In Politics, blaming the other guy is key. How do you think Obama got elected?
Printable View
In Politics, blaming the other guy is key. How do you think Obama got elected?
Quote:
Originally Posted by trish
Not your party....lol. It was their surrogates in the press sending plane loads of reporters to Wasilla to comb through her old junior high year books, and every person she'd ever interacted with. I guess that's why they were too preoccupied to vet the other guy? Somethin' like that, I guess ! lmao
Naw, that's not how the liberal press did it. Why go to all that trouble (you know asking her trick questions like, "What newspapers do you read?") when the communists could just spy on Palin from the shores of Russia with their binoculars. LMAO@OMK-loser.
Hey you forgot to write 'lol'.....and while implicit in your gibberish you also forgot to mention 'Obama'. You're slipping...or maybe losing your mind? Did your left (or is that right) nut which got shaken loose from your HD still rolling around in your brain?Quote:
Originally Posted by onmyknees
Well thank goodness the media did a good job in exposing the ill-informed woman that Palin was. I guess it's not the job of the media to look under stones? And thank goodness also that they didn't bother with wasting time on the absurdities of the mythmaking birthers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by runningdownthatdream
What the fuck is your point? If it's an attempt at insult....you failed. I'm more amused than insulted. You're going to have to bring more than that. If your attempt was to insinuate anything I stated was inaccurate, you shouldn't be so obtuse....out with it. If your intent was to convey you're an Obama ass kisser and become prickly when anyone voices a contrary opinion, or evidence ... I think we already knew that, no newsflash there. You're a card carrying member of the 99.9 %ers in here........so what exactly was your point? Inane and lame are the words that come to mind......
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prospero
The question was regarding vetting. You missed the point entirely. Of course the presses job is to look under rocks, as you put it. I'm not so sure it's their job to question the DNA of a disabled child, but maybe they turn over more rocks in the UK. The point I was trying to make was that some got vetted, some got anointed. The vetting is now underway, albeit 4 years late. Perhaps that's why Bill Clinton referred to him as an "Amateur" which coincidently is the name of a New York Times Best seller. Is it on your reading list?
I hope I've clarified sufficiently.
If any media was in the business of anointing political leaders as if they were spiritual guides and demonizing others as if they were...well demons, it's FOX. Fair and balanced news my ass. Fair and balanced news networks don't pay for, produce and run political adds.
Oh yeah, LMAO.
[QUOTE=trish;1154184]If any media was in the business of anointing political leaders as if they were spiritual guides and demonizing others as if they were...well demons, it's FOX. Fair and balanced news my ass. Fair and balanced news networks don't pay for, produce and run political adds.
I won't defend that one show, that one instance....unlike you of course who will on the other hand defend all the bilge on MSNBC night after night where hosts make political ads, then play their own ads on their shows as they did in Wisconsin....or the defamation suit pending against one of the hosts. You're not a dumb person, unlike some on here so If you can't see media bias, you're either ignorant, ambivalent, or blinded by your ideology....there's simply no other explanation. And by all means, continue to believe what you wanna believe, and don't allow anyone to dislodge your from your fantasies. BTW...are you still having those recurring delusions about the impact and veracity of OWS ? Now that's funny !
Wrong again. I don't even watch msnbc. Have you ever seen a post by me defending msnbc? Link it loser.