So real men don't drink Bud Light?

This never gets old about why you should call out or stand against them, was a punk and skinhead (ska skinhead not the other type)
https://www.upworthy.com/bartender-e...thering-anyone

From the UK and bud light isn't even classed as a beer

So far, neither mildcigar or anyone else has bothered to defined what the "radical trans agenda" is. I suspect that's because there is no such thing, and that mildcigar and his co-ideologists are just using this emotion-packed word (radical) to rile folks up. And "agenda" -- this implies that trans-people and those who respect them have a (hidden) agenda: there's this secret plot to -- what? Again, an emotion-bearing word with no actual meaning.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mildcigar_2001

I think I have general sympathy for transsexuals as a group.

I assume that having gender dysphoria is a hard row to hoe.

I think the opinions expressed by me in this forum and in public for that matter generally support the best interests of transsexual community. I'm sure a good number of my opinions go against the current trans orthodoxy, but that doesn't make me wrong or a hater of transsexuals.

---

Truly no lower form of scum than someone who opposes civil rights for the people they jack off to. Creeps like this should be banned.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by broncofan

You said "I don't think a majority of them hate trans folks." Yet here they are boycotting a beer brand not because of anything controversial but because a transsexual is part of a promotional campaign. That's it.

Yet the only issue here is whether a transgender woman should be part of a promotional campaign.

---

This is the typical bullshit slight of hand. Have a problem with Dylan essentially acting as a female caricature, highlighting stereotypes we were all told were wrong? You must be a BiGoT.

It's so transparent and tiresome.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by filghy2

I could maybe understand the woke agenda argument if they had partnered with a trans rights activist. However, the only controversial thing about Dylan Mulvaney seems to be the fact that she's trans.

---

Yawn. More of the same absolute gaslighting.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dirkmcgee

This is the typical bullshit slight of hand. Have a problem with Dylan essentially acting as a female caricature, highlighting stereotypes we were all told were wrong? You must be a BiGoT.

It's so transparent and tiresome.

---

Right, so in your view these people are kicking up a stink about Dylan Mulvaney because they object to inappropriate stereotyping of trans?

Nice straw man attempt though. Your concern sounds very sincere.

As you said, transparent and tiresome.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Del06

So far, neither mildcigar or anyone else has bothered to defined what the "radical trans agenda" is.

---

He has defined "woke" though. "Woke" is anything he doesn't like.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by filghy2

Right, so in your view these people are kicking up a stink about Dylan Mulvaney because they object to inappropriate stereotyping of trans?

Nice straw man attempt though. Your concern sounds very sincere.

As you said, transparent and tiresome.

---

They object to Dylan's inappropriate objectifying and stereotyping of women.

They probably also object to Dylan's assertion that men can menstruate.

Acting as though Dylan isn't incredibly problematic destroys any shred of credibility.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thombergeron

Truly no lower form of scum than someone who opposes civil rights for the people they jack off to. Creeps like this should be banned.

---

I disagree. As long as they are not stooping to overt nastiness, I think it's better to let them have their say and then confront their views and try to force them to be accountable. That usually demonstrates that their arguments are flimsy, as we've seen here.