Racist "pls no black guys" bullshit ho

With me it's not about complexion it's all about how much you look like a woman, how dominant you are and how freaky yo ass is! If you're Caucasian, African descent, Asian, Hispanic TGirl WE FUCKING AND WE FUCKING REAL HARD! I have this 6'2 sexy Hispanic TGirl she loves my ass to death. I cooked for her and my cooking was so good she just loves when I come over and chill. Some times we don't fuck we go out and hang and just chill, but she is nastier than a motha fucka in the bedroom, but she is kind and she loves the hell outta me and she even calls me up and say "PAPA COME OVER I HAVE SOME FOOD I COOKED ESPECIALLY FOR YOU' and I would go over and eat and some times leave without fucking her! But when we fuck IT'S OFF THE MOTHA FUCKING CHAIN! So I don't care all about that, smell good, look great and we fucking!

It's funny than a motha fucka, if this same TGirl told African descent men "LETS FUCK" I bet these motha fuckas wouldn't miss the opportunity they would be all up in that ass lol :dead: lol

Just like this TGirl I would eat her asshole and suck her cock she fine as a motha fucka!

http://img1.imagehousing.com/63/af24...d3d435f8e7.jpg

Would I pass up this Caucasian beauty? Hell no I would suck her cock and her tits she is a beauty queen!

http://img1.imagehousing.com/18/1de3...f149562a27.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Teydyn

I am sure she did all the operations, including becoming a TS only for YOU and not herself...

---

Who said anything about her becoming a TS?? Don't be a dumbass.
It's her criteria for seeing clients as an escort that I'm talking about.


Her look is going to attract BM. If you don't want to see Black clients, why try to look so hard like Kim K??:yayo:

Pronunciation: \ˈrā-ˌsi-zəm also -ˌshi-\
Function: noun
Date: 1933
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination
— rac·ist \-sist also -shist\ noun or adjective

Ok, we'll start with this. This is called a definition. Now when you idiots argue point to how this does or does not apply!
I knew not to look at this thread because it's always the same bullshit. Girl is racist but peoples PC factor won't let them call anyone that. Black or white, some of you are so ignorant--- you can't compare black people with chocolate chip cookies. Why? Because, BROTHER, you are making the same assumption the girl is, that there is something inherent in ALL black people that she knows she won't like. If you said cookies in general, maybe. Black people more than any other people here in America run the whole spectrum, because Mr Charlie calls you black if you got black blood in you.
I tire of this preference bullshit. That has nothing to do with it. So that's her only preference? She likes fat, smelly guys, midgets, lepers, as long as they're not black--- that's what you're saying because that's the only ones she made a point to write about! That's a helluva statement.
Trust me, your argument is more logical, but no less racist if you claim she just knows 9 out of 10 black guys ain't shit, like the racists pointed out!

And what the hell does fucking have to do with racism?? Massuh fucked plenty black bitches, he must not be racist. Strom Thurmond wasn't racist either

I like how a crazy racist posted a array of fuckery(using the N word),and the apologists don't say a word about that,huh....lol.They seem to not want to see the world for what it is......don't be afraid of confrontation.

Oh but I bet if someone doesn't like trannies, he's a homophobe, as if there's something he should be irrationally afraid of, but if you don't like blacks it's just your preference??!!! You can't have it both ways. Gee people who cry for open-mindedness can be quite close-minded!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jamesedwards

Ok, I am African descent, I don't use the term BLACKMAN, because I have never in my life seen a blackman and my COMPLEXION is not black, and using the word black is an European Caucasian word of status and identity which those of African descent people with Melanin never used from themselves. They used good personal names and went by their Sovereigned Nations. My own people need to stop using the word black in the first place, it's just like using the "N" word! The very word it's self means "GLOOMY, EVIL, DIRTY ETC" example, BLACK CATS ARE BAD LUCK, BLACK SUNDAY, etc. Also I have never seen a CAucasian person who is WHITE AS SNOW EITHER!

If I don't like chocolate chip cookies [...] Is it racist against the cookies?

---

I don't agree mate.

For starters, all humans are 'of African decent'. That is partly why racism is so ignorant.

But as for the terms - White/Black, they don't mean anything on their own. It's not racist to call someone black. We assign the meaning, and so you'd have to look at the context and intentions behind the words.

(As for cookie racism - lol. Bad example)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sucka4chix

Pronunciation: \ˈrā-ˌsi-zəm also -ˌshi-\
Function: noun
Date: 1933
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination
— rac·ist \-sist also -shist\ noun or adjective

Ok, we'll start with this. This is called a definition. Now when you idiots argue point to how this does or does not apply!
I knew not to look at this thread because it's always the same bullshit. Girl is racist but peoples PC factor won't let them call anyone that. Black or white, some of you are so ignorant--- you can't compare black people with chocolate chip cookies. Why? Because, BROTHER, you are making the same assumption the girl is, that there is something inherent in ALL black people that she knows she won't like. If you said cookies in general, maybe. Black people more than any other people here in America run the whole spectrum, because Mr Charlie calls you black if you got black blood in you.
I tire of this preference bullshit. That has nothing to do with it. So that's her only preference? She likes fat, smelly guys, midgets, lepers, as long as they're not black--- that's what you're saying because that's the only ones she made a point to write about! That's a helluva statement.
Trust me, your argument is more logical, but no less racist if you claim she just knows 9 out of 10 black guys ain't shit, like the racists pointed out!

---

Glad you put that up.
Again first of all OUR PEOPLE NEED TO STOP CALLING THEMSELVES BLACK THIS AND BLACK THAT! I already gave the definition and if you can show me one black person that looks like my black timberland boots then I will side with you. The darkest person on the planet is not even black, and who named us black? I can definitely say it wasn't US! So just kill that crap!

Now the definition the true definition of racism, your definition is partically right!

Racism: Noun 1655-1889
1. A Sovereign nation or a people that politically, economically, socially, and educationally DEPRIVE another race of the various four functions.

Proof, Slavery! A slave could not vote: POLITICAL!
A slave couldn't learn to read this was a law: Education
A slave didn't make money they worked for FREE! Economics
A slave was controlled by the slave owner and was made to
less than a human and was not allowed to deal with others
on a social level: SOCIAL!

European Caucasians used those four acts to control the slave, I can go into it even deeper but don't need to. Look up Code Noir and you will see exactly what I am talking about. The definition you gave is a facade! What I gave is a more in depth racist attitude and how it really functions on those four principles and if you say I am wrong Prove it!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by loveboof

I don't agree mate.

For starters, all humans are 'of African decent'. That is partly why racism is so ignorant.

