Some interesting scientific statements there. Let's toss in a bit of sceptical devils advocate. :twisted:
Ok. Since you bring up Dr. Blanchard's ideas I have two questions for you.
As a non scientist do you think that personal attacks such as those against Blanchard or Bailey are the best way to settle scientific questions. (I know the answer is no. Ideally a person's personal business has nothing to do with their work even if it does pointing out facts/further study should be enough to invalidate the invalid or bolster the correct. I just wonder what you think, in your own words? Why do you think what you do?)
Second. Have you heard of this study done in the neatherlands specifically to address concerns of the type you wrote yourself over Dr Blanchard's theories.
Transsexual subtypes: Clinical and theoretical significance
Yolanda L.S. Smith a, Stephanie H.M. van Goozen a,b, A.J. Kuiper c,d,
Peggy T. Cohen-Kettenis
Quote:
Abstract
The present study was designed to investigate whether transsexuals can be validly subdivided into subtypes on the basis of
sexual orientation, and whether differences between subtypes of transsexuals are similar for male-to-female (MF) and femaleto-
male transsexuals (FMs). Within a large transsexual sample (n =187), homosexual and nonhomosexual subjects were
compared on a number of characteristics before the start of treatment. Differences within MF and FM groups were also
investigated. Homosexual transsexuals were found to be younger when applying for sex reassignment, reported a stronger
cross-gender identity in childhood, had a more convincing cross-gender appearance, and functioned psychologically better than
nonhomosexual transsexuals. Moreover, a lower percentage of the homosexual transsexuals reported being (or having been)
married and sexually aroused while cross-dressing. The pattern of findings was different for MFs and FMs. No differences
between homosexuals and nonhomosexuals were found in height, weight, or body mass index. A distinction between subtypes
of transsexuals on the basis of sexual orientation seems theoretically and clinically meaningful. The results support the notion
that in the two groups different factors influence the decision to apply for sex reassignment. The more vulnerable
nonhomosexual transsexuals may particularly benefit from additional professional guidance before and/or during treatment. (Emphasis added by me)
If Dr. Blanchard's theory has no merit explain that finding. Or for that matter how about all the published,
peer reviewed scientific papers you will find links to and references for here. Many of which support at least some aspect of Dr. Blanchard's theory. Going as far back as Benjamin's "Transsexual Phenomenon" (That page is no pro Blanchard rag. The other main person who worked on it is well known to be no "supporter" of that theory.)
