X-critic also against Transsexuals

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

You're not open to criticism. I said your site Shemale Yum has very bad quality models. You lied and said that I slandered them. You also stated that you do not want your company to be criticized.

---

Very bad models? Alyssa Adams, Hazel Tucker, Jenna Rachels, Sofia Ferreira, Sofia Sanders, Acadia Veneer, Angela Skye, Natalie Foxx, Brielle Bop, Cristen Cristensen, Alina Apple, Eva Cassini, Megan, Scarlett, Gianna Riviera, Valerie Daniels, Karissima, Yazlene Reyes, Annalise Rose, Kimora Jade, Danika Dreamz, Venus Lux, Texi Trap, Khloe Reyes, Valerie Alamond ...
Just a handful of models shown in THE LAST 10 WEEKS. Sure not every model is to everyone's taste - but that's the point, it's a site that appeals to many which is why it numbers members in the 1000's.

I don't want my company to be criticized, I strife to be the best and I think we attain it. As stated, I'm the only company to offer this sort of discourse and allow feedback but if you start getting too obnoxious (and you're almost there) then you can fuck off and find a property we don't own to bitch on. I answer feedback all the time and often make changes on it - I'm not going to change our model line-up - based on what "Franklin" thinks is right, you're one mouth and you don't represent more than one mouth.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

You say solo scenes are more popular and are downloaded much more. Well duh! There is so much solo content that its going to be downloaded much more. You thousands of solo scenes compared to a few hardcore scenes. For example You can't compare 1,000 solo scenes' downloads to 100 hardcore scene's downloads(not going for exact numbers). That's terrible data and research. This is learned at an undergraduate level.

---

Huh? Where is the logic in that? If solo scenes were unpopular people wouldn't be joining Shemale Yum, LadyboyLadyboy, Black-Tgirls, Shemale Strokers, Bob'sTgirls etc and membership to Shemale Pornstar, Tgirlpinups, etc would be going through the roof. It's YOU that has the terrible research - it's purile. I'm not measuring 1000 downloads against 100 hardcores, I'm measuring ratios and choices on what people are joining and spending their money on - and THAT is the only relevant data to this business.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

Porn producers also say that straight men buy TS porn. Something is wrong with this data. Straight men do not watch straight solo porn. They watch hardcore porn. Hardcore porn is in high demand among straight men. That's why there are very few to none straight solo sites. It doesn't sell well.

---

Absolute rubbish. I've friends who own some of the biggest solo site companies in the world. You are talking out of your arse, again.

After reading this interesting and entertaining discussion, I do think the producers of content have to understand that they cannot please everyone. Its just the part of making something that people are able to judge. If someone thinks the models are not what they like to see or the standard of content is not up their standards, thats life. A person is entitled to their opinion. At the end of the day sales speaks to a products sucesss. With every product their is room for improvement and critisim helps exposes possilbe weakness. I think the hardest part of critism is taking is listen to the things we don't like.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

Interesting.............why haven't SMC's owner and Shemale Stroker's own been invited to these panels? They've been a while for a long time as well and have success.

---

Go and ask them. I doubt SMC will particpate as they don't really get into the community in general but Sammi is a good guy. Maybe he's just too busy running his awesome website that has been around forever, made a fortune and contain almost all solo scenes! Shemale Strokers is a longtime sponsor of the Tranny Awards.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lifeisfiction

After reading this interesting and entertaining discussion, I do think the producers of content have to understand that they cannot please everyone. Its just the part of making something that people are able to judge. If someone thinks the models are not what they like to see or the standard of content is not up their standards, thats life. A person is entitled to their opinion. At the end of the day sales speaks to a products sucesss. With every product their is room for improvement and critisim helps exposes possilbe weakness. I think the hardest part of critism is taking is listen to the things we don't like.

---

You can never please everyone. You can try to please as many as you can, or you can focus on one specific group and try to cater just to them. That's not an issue. What is an issue is when one asshat, comes along and this isn't new, this has been going on for a couple of years at least, and thinks that his opinion is everyone's opinion. He refuses to listen to the professionals in the industry and refuses to accept that he's usually entirely incorrect and illogical.

