I'm talking about her conservative views in general
Printable View
I'm talking about her conservative views in general
Blair White hosted Alex Jones a year or so ago, even after he sent his followers to harass the Sandy Hook parents.
Blair is an absolute a piece of shit, like Alex Jones. I hope horrific things happen to her, and anyone else who likes Alex Jones.
Almost all of her Texan TS friends (who are also conservative, like Kendall Penny or Alayna June) are escorts, do porn, do OnlyFans, etc.
Very infuriating to hear her talk shit about trans women being too slutty or too sexualized, and supporting conservative causes, the hypocrisy is through the roof.
I guess they share a fondness for conspiracy theoriesQuote:
Originally Posted by dc_guy_75
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Being called a conspiracy theorist just isn’t the insult it used to be, because you’re likely going to be vindicated within 6 months.</p>— BLAIRE WHITE (@MsBlaireWhite) <a href="https://twitter.com/MsBlaireWhite/status/1522959258375303169?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 7, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Damn, it's disappointing that Kendall Penny is on that bullshit. I was super disappointed when other girls like Danni Daniels and Kendra Moore revealed themselves as MAGA types, too. I notice a pattern, but I'm not sure if we can have that conversation here.Quote:
Originally Posted by cali8989
I don't find it surprising at all when you factor that there are already Republican/Conservative Gays and Lesbians out there.Quote:
Originally Posted by phillyguy21
Blair is a piece of shit, she’s hot but she’s fucking trash
She certainly knows how to appeal to the fetishes of her right-wing fans
Attachment 1425194Attachment 1425195
With a totally expressionless face.Quote:
Originally Posted by filghy2
It's definitely not surprising. It's disappointing in the sense that I've jerked off to them.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFanti
I think it is appalling that some people think a stranger should have political beliefs based on their sexuality or race.
I think it is refreshing that someone can take a look at a broad range of issues and decide what is most important to them when they decide to support a political candidate or party (not blindly following the herd).
For example if I lived in San Francisco quality of life issues like crime, dirty streets, poor schools, etc. would be at the top of my list whether I was straight, gay or trans.
Hooray for independent thinkers not blindly following the herd!Quote:
Originally Posted by mildcigar_2001
https://wlos.com/resources/media2/16...frame_1820.jpg
Says the man whose every post reads like it was taken from Fox News. Please tell us where exactly your heroine has shown evidence of independence of mind and careful consideration of the issues. Her Twitter page is pretty much a bunch of glib one-liners and straight-out lib-trolling.Quote:
Originally Posted by mildcigar_2001
You realise there's no necessary connection between whether someone arouses you sexually and whether they are a wonderful human being in other ways? Those are two separate categories, I'm afraid.Quote:
Originally Posted by phillyguy21
‘Wokeism’, ‘Neo-Marxism’….here is the irony: the original intention of Neo-Marxism was to critique the role played by culture in the suppression of revolutionary class consciousness, it sought to liberate the oppressed by exposing the extent to which they have been duped into enjoying- and paying for- the same consumerist system that oppresses them. Disney became the model which promoted a happy life concept through the nuclear family plus house and dog and cat.
Look at Jordan Peterson and others of his intellectual calibre, or the crude versions that are obsessed with Critical Race Theory, Feminism, Drag, LGBTQ+ ‘rights’, and you have the same methodology seeking to liberate the masses from Neo-Marxism and replace it with Christian Nationalism. Now even Disney is a ‘woke’ enemy, just as De Santis and Trump regularly attack corporate capitalism, as if they had not been beneficiaries of their success- but not for their capitalism, but their Human Resources policies on equality and diversity in the workplace- not something found in the Trump Organization.
Blaire White is thus, one regrets to say, for such people a useful idiot. The culture zealots around Trump and De Santis if they gain power again, or in the case of De Santis, already exert real power, want to cancel Blaire White, and return her and all other Trans Americans to the shadows in which they once lived; obscure, limited, above all, silenced.
Or more accurate to say Trump and De Santis want to liberate American from Liberalism, as well as its claim that academia and the media have been captured by the ‘left’, ‘ultra left’ and so on.
According to her Twitter she now lives in Texas.Quote:
Originally Posted by mildcigar_2001
Just for your benefit, I googled the latest stats on murder rates by state:
California 6.4 per 100,000
Texas 8.2 per 100,000
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/s...y/homicide.htm
In fact, it looks like Republican states generally have higher murder rates. I guess they don't tell you that on Fox News, huh?