But as for the terms - White/Black, they don't mean anything on their own. It's not racist to call someone black. We assign the meaning, and so you'd have to look at the context and intentions behind the words.

(As for cookie racism - lol. Bad example)

---

For one with the cookie statement it was kind of a joke that's why I LOL <---------.

Now when you say "We assign the meaning" WHO ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT ASSIGNED THIS MEANING? It wasn't the African descent people!

Now being you said we are all African descent, taken as a grain of salt with that one, because if that was true, why do Caucasians treat African descent people so wrong? Especially coming from a Caucasian Mason!

Hence the word Caucasian :ian: the suffix means BELONG TO, meaning Caucasians come from or belong to the Caucas mountains in Russia in Europe not Africa! Because if you are African descent as you say you are then there wouldn't be the need for Caucasian right? So you have to explain with logic and the original absolute truth and academic, critically analzyed explaination to how if you're Caucasian how you ended up in the Caucus mountains! Mirgrated out of the Caucus mountains into Egypt which was really called Kemet! Be very very careful and tread lightly on how you answer because I am very very very very knowledgeable on this subject!

The Mere fact that the TGirl chick has the right to like who she likes, why does it have to be racist?
I can see if she said "I WANT ALL WHITE GUYS AND NO NIGGERS" then it will be a serious problem!

If I said I want to screw a Caucasian TGirl does that make me racist? I gotta here this shit, lets skip the dam chocolate chip shit lets get into some real lingo here!

You know what I do when I see TGirls that say that? I MOVE THE FUCK ON AND SAY FUCK THEM! I ain't going to make a whole got dam thread about them they aint worth it!

Question if there was a CAucasian, African descent and a Hispanic having a 4 sum with a guy and they all fucked him in the ass and each one said "BOUNCE THAT BLACK ASS NIGGA" who would be the racist? :dead: lol hahahahah I gotta hear this one.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by giovanni_hotel

Don't be a dumbass
...
Her look is going to attract BM. If you don't want to see Black clients, why try to look so hard like Kim K??:yayo:

---

Now who is the dumbass?
She doesnt look the way she does to attract black men, but because she wants to look that way?

As a African American/black man I'd rather be seen as a man first than a race, but also people have to realize the difference between, racism, prejudice, and bigotry

If she dislikes black men because of physical features,that's a preference.If it's based upon preconceived notions about black men its racist.... prejudiced at best.What I can't wrap my mind around,is how you ignored the comments by mister white supremacy.....lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by doctor screw

If she dislikes black men because of physical features,that's a preference.If it's based upon preconceived notions about black men its racist.... prejudiced at best.What I can't wrap my mind around,is how you ignored the comments by mister white supremacy.....lol

---

Some people aren't worth the attention, I just report and put on ignore list

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RainMan

As a African American/black man I'd rather be seen as a man first than a race, but also people have to realize the difference between, racism, prejudice, and bigotry

---

:iagree: Concur totally. Some glump all 3 up into one when they are totally different. Some people just love doing that shit to sound good. You are right!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jamesedwards

For one with the cookie statement it was kind of a joke that's why I LOL <---------.

Now when you say "We assign the meaning" WHO ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT ASSIGNED THIS MEANING? It wasn't the African descent people!

Now being you said we are all African descent, taken as a grain of salt with that one, because if that was true, why do Caucasians treat African descent people so wrong? Especially coming from a Caucasian Mason!

Hence the word Caucasian :ian: the suffix means BELONG TO, meaning Caucasians come from or belong to the Caucas mountains in Russia in Europe not Africa! Because if you are African descent as you say you are then there wouldn't be the need for Caucasian right? So you have to explain with logic and the original absolute truth and academic, critically analzyed explaination to how if you're Caucasian how you ended up in the Caucus mountains! Mirgrated out of the Caucus mountains into Egypt which was really called Kemet! Be very very careful and tread lightly on how you answer because I am very very very very knowledgeable on this subject!

---

(I know you were joking with the cookies)

Homo Sapiens - which is the name for our species (ie Mankind, humanity, people, etc) evolved out of Africa.

Whether black or white, we all have the same ancestors!

There is no 'grain of salt' about where our species evolved. We are all 'of African decent'. As to why black people have been treated so wrongly, as I said that is due to ignorance. Education is the solution.

The meaning assigned to words is not simply a matter of who said what and when. It is a constantly evolving medium of communication.

When I said 'we' assign the meaning to our words, I mean exactly that.

The etymology of language is fascinating, but ultimately irrelevant. Words mean what we make them mean.

With this in mind, if I call a man 'black' - I am not necessarily being racist. To determine if I am racially prejudiced there are other factors that need considering. The word itself is not enough.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by loveboof

(I know you were joking with the cookies)

Homo Sapiens - which is the name for our species (ie Mankind, humanity, people, etc) evolved out of Africa.

Whether black or white, we all have the same ancestors!

There is no 'grain of salt' about where our species evolved. We are all 'of African decent'. As to why black people have been treated so wrongly, as I said that is due to ignorance. Education is the solution.

The meaning assigned to words is not simply a matter of who said what and when. It is a constantly evolving medium of communication.

When I said 'we' assign the meaning to our words, I mean exactly that.

The etymology of language is fascinating, but ultimately irrelevant. Words mean what we make them mean.

With this in mind, if I call a man 'black' - I am not necessarily being racist. To determine if I am racially prejudiced there are other factors that need considering. The word itself is not enough.

---

Now being you said that about the Homo Sapien, now if ALL of man evolved out of Africa, Caucasians included, when they first came on the scene in Africa to Egypt/Kemet with Herodotus why was it strange to them?

I use to live some where 20 years ago, moved and if I was to try and go back there while it is occupied can I still live there? can I still go there and take over as though when I once had it?

When you said "'we' assign the meaning to our words" I am not talking about words I am talking about the word "BLACK" to indentify African people. When slaves came from Africa they were called African slaves they were not called black or coloured, or negro or nigger etc until the usage of the European Caucasaian slave owner pronounced and put those labels on us. African meansing are totally different from European meanings. That's why it's so hard to translate words from those African languages into the bastard language English or the Queen's English. African's never called themselves black, this would be an oxymoron, because when CAucasians didn't exist in Africa what would they say? Oh I am blacker than the next African? Makes no sense.

Again I don't use the term black to describe myself, just like a very dark Dominican won't call themselves black, I understand this language is used as an art, the court system language is proof of that. So if a Dominican and I are the same dark complexion and he isn't black why would I call myself that? If a CAucasian person try and call me that I will correct them with the dam quickness! Caucasians made up the terms black, just like they made up the Term Africa, which is Greek meaning Land to the South which the original term lastly noted by the Kushites and Moors is Alkebulan! Ethiopia is not the name originally named for that place it's Kush! Egypt again named by Caucasians, the original name is Kemet, so again WHO IS NAMING my people? We didn't do it, all we did is take the name and keep them out of ignorance!