Feedback is awesome which is why all of our sites have forums and every cancelling member gets quizzed on what we could do better. We've made massive improvements over the years due to this and tailored sites to the majority - but I refuse to bow or kowtow to the one or two individuals who are too ignorant or short sighted to listen to the facts. Every customer, is not always right. Some customers will never be pleased - and if I can't please them, then they should take their custom elsewhere.

lol - this thread is like a master class in customer service! If I need any PR tips I know where to turn :P

(btw, I agree with Seanchai about the models. No girl will appeal to everyone...)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

I'm just going to say this. You're very stupid. I'm not doing the same thing that Wendy did. I compared two companies' video quality. The samples are videos. Video quality and harcore/solo scenes are two different things. You can't compare them in the same manner. Wendy is improperly comparing solo dvds and hardcore dvds. Her sample has a major flaw. Neither dvd contains the same people. A correct sample must have the same girls in the solo dvd and in the hardcore dvd.

Please go to college. You're stupid.

---

You need to send that scholarship back or give Daddy his money back instead of squandering it on porn instead of an education. She is exactly right in what she is saying. You cannot compare TSSeduction to Shemale Yum? One is a Kink site specializing in BDSM style hardcore full length scenes and the other is a magazine style site, featuring solo and hardcores of new models, current stars and a wide ranges of transgenders. Entirely different markets and customers.
You're a clown!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by loveboof

lol - this thread is like a master class in customer service! If I need any PR tips I know where to turn :P

(btw, I agree with Seanchai about the models. No girl will appeal to everyone...)

---

Bella will be along in a minute and help out even further.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by seanchai

Very bad models? Alyssa Adams, Hazel Tucker, Jenna Rachels, Sofia Ferreira, Sofia Sanders, Acadia Veneer, Angela Skye, Natalie Foxx, Brielle Bop, Cristen Cristensen, Alina Apple, Eva Cassini, Megan, Scarlett, Gianna Riviera, Valerie Daniels, Karissima, Yazlene Reyes, Annalise Rose, Kimora Jade, Danika Dreamz, Venus Lux, Texi Trap, Khloe Reyes, Valerie Alamond ...

---

I'm not going to be rude and say anyone's name. You only listed a handful of the thousands of models. Some of the girls you mention are great quality models like Hazel Tucker, Jenna Rachels, and Acadia Veneer. However, most models on the site do not compare. I won't be listing any names about models who I think should not be in porn. Most of the models at Black T-Girls should not be near porn a studio. Most of them are not close to Natassia Dream's and Paris's league.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by seanchai

I don't want my company to be criticized, I strife to be the best and I think we attain it. As stated, I'm the only company to offer this sort of discourse and allow feedback but if you start getting too obnoxious (and you're almost there) then you can fuck off and find a property we don't own to bitch on. I answer feedback all the time and often make changes on it - I'm not going to change our model line-up - based on what "Franklin" thinks is right, you're one mouth and you don't represent more than one mouth.

---

Oh so you only want praise? I understand that criticism can hurt even if there is no intentions to hurt someone. I criticize myself very often because I am not perfect. I flaws just like everyone else. It is a damn shame to think your company is perfect. No porn company is perfect. I can say a lot of good things about your site. I have some of the best customer service experiences with Grooby sites.

However, I also think the model quality at Shemale Yum is not always up to par. Most models are not in the same league as Hazel Tucker. More strongly, I think the model quality at Black T-Girls is terrible.

Thats what critism is, its never liked it can be constructive or destructive. Ebert reviews movies. Half the movies he likes I think are garbage. His opinions are touted as the voice for the masses (I am not saying that in this case that is what we are dealing with), but thats how is opinion treated. Franklin, is not going to accept your view nor is going to agree with it no matter how much evidence you present.

Here in lies the catch, a person's opinion will not always be liked. I would put money that they are people who feel they way he does, but will never say it.

Seanchai you are proud of your work and someone says something hurtful of course you will take it personally. You have to remember that anything that can be made critical will always invite those opinions. You can't please people all the time.

Time for an interlude .... bad looking girls just for Franklin!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

Has anybody from your production company went to college and taken both Statistics and Methods of Research courses?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

I won't listen to producers until they properly compare the data. There are far too many issues with your samples and how you are comparing the two.

---

Hey Franklin!

Guess what my day job when I'm not making porn is?

I'm an analyst of consumer product sales data.

Your misapplication of your statistics 101 level knowledge is as offensive to my eyes as Michael Crichton's pseudoscience in Jurassic Park would be to a geneticist.

