Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BellaBellucci
a) shemaleyum.com AKA 'The premiere megasite for men in dresses, and a few TS's.'
b) essentially you've argued that you can't see a chromosome, which is an argument utilized by many transwomen (myself included) to lessen the perception that they are are not women. Transvestites can't utilize this argument since they're literally men in dresses. Chromosomes are the least of their problems. yet you put them on Shemaleyum with transitioned women and imply that they're the same. Just because you haven't come right out and said it, that doesn't mean we can't draw a legitimate conclusion from your actions. :?
~BB~
a) I've just counted on SMY's last 100 updated models. Only one MAY be a crossdresser/part-timer, I'm not sure - so I'd say yes, we still are the internet's premiere transssexual site.
b) No, Bella - you drew conclusions. I clearly just put that up to show one of the few differences in people and that not everyone falls into MEN or WOMEN. It had nothing to do with TV vs TS - I even stated below, it was just one "little example".
Your nasty piece of work aren't you? I know you revel in it but it's very disturbing how nasty you really are. I wouldn't put anything past that twisted little mind of yours.
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
sceanchai no need to defend giving your customers what they want to see.
a guy jerking off to a shemaleyum vid could give a fuck if the model is TV, CD, TS, or whatever.
wasn't Jamie Markham hugely popular before she decided to go do gay porn ?
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
seanchai
a) I've just counted on SMY's last 100 updated models. Only one MAY be a crossdresser/part-timer, I'm not sure - so I'd say yes, we still are the internet's premiere transssexual site.
I didn't say the TV's were popular, I just that they're there and marketed on a site that you still, even in this sentence, swear is the premier transsexual site. Since it also features TV's, which part of my statement is incorrect? Oh right... none of it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
seanchai
b) No, Bella - you drew conclusions. I clearly just put that up to show one of the few differences in people and that not everyone falls into MEN or WOMEN. It had nothing to do with TV vs TS - I even stated below, it was just one "little example".
I understand that, but I'd also argue that it shadows your actions in this matter. They speak louder than your words.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
seanchai
Your nasty piece of work aren't you? I know you revel in it but it's very disturbing how nasty you really are. I wouldn't put anything past that twisted little mind of yours.
I don't revel in any of this. The nasty piece of work is you, making personal arguments out of the tiniest criticisms, until, lo and behold, the criticisms grow stronger and louder because now you've gone and pissed people off who have business, investigative, and political skills that you can't match who, due to your own ignorant, shortsighted actions, you've radicalized against you.
As I've said on numerous occasions, there are plenty of people who agree with what I've said about you and your company and you're just mad that you can't destroy my integrity as the perceived leader of said people.
Politics 101. :geek:
~BB~
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BellaBellucci
it's odd that a man who shoots amateur TV's and markets them right along TS's as if they're the same thing is now here touting the differences between the two.
~BB~
Not trying to speak on behalf of Steven, but Marketing TVs and TSs is a no brainer... Members of TGirl porn sites obviously want to see both because they know Some TV's and some TSs are passable or attractive to them.
I don't think he Markets them together because he actually believes they are the SAME thing.
You're just picking an argument every time the guy posts something..
We get it Bella, you don't like him.
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
flabbybody
sceanchai no need to defend giving your customers what they want to see.
a guy jerking off to a shemaleyum vid could give a fuck if the model is TV, CD, TS, or whatever.
wasn't Jamie Markham hugely popular before she decided to go do gay porn ?
so right about this Flabby lol
the consumer don't differentiate - unless they say oh that one has tits so it must be a tranny
Need I remind you a ts is based on what's going on in the inside not just the outside..how do you know the girl isn't a TS - oh right cause she hasn't been on hormones as long as you or had surgery still working on her shadow
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
flabbybody
sceanchai no need to defend giving your customers what they want to see.
a guy jerking off to a shemaleyum vid could give a fuck if the model is TV, CD, TS, or whatever.
wasn't Jamie Markham hugely popular before she decided to go do gay porn ?
If I didn't know better I'd say you just proved my point for me. :lol:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KellyShore
Need I remind you a ts is based on what's going on in the inside not just the outside..how do you know the girl isn't a TS - oh right cause she hasn't been on hormones as long as you or had surgery still working on her shadow
Even still. That doesn't mean a transitioning girl is ready to model. Jamie was a perfect example. As popular as 'she' was, it was clear that 'she' wasn't a TS, and yet 'she' was getting all this attention because of 'her' proximity to Brittany. Nepotism, much?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kayden Harley
You're just picking an argument every time the guy posts something..