Russia is a weird place too with all the historical invasions and battles. I was always told we were products of Viking raping and pillaging but The Khans never got into our specific gene pool. Many Cossacks with fire red beards and wild eyes on my family tree. I was a 10 lb Ginger Baby myself.

LOOKS LIKE THEY ARE ENJOYING CHOCOLATE COCKS LIKE A MOTHA FUCKA LOL

http://img1.imagehousing.com/16/be8a...55ea22f2a1.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dino Velvet

Russia is a weird place too with all the historical invasions and battles. I was always told we were products of Viking raping and pillaging but The Khans never got into our specific gene pool. Many Cossacks with fire red beards and wild eyes on my family tree. I was a 10 lb Ginger Baby myself.

---

dAM i DIDN't want to even go there lol but you did.

Vikings, Vlad, Greeks, Romans, etc were barbaric can't even really describe how they were! Taking young boys and raping their bodies, little girls, splitting open pregnant women just to watch the fetus splash out their bellies I can go on but I don't want to because this isn't really the place for it, but weird aint the same, Woody Allen is weird, those dam Vikings and impailing people and so forth I don't think their is a definition to describe it you would have to see it !

My thing is if a Caucasian TGirl say she don't like so called black men just keep it moving, because their are a lot that do and they adore the dark body and would love to see their Ivory cocks slide in and out a dark azz!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jamesedwards

Now being you said that about the Homo Sapien, now if ALL of man evolved out of Africa, Caucasians included, when they first came on the scene in Africa to Egypt/Kemet with Herodotus why was it strange to them?

I use to live some where 20 years ago, moved and if I was to try and go back there while it is occupied can I still live there? can I still go there and take over as though when I once had it?

When you said "'we' assign the meaning to our words" I am not talking about words I am talking about the word "BLACK" to indentify African people. When slaves came from Africa they were called African slaves they were not called black or coloured, or negro or nigger etc until the usage of the European Caucasaian slave owner pronounced and put those labels on us. African meansing are totally different from European meanings. That's why it's so hard to translate words from those African languages into the bastard language English or the Queen's English. African's never called themselves black, this would be an oxymoron, because when CAucasians didn't exist in Africa what would they say? Oh I am blacker than the next African? Makes no sense.

Again I don't use the term black to describe myself, just like a very dark Dominican won't call themselves black, I understand this language is used as an art, the court system language is proof of that. So if a Dominican and I are the same dark complexion and he isn't black why would I call myself that? If a CAucasian person try and call me that I will correct them with the dam quickness! Caucasians made up the terms black, just like they made up the Term Africa, which is Greek meaning Land to the South which the original term lastly noted by the Kushites and Moors is Alkebulan! Ethiopia is not the name originally named for that place it's Kush! Egypt again named by Caucasians, the original name is Kemet, so again WHO IS NAMING my people? We didn't do it, all we did is take the name and keep them out of ignorance!

---

Omg dude. Use your brain! I appreciate that you feel passionately about this subject, but just think about what I'm saying for a second.

I'm talking about the birth of our species, and you're responding with questions about Egypt a few thousand years ago?!

As you have such an interest in this subject, I think you owe it to yourself to learn a little bit about the biological anthropology and paleoanthropology of our species. You discredit your whole argument with 'ifs' and 'buts' in regard to our evolution.

And you're totally right to refer to English as a bastard language. The reason for this is because it is ever evolving and adapting to our current usage and meaning. It is an amalgamation of many different languages and cultures, and continues to change as we live and speak it.

You're obsessing over a lot of completely irrelevant information.

http://www.xhamster.com/movies/19729...black_man.html

Good vid for yall lol hahahah

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jamesedwards

dAM i DIDN't want to even go there lol but you did.

Vikings, Vlad, Greeks, Romans, etc were barbaric can't even really describe how they were! Taking young boys and raping their bodies, little girls, splitting open pregnant women just to watch the fetus splash out their bellies I can go on but I don't want to because this isn't really the place for it, but weird aint the same, Woody Allen is weird, those dam Vikings and impailing people and so forth I don't think their is a definition to describe it you would have to see it !

---

You can go there. It's perfectly fine. I wish we could talk more honestly on matters as this. I don't really like The Cossacks in my family but I would bore you all to death if I told stories about The Dutch on my mom's side. Sominex, anyone?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by loveboof

Omg dude. Use your brain! I appreciate that you feel passionately about this subject, but just think about what I'm saying for a second.

I'm talking about the birth of our species, and you're responding with questions about Egypt a few thousand years ago?!

As you have such an interest in this subject, I think you owe it to yourself to learn a little bit about the biological anthropology and paleoanthropology of our species. You discredit your whole argument with 'ifs' and 'buts' in regard to our evolution.

And you're totally right to refer to English as a bastard language. The reason for this is because it is ever evolving and adapting to our current usage and meaning. It is an amalgamation of many different languages and cultures, and continues to change as we live and speak it.

You're obsessing over a lot of completely irrelevant information.

---

Oh so "use your brain" is that racist? Because I am African descent? HMmmmmmmmmmm

Dude! I have knowledge, the reason whey I mentioned Kemet/Egypt is because EUROPEANS HAVE NO HISTORY PRIOR TO EGYPT! The father of European history is Herodotus, if you can show me knowledge from The Caucus mountains and great monuments from there and spirituality then I will shut up. This is when Caucasians came on the scene and learned everything from Africans! So I know Anthro and Paleo all that good stuff with carbon dating etc, along with epigraphic evidence. So that's why I mentioned Egypt, Europe have no dedicated documentation prior Egypt and Herodotus said this. Who was a Greek Caucasian! So maybe you need to learn history and again Egypt is a misnomer the proper word is Kemet, or Tamerry or Sais, or Mizra'in! Before that was Kush!

So European civilizations was only basically A FEW THOUSAND YEARS AGO! and I am glad you said that because Africa is millions of years ago, they were smelting iron in Swaziland 50,000 years ago and where were the European Caucasians? NO WHERE ON THE SCENE THIS IS FACT IT'S NOT IF OR BUTS!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dino Velvet

You can go there. It's perfectly fine. I wish we could talk more honestly on matters as this. I don't really like The Cossacks in my family but I would bore you all to death if I told stories about The Dutch on my mom's side. Sominex, anyone?

---

I feel you on that, I can talk openly about it without feeling ashamed or inferior to someone's thoughts. But I understand you though, the Dutch? lol that's another history whew! lol I'll let you tell it if you would.