Just say "I like watching blondes with big faked tits get railed rather than stroke" and then walk away.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

I'm not going to be rude and say anyone's name. You only listed a handful of the thousands of models. Some of the girls you mention are great quality models like Hazel Tucker, Jenna Rachels, and Acadia Veneer. However, most models on the site do not compare. I won't be listing any names about models who I think should not be in porn. Most of the models at Black T-Girls should not be near porn a studio. Most of them are not close to Natassia Dream's and Paris's league.

---

They may not be close to Natassia Dreams or Paris's league IN YOUR OPINION. So care to explain why BlackTgirls has been running for 13+ yrs, pays out over $150,000 a year on content?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

Oh so you only want praise? I understand that criticism can hurt even if there is no intentions to hurt someone. I criticize myself very often because I am not perfect. I flaws just like everyone else. It is a damn shame to think your company is perfect. No porn company is perfect. I can say a lot of good things about your site. I have some of the best customer service experiences with Grooby sites.

---

Where did I say I only want praise? I want relevant constructive feedback and people to understand that their opinions, aren't the only ones. That's how we've grown and adapted over the years.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

However, I also think the model quality at Shemale Yum is not always up to par. Most models are not in the same league as Hazel Tucker. More strongly, I think the model quality at Black T-Girls is terrible.

---

That's YOUR perogative and opinion. I won't argue with what YOU think - just don't dare project that is what everyone else thinks, which is what you have been doing. You cannot argue with the facts. I know that some of SMY and BTG's models may be a little early in transition for some, or not the right body shape for some, that's fine ... many of those "early models" go onto to be the biggest stars. Practically every TS model started with a shoot for one of our sites. We launched Shemale.XXX for those who want a more polished modle - and http://www.shemalepornstar.com for those only wanting top models in hardcore scenes. They work well - as does Shemale Yum and Black Tgirls for the members they're aiming at.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

However, I also think the model quality at Shemale Yum is not always up to par. Most models are not in the same league as Hazel Tucker.

---

Uh, most TS website models are not in the same league as Hazel Tucker. She is one of the most beautiful in the world. To think that all models on SMY should be in the same class of looks as her is an insane thought.

SMY caters to all sorts of fans of TS porn. I dont like every single model they showcase but Grooby does a great job of giving the subscriber what they want. The more praise the subscrivers give the model, the more that model is showcased. That is part of running a good business, catering to the fans.

Currently, the site is getting much better in terms of quality. The photographers are improving and the videos are much more erotic and interesting instead of someone whacking it in a chair for ten minutes in the same position like a disintersted robot.

In the argument of solo vs hardcore, TS hardcore scenes really pale in comparision to GG's. Only a handful of models are good in hardcore scenes while some of them look miserable and are not into the scene at all. Hell, half of them are nearly mute while getting nailed. Its tough to get into a scene when the performer looks like they want to leave ASAP.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

I'm not going to be rude and say anyone's name. You only listed a handful of the thousands of models. Some of the girls you mention are great quality models like Hazel Tucker, Jenna Rachels, and Acadia Veneer. However, most models on the site do not compare. I won't be listing any names about models who I think should not be in porn. Most of the models at Black T-Girls should not be near porn a studio. Most of them are not close to Natassia Dream's and Paris's league.

Oh so you only want praise? I understand that criticism can hurt even if there is no intentions to hurt someone. I criticize myself very often because I am not perfect. I flaws just like everyone else. It is a damn shame to think your company is perfect. No porn company is perfect. I can say a lot of good things about your site. I have some of the best customer service experiences with Grooby sites.

However, I also think the model quality at Shemale Yum is not always up to par. Most models are not in the same league as Hazel Tucker. More strongly, I think the model quality at Black T-Girls is terrible.

---

I normally don't comment on things that I'm not quoted in but SERIOUSLY??? THAT (your bold) is what you take from that comment? And you call other people 'stupid'? Just because someone doesn't 'like' something, that isn't a statement to the contrary. I will spell this out for you since you often have reading comprehension problems. Just because a business owner (or anyone for that matter) says they don't like/want criticism, that doesn't inherently mean they only want praise.

Please... look at your own stupidity before you go putting that label on others.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wendy Summers

Hey Franklin!

Guess what my day job when I'm not making porn is?

