and "Multiple Light Source" conspiracy theories and they were actually able to debunk all of those myths. Additionally, they fired a laser from an observatory to the moon and got negative returns except at the one coordinate where the astronauts placed a sophisticated mirror array that returns light from any angle, proving that there is a man-made object on the moon.
It's a pretty good show anyways, but that was a particularly interesting episode.
(sigh)Quote:
Originally Posted by scorpion
1 Actually read this thread
2 Eat your hat
3 End of this exchange
10. The flag was threaded with rods to try and force a fluttering appearance.Quote:
Originally Posted by deee757
9. That's what full EVA Suits are for. How do you think astronauts on the Space Shuttle take their "space walks"?
8. From the surface of an object that has no atmosphere, has a highly reflective surface and has another astral body between it and the sun, that's going to happen.
7. Yes...those scientists down here on Earth could not have possibly made materials to withstand that kind of heat <eye roll>
6. Nope...you can leave a pretty good print in dry sand or soil...especially in a place that has one-sixth the gravity of Earth.
5. There are not sheets of "micro-meteors" covering the blanket of space. Ever hear of a thing called telemetry?
4. Why would it?
3. Hmm...yes...no such thing as automation....
2. Ever head of modular units?
1. For the same reason you don't see a sky full of stars while in the middle of L.A. but see zillions of them if you go up in the mountains: too much light.
Now, here's a little question that all these conspiracy lovers have yet to answer: Why the hell would we want to fake a moon landing? So NASA could get more money? Nonsense...they are already a government agency, the government would have to be in on it. To one-up our Russian comrades because the Cold War was on? Again, nonsense. If this really was a hoax, Russian scientists would have been able to spot this immediately...AND taken great delight in exposing that fact to EVERYONE.
So, again, I ask....why?
When you conspiracy lovers come up with rational reason for a fake moon landing, only then will I even consider you to possess rationality.
again, that's more information than NASA has provided, no matter how vague your answers were.
The so-called "lunar rocks" are obvious fakes, as the moon is actually made of cheese:
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/I...e_of_cheese%3F
ROFLOLQuote:
Originally Posted by xact
I was about to say something like "Jesus are you kidding--this thread still going on?"
But that made me laugh.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
I think the cheese theory and the actual moon landing theory are running neck and neck
deee writesDon't you mean CNN should be giving us more information than that? So CNN doesn't devote enough time or space to the moon landing conspiracy theory and it's NASA's fault!? How does that work? Do you have green cheese for brains? Have mice been gnawing on it?Quote:
In responding to the most asked questions about the hoax ...Here is NASA's response
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/TECH/sp...oon/index.html
NASA should be giving us more information than that. I seen better rebuttals on this thread than NASA's effort.
Did you ever ask yourself why the flag is floating and blowing around when there is no air on the moon? yeah think about thatQuote:
Originally Posted by KellyShore
Did you ever bother reading the entire thread? The flag issue has been answered a number of times. :roll:Quote:
Originally Posted by superjoe2
there is no wind on the Moon :shock:Quote:
Originally Posted by superjoe2
This argument could be proven very easily... use a high powered telescope and look for an American Flag on the moon. As for the power of the telescope required, I'm not sure due to the fact that I'm not an astronomer... If it requires the Hubble, we'll were all S.O.L on that one.
The surface of the Moon is roughly 376000 kilometers from the surface of the Earth at their closest points. Two points on the surface of the Moon one yard apart from each other would subtend an angle of 1yard/376000km =0 .00000000243 radians = 0.0000000696 degrees = 0.00025 seconds of arc. The Lunar Lander itself might subtend angle of one order of magnitude higher, say 0.0025 seconds of arc. So what is the resolution of our best telescopes? The Hubble has a resolution of about 0.1 seconds of arc. Even given it’s slightly closer proximity to the Moon, even Hubble wouldn’t be able to confirm the presence of the Lunar Lander, let alone the flag. Future missions to the Moon, which a currently under preparation may be able to observe it from lunar orbit.
But let's suppose we could build a telescope with the resolving power to confirm the presence of the Lunar Lander on the Moon. I don't think it would resolve the issue. The conspiracy theorists will just take the same position the Catholic bishops took against Galileo, namely they will claim the telescope was designed to decieve.
[Addendum: More accurately Hubble has a resolution of approximately 0.0175 seconds of arc. An object on the Moon less than 32 meters across would be an dot with indistinguishable extension.]
[edits are in square brackets]
Quote:
Originally Posted by dan_drade
Genocide vs. landing on the moon good one. I think it was faked.
Sincerely,
Didn't vote for obama
Good to know another idiot who didn't vote for Obama. No one wants the endorsement of a Moon landing conspiracy theorist.Quote:
Originally Posted by jordyd19
I mean,who really gives a fuck who you did or didn't vote for.Quote:
Originally Posted by jordyd19
now I get it , the landing on the moon was a conspiracy made by Obama :twisted: :wink:Quote:
Originally Posted by jordyd19