Unfortunately statistics (unless you know more about the situation) can be misleading.The higher crime rates within some "red states" are being pushed there by blue cities within those states (that are generally soft on crime and have a large numbers of a "certain minority" in those blue cities) within those states. Guess why the states on that list are in the generally within the southern part of the U.S. (where coincidentally there is a high concentration of that certain minority group within the high crime blue cities).For example the blue city of St. Louis majorly skews the crime statistics of the state of Missouri. The State of Missouri recently had to recently remove the local prosecutor in St. Louis because she didn't do her job (a dangerous combination of ideology and incompetence). I'm talking about Missouri because I am most familiar with it , but the blue cities (generally are run by said minority group) and were very eager to "defund the police" a couple of years ago with predictable results. For those that are not familiar with crime in the U.S., over half of the murders committed in the U.S. are done by that certain minority group talked about above. 12% of the population is commiting a little over half the murders in the U.S., and the statistics are similar for other violent crimes. However because this information is racially inflammatory we dare not speak about it. Since murders are generally committed by men this means that approximately 6% of the population (the males of this certain minority group) are committing around half the murders in the country. Please don't talk to me about the "dangerous" red states. We know why some of the red states' blue cities are very dangerous.
Interesting stats here:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/...e-us-by-state/
I guess California is considered blue currently, but it has very large red areas.
A very polite way for you to refuse to listen to any information you don't like.Quote:
Originally Posted by mildcigar_2001
Thank you, Mr One Track Mind. Funny how starting with a fixed answer always takes you back to the same point.Quote:
Originally Posted by mildcigar_2001
For once, you actually made a verifiable claim, although the correct percentage of black offenders seems to be 45%. It's also true that about 40% of murder victims in the US are black.
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s...ta-table-6.xls
I'm not suggesting that black-on-black murders are not a problem, but it's still true that a white person is nearly 5 times more likely to be murdered by another white person than by black person. I think my point that Blaire hasn't necessarily made herself safer by moving from California to Texas also still holds.
As always, you ignore the elephant in the room. The question you haven't addressed is why most of the cities with the highest murder rates seem to be in red states.
https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/mur...u-s-cities/27/
If it was due to cities being Democrat-controlled wouldn't you expect a more even distribution? I don't suppose it could have anything to do with laxer gun laws in red states, could it? The correlation betweens murder rates and numbers of guns is obvious to those who are not wilfully blind.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...s_and_homicide
To which one adds: 90% of convicted paedophiles in the US are white men, who also commit most white collar crime. The FBI has collated the Stats:
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s...ables/table-43
I think it's also true that most paedophiles are respectable-looking community members, who are generally known to the victims' families. The idea that paedophiles are likely to be recognisable 'deviant' types (eg drag performers) is a common delusion that our protagonist if happy to endorse.
Here's a full detail on Blaire White and conservatives view on LGBT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-t9Z_XBoZU
That video is very telling and confirms what many of us have been saying about Blaire. The blonde nutter launches an unhinged transphobic diatribe, telling Blaire to go back to being a man. Rather than pushing back, Blaire's response is to try to ingratiate herself with the transphobe.
Your stats don't reflect that the cities with the highest crime, may be in red states, but are all blue controlled cities. Be honest.
I love her
His post is 100% correct. Blue controlled cities are the source of the vast majority of crime.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzcarraldo
What are the causes of crime? Poverty? Madness? Do criminals think they will get away with it if they live in New York but not Tallahassee?Quote:
Originally Posted by completely_nailed
You might want to define crime before making generalised statements- for it is possible to break the law and not be prosecuted- Donald Trump managed it for years before his decades of deceit and fraud in New York City caught up with him.
One law for the lawyered up rich, another for the poor? Surely not in America!
Climate change denialist says other people need to be honest. Love it.Quote:
Originally Posted by completely_nailed
http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/sho...88#post2073488
Are you sure about Danni Daniels - or did everyone just misinterpret her sign?Quote:
Originally Posted by phillyguy21
http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/sho...g-Agains-Trump
Attachment 1425692
I would marry her!
Blaire is needed.
Not all trans people agree with the woke agenda.
She represents the silent majority.
And let's be honest, Blaire is in part where she is because she's hot. If she weren't a passable and pretty trans lady, she wouldn't have the platform she does. She sticks in people's minds more, and probably deep down she knows her looks as much as her message is why she blew up on social media.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8IM...AT1sOj-mIR94r-
Majority??? What is your source for that determination? (And who is silent about opposition to transpeople?)Quote:
Originally Posted by holzz
I call it a hunch and not anything solidly proven. THough it's not a stretch to assure that there are trans people who do not agree with what the wokeists say or call for.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzcarraldo
That's far from a majority.Quote:
Originally Posted by holzz
Blaire White is a useful idiot for right wing dickheads to say, “See that tranny agrees with us” and all the morons who use terms like “woke” and “liberal agenda” are too brain dead to see what they’re being misled into.
Who can say?Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzcarraldo
Do ALL trans people agree with self-ID, as an example? I believe there are a number of trans people who agree with her stances.