I'm an analyst of consumer product sales data.

Your misapplication of your statistics 101 level knowledge is as offensive to my eyes as Michael Crichton's pseudoscience in Jurassic Park would be to a geneticist.

Just say "I like watching blondes with big faked tits get railed rather than stroke" and then walk away.

---

I though you'd show up and have something to say about that ��. Know you love your numbers... and understand how raw data and statistics work!

OK... I have pictures and videos to shoot so I'm out :) Been fun, y'all ��.

@ Seanachi, are you trying to make call out peeople? Okay.....I'm only judging this week's updates. Jenna Rachel is the only quality model for this week's updates.

You have even said that you have shot TVs for TS sites. How is are they good quality models when they are not TS women?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sherm13

Uh, most TS website models are not in the same league as Hazel Tucker. She is one of the most beautiful in the world. To think that all models on SMY should be in the same class of looks as her is an insane thought.

---

How is it insane to want quality models? Is everyone going to be in Hazel's league? No. Asking for quality models is very reasonable.

Do you think Black T-Girls have a good amount of quality models? I'm so curious about this answer.

[QUOTE=FRANKLIN;1253431How is it insane to want quality models? Is everyone going to be in Hazel's league? No. Asking for quality models is very reasonable.

Do you think Black T-Girls have a good amount of quality models? I'm so curious about this answer.[/QUOTE]

SMY puts out all sorts of TV/TS models each week. You keep throwing out the word "quality" but expect SMY to show your kind of quality when in fact they showcase all sorts of TV/TS models. So if you find a TV to not be quality because they are a TV, then you shouldnt join that site as they arent just going to have superstars.

As far as Black T-Girls is concerned, I cant say that they feature the most attractive gals on the planet but they are catering to a very specific group and its tough to fill weekly updates with just Black T-girls. I just dont subscribe to that site and I can live with that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sherm13

SMY puts out all sorts of TV/TS models each week. You keep throwing out the word "quality" but expect SMY to show your kind of quality when in fact they showcase all sorts of TV/TS models. So if you find a TV to not be quality because they are a TV, then you shouldnt join that site as they arent just going to have superstars.

As far as Black T-Girls is concerned, I cant say that they feature the most attractive gals on the planet but they are catering to a very specific group and its tough to fill weekly updates with just Black T-girls. I just dont subscribe to that site and I can live with that.

---

I respect your opinion about Black T-Girls.com.

I cannot respect your opinion about TVs on TS sites. Shemale Yum does not say TV Yum. The site's name is Shemale. The site does not say that TV men will be featured. Shemales are TS women. TVs are not transsexuals. A TV should not be featured on any TS site.

As a black t girl model i take offence to that assholes.i get so fucking tired of people talking shit about black girls you racist twats

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

I respect your opinion about Black T-Girls.com.

I cannot respect your opinion about TVs on TS sites. Shemale Yum does not say TV Yum. The site's name is Shemale. The site does not say that TV men will be featured. Shemales are TS women. TVs are not transsexuals. A TV should not be featured on any TS site.

---

So, just for clarity here... and since you're an expert on the topic...

I would like you to put down here, in writing, what your qualifications for being featured on a "TS" site are. And if you say, "being TS" then you really are either stupid or a total fraud. Go ahead.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amberskyi

As a black t girl model i take offence to that assholes.i get so fucking tired of people talking shit about black girls you racist twats

---

I take offense to people throwing out accusations of racism when it is not called for. Its not like I called every girl on the site a dog but there are few TV's who are just there because of their huge wangs and do not really look feminine at all. That look doesnt do it for me. There are plenty of black t-girls who are gorgeous.

I will say this, I just looked at the preview section at Blacktgirls.com and the quality seems much improved from just a few years ago.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GroobyKrissy

So, just for clarity here... and since you're an expert on the topic...

I would like you to put down here, in writing, what your qualifications for being featured on a "TS" site are. And if you say, "being TS" then you really are either stupid or a total fraud. Go ahead.

---

If a site's name is Shemale, Tranny, TS, Trassexual, or any other term people rightfully or wrongfully use to advertise TS should only feature TS women. If a site includes TV men then the site needs a different name. M2F transsexuals are women. TVs are not women.

