Climate change could mean the extinction of our species

there is no global warming just cooling yah dicks

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by russtafa

fuck you lot and your bullshit

---

Perhaps, extinction of the species would have some advantages. Gives evolution a chance to start again.

well you wouldn't survive

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by martin48

Perhaps, extinction of the species would have some advantages. Gives evolution a chance to start again.

---

There are 200 species going extinct every single day. And we are but 1 of 30 million species.
We cannot continue to despoil the planet and live on it. Albeit we can make believe that we can destroy the planet and live on it as well.
Plus 90 percent of the big fish in the ocean are gone.
1,000 Americans die every single day from cancer.
I mean, it is kinda bleak, as it were.
But we can change.

Naomi Klein: 'If You Take Climate Change Seriously, You Have to Throw Out the Free-Market Playbook':

http://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/node/1053

Big-Fish Stocks Fall 90 Percent Since 1950, Study Says:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...shdecline.html

man made global warming is a farse designed to extract carbon taxes out of the general population despite what Al Gore preaches, if you wanna worry about the environment, then lets worry about nuclear power, GMOs, water pollution and gene splicing among other more serious threats

:Bowdown::Bowdown::Bowdown::Bowdown::Bowdown::Bowd own::Bowdown::Bowdown:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gouki

man made global warming is a farse designed to extract carbon taxes out of the general population despite what Al Gore preaches, if you wanna worry about the environment, then lets worry about nuclear power, GMOs, water pollution and gene splicing among other more serious threats

---

you got that right

Even though it's evident to every serious climatologist in the world that anthropogenic climate warming is a fact, you are correct that it's not as urgent a problem as water pollution. As far as GMOs, gene splicing and nuclear power are concerned, all three are practicable with the appropriate regulation and enforcement (or were you proposing to ban them altogether; i.e. extreme regulation)?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by trish

Even though it's evident to every serious climatologist in the world that anthropogenic climate warming is a fact, you are correct that it's not as urgent a problem as water pollution. As far as GMOs, gene splicing and nuclear power are concerned, all three are practicable with the appropriate regulation and enforcement (or were you proposing to ban them altogether; i.e. extreme regulation)?

---

and a great idea for taxing the sweat off the taxpayer ,a money maker fer sure

that's the objective of this carbon tax to tax the fuck out of everyone.nothing like taxing thin air lol

the Australian government is now considering silencing any debate about the carbon tax by passing a law forbidding any critism of it on newspapers ,radio, blogs or twitter