Are we watching people spread the HIV virus...

Internet hardasses are LOL-tastic.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by phobun

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by addicted

Just how would these people know they are hiv positive? By taking a bogus inaccurate hiv test that proves nothing. They ahould tested for std's if they are barebacking fecal matter. Not very healthy to stick your dick in someones shithole bare. There is just massive bacteria in the anus and a bare dick and a bare tongue does not belong in there.

---

The stupidest tool on HA forum is back! Is it possible your dementia is HIV related?

---

are you angry because you took a hiv test and tested positive but now you realize you got played.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by magicone

on some of these low production, amateur tgirl sites? I check out lots of the black girls sites, and i see some hardcore bareback anal sex going on with lots of different guys whom I'm almost certain aren't being screened.

Look at sites like bigdickbitch.com, juicynikki.com, and some of the other southern based black girls sites and you'll see what im getting at>

Its really irresponsible and dangerous. I like big girls so I joined nikkis site, but I canceled the same day, because its just poor personal conduct to spread diseases for entertainment.

---

WOW. You know how to talk out of your ass.

So you are almost, almost? certain, almost? but your not certain, right? Then you go on an point out a few sites that you are almost certain about, but your not certain, but you'll name them anyway and accuse them of spreading diseases.

It is really irresponsible to be spreading rumors that these sites are using people with diseases. I would guess a legal term would be slander on your part. And if these sites got upset enough they could sue you for it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by freak

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by magicone

on some of these low production, amateur tgirl sites? I check out lots of the black girls sites, and i see some hardcore bareback anal sex going on with lots of different guys whom I'm almost certain aren't being screened.

Look at sites like bigdickbitch.com, juicynikki.com, and some of the other southern based black girls sites and you'll see what im getting at>

Its really irresponsible and dangerous. I like big girls so I joined nikkis site, but I canceled the same day, because its just poor personal conduct to spread diseases for entertainment.

---

WOW. You know how to talk out of your ass.

So you are almost, almost? certain, almost? but your not certain, right? Then you go on an point out a few sites that you are almost certain about, but your not certain, but you'll name them anyway and accuse them of spreading diseases.

It is really irresponsible to be spreading rumors that these sites are using people with diseases. I would guess a legal term would be slander on your part. And if these sites got upset enough they could sue you for it.

---

I told them the same exact thing and they think its funny. Until they get a letter in the mail.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by keepingitreal470

I told them the same exact thing and they think its funny. Until they get a letter in the mail.

---

No, son, you're funny. AIDS is not funny. Barebacking is dangerous. Even with screening. I am writing in very short sentences. This is so that you can understand.

I'm sorry your dick is bigger than your brain, I really am.

@ at the prick with the attitude again

....And if you really think anything Magicone or I said was actionable, then you are even more stupid than you at first appear. And man, that is really, really, REALLY, REALLY stupid.

Maybe you should finish school before you start trying to think grown-up.

Barebacking is dangerous and a known vector for the transmission of HIV/AIDS. Sue me, cuntbrain.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by freak

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by magicone

on some of these low production, amateur tgirl sites? I check out lots of the black girls sites, and i see some hardcore bareback anal sex going on with lots of different guys whom I'm almost certain aren't being screened.

Look at sites like bigdickbitch.com, juicynikki.com, and some of the other southern based black girls sites and you'll see what im getting at>

Its really irresponsible and dangerous. I like big girls so I joined nikkis site, but I canceled the same day, because its just poor personal conduct to spread diseases for entertainment.

---

WOW. You know how to talk out of your ass.#

---

Actually, no, it's his opinion and he has a right to it. I have not seen the sites he mentioned and I have no intention of looking, but in general terms, barebacking is a dangerous, known vector for the transmission of STDs including HIV/AIDS.

Quote:

---

So you are almost, almost? certain, almost? but your not certain, right? Then you go on an point out a few sites that you are almost certain about, but your not certain, but you'll name them anyway and accuse them of spreading diseases.