*smdh Take that beige dildo out of your pants, and free that little black "willy", big brain. I don't believe for a nanosecond that's how big you are.

the sweet - little willy HQ (with lyrics) - YouTube lol

And just what the fuck is a "inferior complexion racial complex"? Do you go out of your way to look retarded, or are you writing these posts from the special ed computer on Rykers? lol

Nice swishy font btw, fruity shorts. lol

__________________________________________________ ________________

Anyway, to the person who asked me on Facebook if I think James wrote this review? Duh-uh? lol Totally. Obviously. C'mon. He always inserts that "first of all" bullshit in every other post, and his motivations are as transparent as James Edwards' BVDs

And, James, I need no sockpuppets here, so shove your paranoid bullshit up your fat Wonderbread-shitting ass. The only person pissing on your grandparents' graves here is YOU, you Fred Flintstone lookin' attention whore. The girl who sent me the pic did't post it. I didn't post it. YOU posted it. Is your windpipe clogged with a Big Mac? No oxygen getting to that pea-brain? No one needs to make you look stupid, Hoss Cartwright. Altho' the Wicker Man certainly takes a decent stab at it. lol But you OWN the fucking role. lol Back off, WM. He's "large and in charge". LMAO
__________________________________________________ ____________________

That is all. Get back to your ghetto vs white trash cyber race war, and your 'wig on your football' crossdresser porn, you sad faggots.

As you were, homos.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jamesedwards

Oh so "use your brain" is that racist? Because I am African descent? HMmmmmmmmmmm

Dude! I have knowledge, the reason whey I mentioned Kemet/Egypt is because EUROPEANS HAVE NO HISTORY PRIOR TO EGYPT! The father of European history is Herodotus, if you can show me knowledge from The Caucus mountains and great monuments from there and spirituality then I will shut up. This is when Caucasians came on the scene and learned everything from Africans! So I know Anthro and Paleo all that good stuff with carbon dating etc, along with epigraphic evidence. So that's why I mentioned Egypt, Europe have no dedicated documentation prior Egypt and Herodotus said this. Who was a Greek Caucasian! So maybe you need to learn history and again Egypt is a misnomer the proper word is Kemet, or Tamerry or Sais, or Mizra'in! Before that was Kush!

So European civilizations was only basically A FEW THOUSAND YEARS AGO! and I am glad you said that because Africa is millions of years ago, they were smelting iron in Swaziland 50,000 years ago and where were the European Caucasians? NO WHERE ON THE SCENE THIS IS FACT IT'S NOT IF OR BUTS!

---

lol. No, telling you to 'use your brain' is not racist at all. The fact you're 'of African decent' is irrelevant to the fact that you're clearly either pretty stupid or just brain washed.

You're telling me that there were no people in Europe prior to the ancient Greek historian Heredotus? Did Greece just spring up the moment he stepped foot in it? Thats seems fairly implausible doesn't it?

But not quite as implausible as the notion that people were smelting iron 50,000 years ago. LOL!

Absolute nonsense. You're talking bullshit mate.

And why don't you visit Egypt and ask them what they want their country to be called. And for that matter, have you even been to Africa? It's weird that they're 'your' people but you choose to live in NYC...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jamesedwards

Oh so "use your brain" is that racist? Because I am African descent? HMmmmmmmmmmm

Dude! I have knowledge, the reason whey I mentioned Kemet/Egypt is because EUROPEANS HAVE NO HISTORY PRIOR TO EGYPT! The father of European history is Herodotus, if you can show me knowledge from The Caucus mountains and great monuments from there and spirituality then I will shut up. This is when Caucasians came on the scene and learned everything from Africans! So I know Anthro and Paleo all that good stuff with carbon dating etc, along with epigraphic evidence. So that's why I mentioned Egypt, Europe have no dedicated documentation prior Egypt and Herodotus said this. Who was a Greek Caucasian! So maybe you need to learn history and again Egypt is a misnomer the proper word is Kemet, or Tamerry or Sais, or Mizra'in! Before that was Kush!

So European civilizations was only basically A FEW THOUSAND YEARS AGO! and I am glad you said that because Africa is millions of years ago, they were smelting iron in Swaziland 50,000 years ago and where were the European Caucasians? NO WHERE ON THE SCENE THIS IS FACT IT'S NOT IF OR BUTS!

---

He's saying that African human beings have existed for "millions" of years? Based on radio-carbon tests? lol

On White Pride and Other Delusions:

Reflections on the Rage of the Uninformed

By Tim Wise


May 23, 2007

"The price the white American paid for his ticket was to become white...This incredibly limited, not to say dimwitted ambition has choked many a human being to death here: and this, I contend, is because the white American has never accepted the real reasons for his journey. I know very well that my ancestors had no desire to come to this place: but neither did the ancestors of the people who became white and who require of my captivity a song. They require of me a song less to celebrate my captivity than to justify their own."

James Baldwin, "The Price of the Ticket," 1985

It seems like every week I get an e-mail from someone demanding to know why there's no White History Month, or White Entertainment Television, or why whites aren't allowed to have organizations to defend "our" interests, the way people of color are, without being thought of as racists. One of these internet missives, which has been making the rounds lately on MySpace and other popular networking sites, implies that whites are somehow oppressed because we can't get away with calling people of color any number of racial slurs (a litany of which the author then proceeds to recite, almost gleefully), while persons of color presumably call us names like "cracker," "honky," or "hillbilly" all the time.

The e-mail goes on to express anger over, among other things, Martin Luther King Jr. day, and Yom HaShoah (Holocaust Remembrance day in Israel), as if these were holidays that discriminated against whites. It then laments that white pride is seen as racist, but for people of color to feel and show pride in their group is seen as normal, natural, and even healthy.

The Reverse Racism Ruse (Or How to Ignore Power, History and Logic)

That so many people find this kind of argumentation persuasive would be humorous were it not so dangerous, and so indicative of the way in which our nation has yet to come to grips with its racist history. Had we honestly confronted racism as an issue, past and present, it is unlikely that such positions would make sense to anyone. After all, every month has been white history month, even if they weren't called that. White history has been made the normative history, the default position, and when your narrative is taken as the norm--indeed, when it gets to be viewed as synonymous with American history--the need to racially designate its origins is obviously a less pressing concern. White folks' contributions have never been ignored, diminished or overlooked. As such, to now demand special time to teach about the people we've already learned about from the start seems a bit preposterous.

