Printable View
Not sure if it is wise for Harris to trade insults with Trump. I would prefer her to ignore the ‘crappy’ rhetoric of a bitter, violent man, and focus on the positives and the future- a positive view of the US over the next 10 years, with rights and responsibility at the core, the sort of things Trump cannot deal with because he is only interested in revenge for attacks on him in the past, stealing as much money from the taxpayer as he can, and giving policy decisions to Christian Nationalists.
Completely agree with your post.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stavros
Not sure if any comment is needed. The man is an embarrassment to everyone. Next to him, Kamala Harris looks and sounds like divine intervention.
Trump Campaign Attempts Damage Control Over Fiasco At Black Journalists' Conference (yahoo.com)
Completely agree Donald Trump sure an embarrassment to everyone. And also agree that Vice President Kamala Harris does looks and sounds like divine intervention.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stavros
Has Trump peaked? It looks like the momentum is with Harris, notably among women. Maybe turnout will be a strong factor, not to mention Trump zealots in States where they can delay or try to change the vote. And so far the Harris campaign has not screwed p.
Interesting...
John King breaks down how the race has changed since Biden’s exit (yahoo.com)
How to steal an election from the people who vote, courtesy of Stalin ('Its not the votes that count, but who counts the votes'), and Donald J Trump, aided by Cleta Mitchell, another lawyer from nowhere who was recruited by the White House and who, in that illegal phone call to Georgia showed she was ignorant of election law in that State, but has since, one assumes, educated herself.
Interesting, but chilling too
‘A different level than 2020’: Trump’s plan to steal election is taking shape | US elections 2024 | The Guardian
Not a fan of either party. But I'd vote for the worst possible outcome. And that means: Kamala Harris. To me it's easy. Take 5 minutes and vote against -- against!!! -- the worst possible outcome. And, again, to me that means a Harris presidency.Quote:
Originally Posted by KnightHawk 2.0
From a left perspective one votes against the worst possible outcome and then gets on w/ real politics. Which is activism, organizing, educating... to bring about a better world.
As I previously pointed out: Not a fan of either party. But I'd vote against Trump to elect Kamala Harris. Plus it'd be a big step forward: finally a female president...
The Cult of Kamala - The American Conservative
Oh, I made a mistake in my previous post - ha ha! I wrote: "But I'd vote for the worst possible outcome. And that means: Kamala Harris." What I meant was I'd vote AGAINST the worst possible outcome. That means: K. Harris.
Harris all the way the week she was nominated I made a $500 donation
Is Trump making a big mistake by using AI, be it Harris or Taylor Swift? I don't know much about Swift but I looked up her legal options and they are fairly clear, as her image was used without her consent. Or would she have a bigger impact by appearing on stage in Chicago to endorse Harris? But I believe she is doing concerts in London. The link is below. As for Harris being a Communist, well that just means that making stupidity normal remains Trump's only mode of campaigning. Do people actually believe this sort of thing?
"According to Jessica Silbey, a professor at Boston University School of Law and an expert in intellectual property and constitutional law, Trump’s fake endorsement post likely violates Swift’s right of publicity — the legal power to control how your name, image and likeness are used by others.
“Everyone enjoys a right of publicity,” says Silbey, who has written extensively about the internet. “This kind of use — being made to say and seen as believing things you don’t — is at the core of the right.”".
Can Taylor Swift Sue Donald Trump Over AI-Generated False Endorsement? (billboard.com)