Being a TS is required to be on a TS site with the sole exception of the person's hardcore partner. However, the scene should contain at least one TS.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amberskyi

As a black t girl model i take offence to that assholes.i get so fucking tired of people talking shit about black girls you racist twats

---

This is funny. I'm black. I don't find most black GG women attractive. I don't find most black TS women attractive. Is that racist? No! I'm not sexually attracted to most of them. Who are you to tell someone who they should find attractive?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

If a site's name is Shemale, Tranny, TS, Trassexual, or any other term people rightfully or wrongfully use to advertise TS should only feature TS women. If a site includes TV men then the site needs a different name. M2F transsexuals are women. TVs are not women.

Being a TS is required to be on a TS site with the sole exception of the person's hardcore partner. However, the scene should contain at least one TS.

---

so you're stupid, a fraud, AND chicken. Great!
You basically said nothing... One more try?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sherm13

I take offense to people throwing out accusations of racism when it is not called for. Its not like I called every girl on the site a dog but there are few TV's who are just there because of their huge wangs and do not really look feminine at all. That look doesnt do it for me. There are plenty of black t-girls who are gorgeous.

I will say this, I just looked at the preview section at Blacktgirls.com and the quality seems much improved from just a few years ago.

---

i know just as many popular white, hispanic and asain models who in my opinion arent fem at all but are popular because of their big cocks or ability to cum a small lake.it isnt a phenomena exclusive to black tgirls but one that is common to ts porn in general

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GroobyKrissy

so you're stupid, a fraud, AND chicken. Great!
You basically said nothing... One more try?

---

If you think it is okay for a TS site to feature a TV then something is clearly wrong with you. Featuring a TV in a solo scene is FRAUD. The person is not a transsexual woman. The person is a man in a wig.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amberskyi

i know just as many popular white, hispanic and asain models who in my opinion arent fem at all but are popular because of their big cocks or ability to cum a small lake.it isnt a phenomena exclusive to black tgirls but one that is common to ts porn in general

---

Care to tell us who these people are? It's difficult to fully judge your opinion without comparing the models.

I find women attractive in general, but in terms of modeling I will say on BTG there seems to be more extremes in the models featured.

But like I said, I dig Black girls so I'd probably say at least half of the girls on BTG are alright.
Really there are so many pretty to stunning Black tgirls featured that it kinda balances out the more questionable ones.

And yeah I don't like TVs being featured and them being sold to us as 'early transition' TGs. I KNOW some of those are just gay dudes working that hustle with a wig and lipstick.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

This is funny. I'm black. I don't find most black GG women attractive. I don't find most black TS women attractive. Is that racist? No! I'm not sexually attracted to most of them. Who are you to tell someone who they should find attractive?

---

than why use black tgirls as an example of mediocre models? if you dont find black girls attractive than cool but dont try to insinuate that all black models are of poor quality. im not a fan of black men my damn self but i can realize when one fits the typical standards of attractiveness.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

If you think it is okay for a TS site to feature a TV then something is clearly wrong with you. Featuring a TV in a solo scene is FRAUD. The person is not a transsexual woman. The person is a man in a wig.

---

So, basically just say that you're either chicken to put down your definitions or that you really don't know... in either case, you've pretty much lost credibility to comment further at all. I know this is coming but I really don't want to spell out why, so please make the effort to connect a few threads of logic.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amberskyi

i know just as many popular white, hispanic and asain models who in my opinion arent fem at all but are popular because of their big cocks or ability to cum a small lake.it isnt a phenomena exclusive to black tgirls but one that is common to ts porn in general

---

That is true, however there was a time when Blacktgirls.com was filled with at least half of that criteria, more so than any other Grooby site. I wouldnt pay $35.99 a month for that prodcut, personally. Like I said, after looking at the previews on the site a few minutes ago, the models appear a lot more feminine now. There are many gorgeous girls of different ethnicites and I do not discriminiate against anyone. I really do not know how pointing out why I would not purchase a membership for that site makes me a racist.

Plus, there are many quality black tgirl models but I do not always see them on Grooby sites.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by giovanni_hotel

I find women attractive in general, but in terms of modeling I will say on BTG there seems to be more extremes in the models featured.

But like I said, I dig Black girls so I'd probably say at least half of the girls on BTG are alright.
Really there are so many pretty to stunning Black tgirls featured that it kinda balances out the more questionable ones.