As for racial slurs, while it is certainly fair to point out that their use is always inappropriate, no matter whom they're directed against, to think that a term like hillbilly is truly equivalent to those used against people of color, like "nigger," "spic," "raghead," or "chink," requires one to exhibit a profound ignorance of history. These and other slurs against people of color not only sound more hateful, they have operated in a more hateful manner, by forming the linguistic cornerstone of systematic oppression and institutionalized racial supremacy. Hundreds of thousands were enslaved and millions have died at the hands of those who thought of their victims as "niggers," "spics," "ragheads" and "chinks," and used those terms as they went about their murderous ways. American history, in its historic treatment of persons of color has been an inter-generational hate crime, which didn't begin to end, even in theory, until the 1960s. On the other hand, anti-white terms are typically the end of the line when it comes to anti-white racism. People of color control no institutions that are capable of discriminating systematically against whites. They cannot keep whites from having jobs, or getting a loan. Nor can black cops get away with racially profiling whites, even when whites actually do lead the pack in one or another form of criminal behavior (serial killing, corporate fraud, or drunk driving, for example). So no, the terms are not the same, even as all are inappropriate and offensive.

And the idea that whites working for white empowerment or "white rights" is no different than people of color working for the empowerment of their group (through such mechanisms as the NAACP, or the Congressional Black Caucus, for instance), also makes sense, only if one takes a fundamentally dishonest glimpse at the nation's past.

After all, groups representing persons of color were created to address the unique disempowerment experienced by those groups' members. Blacks, Latinos, Asians and Native Americans have been systematically denied opportunities in the U.S. solely because of their group membership. Their "race" was the basis for housing discrimination, restrictions on educational opportunities, exclusion from jobs, and other forms of mistreatment. Whites have never been the targets of institutional oppression in the U.S., as whites, such that organizing as whites would have made sense. Sure, whites have been marginalized on the basis of ethnicity--the Irish, for example, or Italians, or Jews--and have long organized around ethnicity as a support system, for job networking, educational benefits, or other purposes. But as whites, persons of European descent have been the dominant group. So to organize on that basis, would be to come together for the purpose of providing collective support for one's existing domination and hegemony. It would be like corporate management forming a union to protect its interests from workers; or like the upper-caste in India, forming a Brahmin support group to protect itself from the Dalits, at the other end of the caste spectrum. Such a contingency would be redundant in the extreme.

To have a White Student Union, especially at a college where whites were in the clear majority, would be absurd, for this reason. To have a Congressional White Caucus, given the way in which white elites dominate the government would be even worse. To have a White Entertainment Television would ignore that whites already predominate on most all existing networks, and that shows pegged to people of color are few and far between, and usually limited to a handful of smaller networks and cable outlets.

Though many argue that affirmative action has made whites the victims of massive "reverse discrimination," and thus necessitated the rise of a white rights movement to secure white collective interests, the evidence simply doesn't support such a view. Although individual whites have likely experienced instances of discrimination--and anecdotal data suggests this is true, though far, far less often than the occasions when people of color experience it--there is nothing to indicate that such incidents are a widespread social phenomenon, against which whites now require organizations to protect them.

So, for instance, whites hold over ninety percent of all the management level jobs in this country (1), receive about ninety-four percent of government contract dollars (2), and hold ninety percent of tenured faculty positions on college campuses (3). Contrary to popular belief, and in spite of affirmative action programs, whites are more likely than members of any other racial group to be admitted to their college of first choice (4). Furthermore, white men with only a high school diploma are more likely to have a job than black and Latino men with college degrees (5), and even when they have a criminal record, white men are more likely than black men without one to receive a call back for a job interview, even when all their credentials are the same (6). Despite comparable rates of school rule infractions, white students are only half to one-third as likely as blacks and Latino youth to be suspended or expelled (7); and despite higher rates of drug use, white youth are far less likely to be arrested, prosecuted or incarcerated for a drug offense than are youth of color (8).

So when it comes to jobs, education, housing, contracting, or anything else, people of color are the ones facing discrimination and restricted opportunities, while whites remain on top, making the idea of organizing for our collective interests little more than piling dominance on top of dominance. Not to ensure a place at the table, so to speak, but to secure the table itself, and to control who gets to be seated around it, for now and always.

It is for this reason that white pride is more objectionable than "black pride," or "Latino pride." In the case of the latter two, those exhibiting pride are not doing so as a celebration of their presumed superiority, nor dominance over others. If anything, they are celebrating the perseverance of their people against great obstacles, such as those placed in their way by discrimination, conquest and enslavement. In the case of white pride, whites as whites have not overcome obstacles in the same fashion, because we have always been the dominant group. Although Irish pride or Italian pride makes sense given the way in which persons of those ethnicities have faced real oppression in the past (and even today, in the case of Italians, who sometimes face negative stereotypes), white pride, given the historic meaning of whiteness, can mean little but pride in presumed superiority.

White Bonding as a Dangerous Distraction

But especially ironic is that by seeking to bond on the basis of whiteness, those pushing the concept end up ignoring the way in which white identity has actually harmed persons of European descent, by causing most of us to ignore our real interests, all for the sake of phony racial bonding. To understand why this is so, it might help to have some historical perspective on how the notion of whiteness came into being in the first place, and for what purpose.

Contrary to popular belief, the white race is a quite modern creation, which only emerged as a term and concept to describe Europeans in the late 1600s and after, specifically in the colonies of what would become the United States. Prior to that time, "whites" had been a collection of Europeans with little in common, and often long histories of conflict, bloodshed and conquest of one another's lands and peoples. The English, for example, did not consider themselves to be of the same group as the Irish, Germans, Italians, or French. While most Europeans by that time may have thought of themselves as Christians, there is no evidence that they conceived of themselves as a race of people, with a common heritage or destiny.

But the notion of the white race found traction in the North American colonies, not because it described a clear scientific concept, or some true historical bond between persons of European descent, but rather, because the elites of the colonies (who were small in number but controlled the vast majority of colonial wealth) needed a way to secure their power. At the time, the wealthy landowners feared rebellions, in which poor European peasants might join with African slaves to overthrow aristocratic governance; after all, these poor Europeans were barely above the level of slaves themselves, especially if they worked as indentured servants (9).

In 1676, for example, Bacon's Rebellion prompted a new round of colonial laws to extend rights and privileges to despised poor Europeans, so as to divide them from those slaves with whom they had much in common, economically speaking. By allowing the lowest of Europeans to be placed legally above all Africans, and by encouraging (or even requiring) them to serve on slave patrols, the elite gave poor "whites" a stake in the system that had harmed them. Giving poor Europeans the right to own land, ending indentured servitude in the early 1700s, and in some cases allowing them to vote, were all measures implemented so as to convince lower-caste Europeans that their interests were closer to those of the rich than to those of blacks. It was within this context that the term "white" to describe Europeans en masse was born, as an umbrella term to capture the new pan-Euro unity needed to defend the system of African slavery and Indian genocide going on in the Americas (10). And the trick worked marvelously, dampening down the push for rebellion by poor whites on the basis of class interest, and encouraging them to cast their lot with the elite, if only in aspirational terms.

