I know him. I’ve met him. I’ve also met some of the girls that have replied.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shelf
Just answering your question. I have no knowledge of the accusations.
Printable View
I know him. I’ve met him. I’ve also met some of the girls that have replied.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shelf
Just answering your question. I have no knowledge of the accusations.
Good thing you don't work in porn because you're delusional if you think that shit is professional conduct in pornography.Quote:
Originally Posted by giovanni_hotel
Professional conduct in porn is not having sex off screen, but having respectful attitude toward your co-actors / actresses. There are no "tryouts" or whatever it is you conjured up in your head, at least not with producers who know how to conduct themselves.
Not to mention that having sex in front of a camera is COMPLETELY different to having sex off-screen.
If you have no clue about working in the industry, don't pretend you do and preach your uneducated opinion as truth.
Don't worry. He is just one of the hungangels' communists, who don't have a clue what they are talking about:) Still no sign of the First Secretary though...
I do not know anything about the Porn Industry, nor do I know Christian or anybody involved, but I did receive Sexual Harassment training in the wake of all the allegations now out in the public over the last few months.
HR of course explained in detail what is appropriate in the work place and what is not, but then they explained how harassment can be unintentional and still be absolutely wrong. They made reference to Louis CK who did not purposely try to sexually harris woman but realized after the fact that being in a position of power and even asking was still applying undue pressure because he was famous and held some amount of power of the woman he asked to show his genitals too.
They explained that any one employee may not purposely set out to commit sexual harassment but may end of doing so by simply being in a position of power even if it seems the other party is willing to do so, they maybe acting out of fear rather than actual desire.
Of course I do not know Christian as I said earlier, nor do I know anything about the Porn Industry nor any of its actors or actresses but obviously Sexual Harassment is a problem in every industry and by no means am I excusing anybody, but it seems to me that we as a population are going to have to take a good hard look at how we all behave and treat others.
Is it possible that Christian thought it was okay because there we no complaints? Absoultely, he may not have gone in thinking he was committing sexual harassment, that does not make it any less wrong, but it is easy to see how it could happen. Again, I have absolutely no idea, just speculating as that is what one tends to do on the internet, play arm chair quarterback.
After the HR training, I started to think how I interact with colleagues and I have made adjustments to ensure that I do not cause any undue harm, even though I never had an intention to do so and never would.
no please no
you guys really need to meet Duke Skywalker shooting for facialabuse.com
No I don't, which is why I've refrained from passing (ill-informed) comment ...Quote:
Originally Posted by IHeartLadyCock
Lol :dead::whistle:Quote:
Originally Posted by giovanni_hotel
So, it is like the music industry.
As Red Vex likes to say .. Oh Dear, oh, Dear :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkrose2000
And usually the music producer asks for you to sing, not grab you by the ass and force it out of you.
I don't have to work in adult entertainment to know the sum total of these complaints sound like bullshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by NikaTS
What I do know is that in all genres of porn, it's COMMON for producers to sleep with talent, and for more established actors to have sex off camera with newbies just entering the industry.
Did Christian not shoot with a woman if she refused to sleep with him off camera?? I don't know for a fact, but I'd say it's highly unlikely.
These girls aren't the Sister of the Poor. If they didn't want to have sex with Christian off camera, why didn't they say no??
Did they really think Christian tracked these girls down, arranged a fee, and then would decide not to work with them if they didn't have sex with him off camera??
From where I'm sitting, these girls had sex with Christian off camera because they WANTED to, and now after the fact are trying to call it sexual harassment.
NO one is saying these girls have to like Christian, but accusing someone of sexual harassment, sexual assault, or even rape isn't something you do because you don't like someone.
There are a lot of grey lines in porn and all these women would be hard pressed to convince anyone what Christian did was illegal.
Also, conflicted sex isn't sexual assault.
It's not like Christian was paying these girls tens of thousands of dollars either. Their 'careers' weren't on the line if they said no to Christian offscreen.
I don't see how Christian actually pressured these girls into having sex with him.
To me it still sounds like a bunch of bitter babes had a hen conference and decided to go after an easy target.
You think the only time a girl should speak up is when she is being raped. Bruh...Quote:
Originally Posted by giovanni_hotel