It is really irresponsible to be spreading rumors that these sites are using people with diseases. I would guess a legal term would be slander on your part.

---

No, actually, it wouldn't. One reason is because M1 said "I'm almost certain," as you noted, without, obviously, understanding what it actually meant. In other words it's his OPINION, as someone who is not in a position to know for sure. And an opinion properly stated cannot be defamatory, either as slander or libel. Had he said "It is a known fact" and it wasn't, then, that might possibly have been actionable. Furthermore, his right to his opinion is a Constitutional one in the US--I'd really like to see you, or some porn-site owner, fuck with that.

Quote:

---

And if these sites got upset enough they could sue you for it.

---

No, they couldn't, as I have just explained.

Oh yes, and frankly, if barebacking sites get closed, so much the better.

And a final thought before coffee--one of the joys of the internet is that people are free to have and share their opinions without having to take seriously threats from moronic thugs who see intimidation, either by physical attack or "legal action" as a legitimate method of getting their own way.

Now fuck off back to school the pair of you.

A few questions for KIR470:

How old are you man? You always seem to want to resolve silly HA disputes with your fists. OK, so let's say someone decided to take you up on it, how do you know the other party will not show up with a knife, or worse, a gun? And if they show up with no weapons, you are willing to risk being injured and/or arrested over some silly shit someone wrote on HA? How smart is that? Are you willing to risk your health and acting career over some stupid shit like this? smh.

Sometimes it takes a real man, or should I say, an adult, to know when to walk away from a fight, especially an internet fight. Have a nice day.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by keepingitreal470

She has the legal team on her side and can do whatever she sees fit. Me on the other hand, I handle things my own way. Man to man, face to face bitch ass motherfuckers. See, I dont argue back and forth online like some bitch. .....I just wish one of you yellow bellied motherfuckers would agree to talk this out face to face. Fucking clowns behind a keyboard. I dont know where suckalot is, but Fred, your in Queens, what the fuck is up bitch. Aint nothin but a train ride for me. You got somethin else you wanna say?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by keepingitreal470

I'd prefer you man the fuck up and agree to settle our differences in person. But being the punk bitch that you are, I should have known this wasnt possible. Punk faggott ass motherfuckers put their mouth where it dont belong, then when someone real like myself calls them out, they hide behind the fucking keyboard.

---

[/quote]

"Furthermore, his right to his opinion is a Constitutional one in the US"

Not to nitpick, but this is not true. Nowhere in the Bill of Rights is it written that someone has the right to their opinion.

The closest you may come to that conclusion is in the First Amendment which states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The implication is that you are free to speak, which presumably includes your opinion. However, the courts have ruled that this is not absolute. For example, you may not yell "Fire!" in a crowded theatre without consequence.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by keepingitreal470

HOLD THE FUCK UP!!!! Magicone, Mac, and whoever the fuck u motherfuckers call yourselves. Madison is a very close friend of mine. What gives you the right to come here and try to slander her? Who the fuck do you think you are? I've seen every last one of her vids and she uses condoms in all of them. I also happen to know that she does have her own screening and testing process, and most of the men in her vids are used over and over. She has a small group of men that appear in her vids and she knows them well. Low quality? Please. A certain member here posts links to all of her youtube vids that are lower in quality than Madison's vids. Point here is, if something offends you that much, DONT WATCH IT JACKASS! And dont give you comments on shit you know nothing about. She has a legal team that could sue your fucking ass for what you posted here. Think before you type fucking cocksucker!!!!!

---

That right there is a lie I have a BB video of her in it.

IDK y people get all riled up over shit like this. These morals and all this shit needs to really GTFO. It's is people choice to go in her and shoot these films. Now as long as deception isn't being used why should anybody care who shoots BB and who doesn't. Ya'll sound like sum of these bullshit politicians running around tryin to run other people lives.