This divide-and-conquer tactic would be extended and refined in future generations as well. Indeed, the very first law passed by the newly established Congress of the United States was the Naturalization Act of 1790, which extended citizenship to all "free white persons," and only free white persons, including newly arrived immigrants, so long as the latter would make their homes in the U.S. for a year. Despite longstanding animosities between persons of European descent, all blood feuds were put aside for the purpose of extending pan-Euro or white hegemony over the United States (11).

During the Civil War, the process of using "whiteness" to further divide working people from one another continued. So, for example, Southern elites made it quite clear that their reason for secession from the Union was the desire to maintain and extend the institution of slavery and white supremacy, which institutions they felt were threatened by the rise of Lincoln and the Republican Party. One might think that seceding and going to war to defend slavery would hardly meet with the approval of poor white folks, who didn't own slaves. After all, if slaves can be made to work for free, any working class white person who must charge for their labor will be undercut by slave labor, and find it harder to make ends meet. Yet by convincing poor whites that their interests were racial, rather than economic, and that whites in the South had to band together to defend "their way of life," the elites in the South conned these same lower-caste Europeans into joining a destructive war effort that cost hundreds of thousands of lives (12): their lives, in fact.

Then during the growth of the labor union movement, white union workers barred blacks from apprenticeship programs and unions because of racism, encouraged in this by owners and bosses who would use workers of color to break white labor strikes for better wages and working conditions. By bringing in blacks and others of color to break strikes, bosses counted on white workers turning on those replacing them, rather than turning on the bosses themselves. And indeed, this is what happened time and again, further elevating whiteness above class interest in the minds of European Americans (13).

The effectiveness of racist propaganda to unite whites around race, even if it meant overlooking economic interests was stunning. Nowhere was this phenomena better summed up than in the words of one white Texas fireman, who responded to the suggestion that the ranks of railroaders should be opened up to blacks by saying, "We would rather be absolute slaves of capital than to take the Negro into our lodges as an equal and brother (14)."

White Bonding and the Continued Conning of the Working Class

Today, whiteness continues to serve as a distraction to working class persons of European descent. So in the debate over immigration, it is often claimed that immigrants of color are driving down the wages of white workers, and that sealing the border is necessary to secure jobs and decent incomes for the working class. But such an argument presumes that the only thing keeping employers from giving white workers a raise (or black workers for that matter) is the presence of easily exploited foreign labor. As if closing the border would suddenly convince them to open up their wallets and give working people a better deal. In truth, however, were companies unable to exploit immigrant labor, they would simply move their entire operations to Mexico, or elsewhere, to take advantage of low-wage labor or non-existent regulations on their activities. And if they were the kind of companies that couldn't move their operations abroad (such as construction firms, for example), they would likely shift to more contingent, part-time and temp labor, which would mean that whoever ended up with those jobs would still have little or no benefits, and insecure wages. This is hardly the recipe for real improvement in the conditions of working people.

White workers would be far better off joining up with workers of color, including the undocumented, to push for higher wages and better working conditions; and they would surely be better off if those coming from Mexico were made legal and organized into unions. But thinking as whites has made this kind of cross-racial solidarity virtually unthinkable. Instead of focusing on the trade agreements that allow companies to move wherever they can get the best return on investment--agreements which have, even by the government's admission resulted in the loss of hundreds of thousands of good-paying jobs--white workers are encouraged, by racism and white bonding to focus their ire on the workers themselves. After all, the workers are brown, while the owners are almost all white, which is to say that the latter are the ones with whom the white working class has been convinced to identify.

For an especially painful example of how destructive white racial thinking can be, consider St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana, next door to New Orleans. In the aftermath of Katrina, St. Bernard was among the hardest hit communities. Next to the ninety-four percent black Lower 9th Ward, in New Orleans, ninety-four percent white St. Bernard was probably the most devastated part of the region. Though racially different, the communities are both predominantly working class and populated by families with moderate income; and when the federal government, via the Corps of Engineers failed to ensure the proper construction of the levees, or when the local levee board diverted levee repair funds to build interstate off-ramps for the area's casinos, both the Lower 9 and St. Bernard saw their communities utterly destroyed.

But despite the common interests of the two community's residents, if you had asked most any white person in St. Bernard about the folks who lived in the Lower 9th, prior to the storm (or for that matter today), you would have been treated (or still would be) to an uninterrupted string of racist invective. To whites in "da parish" as it's known, blacks from New Orleans are the source of all the region's problems. This is why, in 1991, more than seven in ten whites from St. Bernard voted for neo-Nazi, David Duke when he ran for Governor of Louisiana. This is why the very first thing that Parish government did upon returning home after the storm, and starting to rebuild, was to pass a blood relative law for renters: in other words, you couldn't rent in St. Bernard unless you were a blood relative of the person who was to be your landlord. It was a clear attempt to block people of color from moving in, and once legal action was threatened the Parish backed down, as they could offer no non-racist reason for passing such a law.

And yet, what has the racialized thinking of whites in St. Bernard gotten them? It didn't keep them safe from busted levees. Indeed, had they been less racist and less given to thinking with their color, they might have noticed how much they had in common with their 9th Ward neighbors. But instead of joining hands with blacks in New Orleans, and marching alongside them in Washington DC or Baton Rouge, and demanding that their joint concerns be addressed, whites in places like Chalmette have been content to sit around talking about the "niggahs," and how lucky they were not to have to live side-by-side with them.

In a final irony, when students from historically black Howard University went to the New Orleans area to do relief work earlier this year, they were assigned to work in St. Bernard, rebuilding homes: homes that were it up to Parish leaders, they wouldn't have been able to live in. When one busload of students arrived at the site to which they had been sent that day, locals promptly called police. Because after all, a bunch of black people in the neighborhood must be a sign of trouble. So much for solidarity.

Conclusion: White Solidarity Illogical and Hurtful for All

It is perhaps understandable that young whites, uninformed about the history of racism in America, might fall prey to the lure of "white rights" thinking. After all, without a full understanding of the way in which whites have been elevated above people of color, and continue to be favored in employment, housing, criminal justice and education, it would make sense for whites to wonder why things like affirmative action or Black History Month were necessary; or why groups that advocate for the interests of persons of color were still needed. If you start from the assumption that the U.S. is a level playing field, then these kinds of things might seem odd, even racially preferential. But given the historical context, not to mention the vital information regarding ongoing discrimination in the present, the importance and legitimacy of these initiatives and organizations becomes evident to all but the most unreasonable.