We get it Bella, you don't like him.
That's unfair. I let him do his thing until he starts talking about trans-politics. I don't care how many model yes-girls that just want to stay on the money man's good side defend him, I only attack when I think he's saying or doing something that I find politically unfair or disadvantageous to transwomen, particularly when he stands to benefit. For the most part, I've been leaving his posts alone.
~BB~
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BellaBellucci
I didn't say the TV's were popular, I just that they're there and marketed on a site that you still, even in this sentence, swear is the premier transsexual site. Since it also features TV's, which part of my statement is incorrect? Oh right... none of it.
I understand that, but I'd also argue that it shadows your actions in this matter. They speak louder than your words.
I don't revel in any of this. The nasty piece of work is you, making personal arguments out of the tiniest criticisms, until, lo and behold, the criticisms grow stronger and louder because now you've gone and pissed people off who have business, investigative, and political skills that you can't match who, due to your own ignorant, shortsighted actions, you've radicalized against you.
As I've said on numerous occasions, there are plenty of people who agree with what I've said about you and your company and you're just mad that you can't destroy my integrity as the perceived leader of said people.
Politics 101. :geek:
~BB~
Let me guess how your beef with Seanchai started. Seanchai must be some photographer or producer for a porn company, u tried to get some pics, work, photo shoots or something done with him, but he must of have passed u by, now u mad at him??? Am I'm close?
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BellaBellucci
Even still. That doesn't mean a transitioning girl is ready to model. Jamie was a perfect example. As popular as 'she' was, it was clear that 'she' wasn't a TS, and yet 'she' was getting all this attention because of 'her' proximity to Brittany. Nepotism, much?
Who are you to make that decision? Who are you to say she wasn't ready? She was popular, guys enjoyed her, she was one of the best sellers on Shemale Strokers? Unlike you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BellaBellucci
That's unfair. I let him do his thing until he starts talking about trans-politics. I don't care how many model yes-girls that just want to stay on the money man's good side defend him, I only attack when I think he's saying or doing something that I find politically unfair or disadvantageous to transwomen, particularly when he stands to benefit. For the most part, I've been leaving his posts alone.
Absolutely pathetic. You attack me constantly on a business and a personal level. You've went out of your way with poor attempts to hurt my business and the people working in it. You were a yes-girl ... we were the ones who said, hmm thanks but NO!!!
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BellaBellucci
............ because now you've gone and pissed people off who have business, investigative, and political skills that you can't match who, due to your own ignorant, shortsighted actions, you've radicalized against you.
Politics 101. :geek:
Hahahaha.
Delusions 101.
Have they already radicalized or did they go for a beer instead and leave you at home - or is it something I have to look forward to?
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SirCumsAlot
Let me guess how your beef with Seanchai started. Seanchai must be some photographer or producer for a porn company, u tried to get some pics, work, photo shoots or something done with him, but he must of have passed u by, now u mad at him??? Am I'm close?
That would be their convenient excuse, but actually they invited me to shoot, promised to help me get into the business, dropped the ball on it, played with my shoot release date because I wanted to self-promote, used the WORST photos in the sets (that never should be been released, let alone showcased) to market me (effectively slowing my career), patronized me until they couldn't anymore at which time Steven decided to publicly argue with me about it instead of talking to me one-on-one. This is to say nothing of the Mean Girls' 'Plastics' attitude that is encouraged among their people. They truly think their shit doesn't stink.
From there I decided I would scrutinize Grooby's business plan more closely, and lo and behold, I found everything I needed to establish that it runs like the 'Wal-Mart of Tranny Pr0n,' step on the little guy, promote the undeserving, and blur the lines between TS/TV/CD so that a a 24/7 man in lipstick and a dress is somehow the same as an individual who has taken the time and had the commitment to assert and confirm their identity as female.
I could go on, but it might take all day. I won't lie: things are looking up and I think there have been efforts made lately to level the playing field, and in private conversations on this topic, I've given him credit for that. The question is whether or not he has an ulterior motive and if it will be enough to undo the damage that he's caused to the image of transsexuals over the years.
Mark my words though, if Steven actually puts in more effort to help transwomen become more independent and accepted in society, I will be the first to congratulate him. As far as I'm concerned, the personal stuff has been water under the bridge for quite some time. This is purely business/political now.
~BB~