And yeah I don't like TVs being featured and them being sold to us as 'early transition' TGs. I KNOW some of those are just gay dudes working that hustle with a wig and lipstick.

---

I already know you run from confrontation but I'll give you the same opportunity as I gave Franklin. In writing... What are your qualifications for someone appearing on a "TS" site?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by giovanni_hotel

I find women attractive in general, but in terms of modeling I will say on BTG there seems to be more extremes in the models featured.

But like I said, I dig Black girls so I'd probably say at least half of the girls on BTG are alright.
Really there are so many pretty to stunning Black tgirls featured that it kinda balances out the more questionable ones.

And yeah I don't like TVs being featured and them being sold to us as 'early transition' TGs. I KNOW some of those are just gay dudes working that hustle with a wig and lipstick.

---

i see the same damn extremes on shemale yum as well.
and who are you to decide if an early transitioner is a real ts woman or not? are you going by physical appearance? theres no way for you to know that other than sitting down with the person one on one and asking.not every girls starts out with a natural femininity some it takes years of hormones and surgery.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amberskyi

than why use black tgirls as an example of mediocre models? if you dont find black girls attractive than cool but dont try to insinuate that all black models are of poor quality. im not a fan of black men my damn self but i can realize when one fits the typical standards of attractiveness.

---

I find most black girls to be unattractive so I would find most of them to be poor quality models. If I thought otherwise then I would be contradicting myself. I understand why people find certain body types attractive.

I understand why guys are into you. You're a very passable TS woman. However, there are many other black Ts women on the site who are clearly not passable. Some are more buff than John Cena. They don't fit into the typical standards of attractiveness.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

I find most black girls to be unattractive so I would find most of them to be poor quality models. If I thought otherwise then I would be contradicting myself. I understand why people find certain body types attractive.

I understand why guys are into you. You're a very passable TS woman. However, there are many other black Ts women on the site who are clearly not passable. Some are more buff than John Cena. They don't fit into the typical standards of attractiveness.

---

again your missing my point.its unfair to say that just because someone isnt your type that they are a poor model.
i will make the same comparission:im not into black guys but im not going to say that all black men are ugly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amberskyi

i see the same damn extremes on shemale yum as well.
and who are you to decide if an early transitioner is a real ts woman or not? are you going by physical appearance? theres no way for you to know that other than sitting down with the person one on one and asking.not every girls starts out with a natural femininity some it takes years of hormones and surgery.

---

nice to see this logic hit home with you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amberskyi

i see the same damn extremes on shemale yum as well.
and who are you to decide if an early transitioner is a real ts woman or not? are you going by physical appearance? theres no way for you to know that other than sitting down with the person one on one and asking.not every girls starts out with a natural femininity some it takes years of hormones and surgery.

---

FYI, not trying to be mean. Seanachi has posted in the past that he does shoot TVs for the TS sites..............

Jamie Bankurm is one of these TVs. Jamie is a gay man who does gay porn. However, companies like Grooby and Shemale Strokers shoot him with women's clothing and a wig.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GroobyKrissy

I already know you run from confrontation but I'll give you the same opportunity as I gave Franklin. In writing... What are your qualifications for someone appearing on a "TS" site?

---

having awkward implants that look like someone shoved a fish bowl under the models chest lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

I find most black girls to be unattractive so I would find most of them to be poor quality models. If I thought otherwise then I would be contradicting myself. I understand why people find certain body types attractive.

I understand why guys are into you. You're a very passable TS woman. However, there are many other black Ts women on the site who are clearly not passable. Some are more buff than John Cena. They don't fit into the typical standards of attractiveness.

---

the market for black ts are mostly tv's with big dicks posing as ts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKLIN

If a site's name is Shemale, Tranny, TS, Trassexual, or any other term people rightfully or wrongfully use to advertise TS should only feature TS women. If a site includes TV men then the site needs a different name. M2F transsexuals are women. TVs are not women.

Being a TS is required to be on a TS site with the sole exception of the person's hardcore partner. However, the scene should contain at least one TS.

---

So I'll open up a can of worms here LOL

Franklin, in your mind's eye, what am I? (Besides unattractive to you - which is fine you're not my target market ;))

I've been off of hormones for almost all of my porn career due to medical issues.
I have never had any medical enhancements to my body: no surgeries; no pumping etc.


Am I a TS in your world view?