What is most important for white folks to understand is that our interests do not lie with the racial bonding we are being asked to embrace. Indeed, the very concept of the white race was invented by the wealthy so as to trick poor and working class European Americans into accepting an economic system that exploited them, even as it elevated them in relative terms over persons of color. As such, for whites to organize on the basis of whiteness is to codify as legitimate a category the meaning of which was always and forever about domination and privilege relative to those who couldn't qualify for membership in the club.

Finally, to organize as whites in a white-dominated society, where whites have eleven times the average net worth of blacks and eight times the average net worth of Latinos (15), have unemployment rates half that of blacks, poverty rates one-third as high as that for blacks and Latinos (16), and where whites run virtually every major institution in the nation, is by definition to organize for the continuation of that domination and supremacy. It is to seek to enshrine one's head start; to seek the perpetuation of hegemony established in a system of formal apartheid, as if to say that that system was perfectly legitimate and worthy of survival. It is fundamentally different than for a minority group to organize collectively so as to secure their interests, since minority interests and opportunities cannot be assumed or taken for granted, as a function of their lesser power, while those of the majority typically can.

And to organize on the basis of whiteness is to cast one's lot with the elite, who desperately wish for working class people to believe their enemies are each other, rather than the bosses who cut their wages, raid their pension funds, and limit their health care coverage. The more that white working people fight working people who are black and brown, the less they'll be likely to take aim at those who pick their pockets every day they show up for work: paying them only a fraction of the value of the products and services they provide, all in the name of profits which they have no intention of truly sharing with their employees. Whiteness is a trick, but sadly one that has worked for nearly three-and-a-half centuries. Only when white folks wise up, and realize that whiteness itself is our problem, will we ever stand a chance of true liberation. Until then, our whiteness will provide us privileges and advantages, but only in relation to those at the bottom of the racial caste structure. It will provide a psychological wage, as W.E.B. Dubois put it, as an alternative to real wages. Not a bad deal, until you're struggling to feed your family and keep a roof over their heads. For in times like that, real currency works a bit better.


NOTES:

(1) U.S Federal Glass Ceiling Commission, Good for Business: Making Full Use of the Nation's Human Capital. (Washington DC: Bureau of National Affairs, March 1995).

(2) Fred L. Pincus, Reverse Discrimination: Dismantling the Myth. (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2003), 18.

(3) Roberta J. Hill, "Far More Than Frybread," in Race in the College Classroom: Pedagogy and Politics, ed. Bonnie TuSmith and Maureen T. Reddy. (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press), 169.

(4) Sylvia Hurtado and Christine Navia, "Reconciling College Access and the Affirmative Action Debate," in Affirmative Action's Testament of Hope, ed. Mildred Garcia (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1997), 115.

(5) The State of Black America 2007: Portrait of the Black Male. (NY: National Urban League 2007).

(6) Devah Pager, "The Mark of a Criminal Record," American Journal of Sociology 108, 5 (March 2003): 937-75.

(7) Russell J. Skiba, et al., The Color of Discipline: Sources of Racial and Gender Disproportionality in School Punishment (Indiana Education Policy Center, Policy Research Report SRS1, June 2000), 4.

(8) "Young White Offenders get lighter treatment," The Tennesseean. April 26, 2000: 8A; Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Results from the 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (Office of Applied Studies, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, 2004), also, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999. Summary of Findings from the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse; United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Crime in the United States, 2001. (2002); Coramae Richey Mann, Unequal Justice: A Question of Color. (Indiana University Press, 1993), 224; Jim Sidanius, Shana Levin and Felicia Pratto, "Hierarchial Group Relations, Institutional Terror and the Dynamics of the Criminal Justice System," in Confronting Racism: The Problem and the Response. eds. Jennifer Eberhardt and Susan T. Fiske, (London: Sage Publications, 1998), 142; SAMHSA, 2003 (see above): Table H.1. and calculations by the author. According to the SAMHSA report, as of 2003, there were 19.5 million current users of illegal narcotics. According to the data in the report, there were 165.4 million whites age 12 and over in the U.S., that year, and 8.5 percent of these were current users, which translates to 14 million white users. 14 million as a share of 19.5 million is 72 percent. According to the same report, there were 26.8 million blacks 12 and over in the U.S., of whom 9.7 percent were current drug users. This translates into 2.6 million current black drug users, which, as a share of 19.5 million is 13 percent. According to the report, there were 29 million Hispanics, of whom 7.2 percent, or 2 million, were current drug users. 2 million as a share of 19.5 million is 10 percent. Combined then, the black and Latino users come to 23 percent of all drug users; Human Rights Watch, Punishment and Prejudice: Racial Disparities in the War on Drugs. (Washington, D.C. Volume 12, No. 2, May 2000); Michael K. Brown, et al., Whitewashing Race: The Myth of a Color-Blind Society. (University of California, 2003), 144.

(9) Rubio, Paul. 2000. A History of Affirmative Action, 1619-2000. University Press of Mississippi; Loewen, James, 1995. Lies My Teacher Told Me, New Press; Gutman, Herbert and the American Social History Project. 1989. Who Built America? Working People and the Nation's Economy, Politics, Culture and Society. (Volumes 1 and 2) NY: Pantheon; Allen, Theodore. 1994. The Invention of the White Race, Volume One: Racial Oppression and Social Control. NY: Verso; Allen, Theodore, 1997. The Invention of the White Race, Volume Two: The Origin of Racial Oppression in Anglo-America. NY; Verso.

(10) Rubio, 2000; Thandeka, 2000. Learning to Be White: Money, Race and God in America. NY: Continuum.

(11) Rubio, 2000; Ignatiev, Noel, 1994. How the Irish Became White. NY: Routledge; Guglielmo, Jennifer (ed), 2003. Are Italians White? How Race is Made in America. NY: Routledge.

(12) Manning, Chandra, 2007. What This Cruel War Was Over: Soldiers, Slavery and the Civil War. NY: Knopf.

(13) Loewen, 1995; Gutman, et.al. 1989.

(14) Brown, Michael K, Martin Carnoy, Elliott Currie, Troy Duster, David B. Oppenheimer, Marjorie M. Schultz and David Wellman, 2003. Whitewashing Race: The Myth of a Color-Blind Society. University of California: 207.

(15) Shawna Orzechowski and Peter Sepielli, Net Worth and Asset Ownership of Households: 1998 and 2000 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, P70-88, May 2003), 2.

(16) The State of Black America 2007: Portrait of the Black Male. (NY: National Urban League 2007)


This is a clip from The Pathology of Privilege: Racism, White Denial & the Costs of Inequality, the newly released video from the Media Education Foundation. The video is of a speech given by Tim Wise at Mt. Holyoke College, October 1, 2007.


