Daredevil as a film was mediocre. It could have been soooo much better. But thats not really Bens fault.
Printable View
Daredevil as a film was mediocre. It could have been soooo much better. But thats not really Bens fault.
what about hancock? where does he fit in?
http://www.fasthack.com/images/weblo.../hancock-1.jpg
Or....Me as Harley Quinn, Jamie as the Joker, and Smith as Batman. :)
I'd watch that more than once.
Am I missing something? What's wrong with Ben Afleck? Is this some kind of "look how cool I am, I'm putting down a really successful actor" thing? Daredevil wasn't bad. Jeez, they're all just actors.
Only problem with Marvel is the fact that Sony owns the rights to Spidey, Fox owns the rights to Fantastic Four and X-men, Ghost Rider is with Universal, and the Avengers are with Marvel Studios. Until Marvel can get all the 'universes' under their umbrella they are limited on the crossovers - such as seeing a Spider-man/Fantastic Four crossover. Or seeing a Hulk vs The Thing movie is not gonna happen too soon. Once the contracts end for Marvel and the movie studios-I think you will see more of the Marvel universe open up especially if the SHIELD tv show does well.
I just want them to re-do Ghost Rider and never ever look to Nicholas Cage again for ANY superhero roles.
on a semi related note, I'm lying here watching Rock of Ages on HBO, and this a truly awful movie. However, it's being almost rescued by Malin Akerman, who is really fucking hot. She was in Watchmen, which is how I'm justifying this tangent
that's mankinds logic. when a movie is good, they praise the actor. not the writer and the director.
when a film is terrible, they blame the actor, not the producer, editor or writer.
personally i think affleck should stick to directing. he's actually done one of the best transitions since clooney and eastwood from actor to director.