So, when Janet Napolitano is concerned about
Islamic radicals, she's on the right track, but when she's concerned about
right-wing radicals, you mouthbreathers go apeshit:
Statement by U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano on the Threat of Right-Wing Extremism
I'll repeat a couple of entirely reasonable challenges that you have thus far failed to address in any way whatsoever:
1. Say something, anything, about right-wing Christian terrorism. You've been offered many, many, many examples of Christian terror from which to choose. So just do it. It's not difficult. Just say, "Eric Rudolph is a misguided psycho," or "Scott Roeder should rot in jail." Anything, at all, to show that you're not completely indifferent to Alice Hawthorne or George Tiller or any of the other victims of Christian terror…
2. Find a single statement that I've made in support of radical Islam or Islamic terrorism. Just one. Even half-hearted support will suffice. You keep throwing out these accusations without any support beyond your inept and ungrammatical rhetoric.
In fact, what you’ll find is that I repeatedly and explicitly reject violence:
By way of contrast, you can’t even be arsed to murmur, “That’s a shame” or words to that effect, when informed of children being raped and murdered by the Christian Lord’s Resistance Army. When presented with an article about numerous black people being dragged to death by white people, your response is, Well, the victim should have made better choices.
So I ask you, who is it shrugging their shoulders?