The Pathology of Privilege: Racism, White Denial & the Costs of Inequality
Tim Wise: On White Privilege (Clip) - YouTube


http://www.redroom.com/video/tim-wis...whiteness-clip


more complete video but has relatedlinks/urls and related to more of his speakings/lectures

Tim Wise-institutional racism, labor, prison education - YouTube


Talk - Tim Wise on White Privilege - YouTube


Tim Wise-institutional racism, labor, prison education
Tim Wise-institutional racism, labor, prison education - YouTube


affirmative action /school bias
white people have affimative action to
white people have affimative action to - YouTube

http://www.blackcommentator.com/64/6...on_flag_pf.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by loveboof

lol. No, telling you to 'use your brain' is not racist at all. The fact you're 'of African decent' is irrelevant to the fact that you're clearly either pretty stupid or just brain washed.

You're telling me that there were no people in Europe prior to the ancient Greek historian Heredotus? Did Greece just spring up the moment he stepped foot in it? Thats seems fairly implausible doesn't it?

But not quite as implausible as the notion that people were smelting iron 50,000 years ago. LOL!

Absolute nonsense. You're talking bullshit mate.

And why don't you visit Egypt and ask them what they want their country to be called. And for that matter, have you even been to Africa? It's weird that they're 'your' people but you choose to live in NYC...

---

Dude duh of course there were Caucasian people living in Europe before Greece, I asked you SHOW ME MONUMENTS AND MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, ETC before reaching Kemet! The Caucasians had none! YOu are dodging the question!

Me going to Africa and Kemet/Egypt was a great experience but still just a trip didn't educate me.

Now hold the fuck up, are you telling me because I have history of Africa I should move there? I tell you what, since the European Caucasians stole this land from the Natives why don't you move back to the Caucus mountains! Do that and I will move to Africa ok?

So are you telling me they were not smelting iron in Swaziland 50,000 years ago in Africa? Is that what you are saying? Either your ass don't know what you're talking about or you're just trying to be funny.

TIM WISE speak at mostly all the universities all over the USA


he has been given assignments by the US government and has succeed in his endeavors

Tim Wise essays

This is a clip from The Pathology of Privilege: Racism, White Denial & the Costs of Inequality, the newly released video from the Media Education Foundation. The video is of a speech given by Tim Wise at Mt. Holyoke College, October 1, 2007.


The Pathology of Privilege: Racism, White Denial & the Costs of Inequality
Tim Wise: On White Privilege (Clip) - YouTube


http://www.redroom.com/video/tim-wis...whiteness-clip


more complete video but has relatedlinks/urls and related to more of his speakings/lectures

Tim Wise-institutional racism, labor, prison education - YouTube


Talk - Tim Wise on White Privilege - YouTube


Tim Wise-institutional racism, labor, prison education
Tim Wise-institutional racism, labor, prison education - YouTube


affirmative action /school bias
white people have affimative action to
white people have affimative action to - YouTube


the most important items for you to here are Tim Wise on White Privilege (Teaser) m its only a few minutes and to help the school immediately at least the last 35 minutes of
Tim Wise on the "Dominant Historical Narrative"


http://www.redroom.com/media/tim-wise


Subject: Tim Wise Between Barack and a Hard Place: Racism and White Denial in the Age of Obama, is now available! According to The Wall Street Journal, Barack Obama's presidential victory means we "can put to rest the myth of racism as a barrier to achievement


New Book on Racism and White Denial in the Age of Obama is now available!!!



January 18, 2009

Between Barack and a Hard Place: Racism and White Denial in the Age of Obama, is now available! According to The Wall Street Journal, Barack Obama's presidential victory means we "can put to rest the myth of racism as a barrier to achievement in this splendid country."According to columnist Richard Cohen, Obama as President signifies that America is a "post-racial" nation, and




http://www.redroom.com/video/tim-wis...whiteness-clip

you must be from the confederate south

missipi or?


http://images.google.com/hosted/life...%3D20%26um%3D1

YOU FORGOT THE WHITE ONLY VOTE


http://www.freewayblogger.com/images...votes_only.jpg


http://www.tripodgirl.com/memories/u...nly-792580.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by q1a2z3

I enjoy being white! I especially enjoy the meetings with other whites. The special white-only coupons from large retailers help to. The discount on cars and the those white-only interest rates are great too!!!

Somebody had to be white - I'm happy it was me!

---

one of the most important VIDEOS FOR FREDDIE GOMEZ'S EDUCATION FROM A PROFESSOR OF A PRESTIGIOUS UNIVERSITY

Program: Black in Latin America
Episode: Mexico & Peru: A Hidden Race
Professor Gates explores the almost unknown history their significant black populations: the two countries together received far more slaves than did the United States.
• Visit the Mexico & Peru: A Hidden Race webpage

http://video.pbs.org/video/1915580662/
http://video.pbs.org/video/1915580662/
http://video.pbs.org/video/1915580662/
http://video.pbs.org/video/1915580662/

BIGGER ISSUES WHITE COLLAR CRIME IS THE REASON this country is IN THIS MESS IN THE FIRST PLACE.

WHITE COLLAR CRIME GOES UNPUNISHED MOSTLY AND NOT TAKEN SERIOUSLY



ITS DISCUSSED IN TIM WISE'S LECTURES

Tim Wise-institutional racism, labor, prison education - YouTube


TIM WISE- INSTITUTIONAL RACISM IN AMERICAN SOCIETY IS REAL - YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/results?searc...E_qJd2g&page=1

Brenda's penis??? That big. lol

http://www.nikki-dupre.com/wp-conten...aka-natina.jpg

Brenda, can you copy and paste a cat-scan of your brain, or did you fry it to a crisp with crack and meth? lol Oooooooooooh snap! lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nicole Dupre

He's saying that African human beings have existed for "millions" of years? Based on radio-carbon tests? lol

---

You fucking ass turd! you are the most silliest TGirl bitch I have ever seen on line!

I don't even know what the fuck you said which is stupid as fuck. My fucking shorts are BIKE not BVD's you dumb ass!
I didn't say shit about humans being tested for radio carbon to case them millions of years, I said I know and have the knowledge of it, but since your dumb ass went there, whats the oldest skull found, and where, and was it African or Caucasian? Lets see how smart your ass is!

You're the same dumb bitch that gets online in here to ask "WHO WANTS TO SHARE AND APARTMENT WITH ME" how fucking stupid can you be? Who would want to shack up with some air head egotistic ass lump who has nothing but drama in their life? Get the fuck outta here. You came straight in here trying to diss me and I didn't say shit to your dumb ass! Get the fuck on you dumb ass dog!