OJ Tossed from Steakhouse on Derby Eve

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Realgirls4me

Don't hate him for murdering a white woman, Hate him for murdering and getting away with it, period.

---

alright people ......calm down!! First of all this clown is an idiot!! We go by law in this country and for someone to make up their own is wrong. OJ was tried in a court of law and we all saw it on national tv. As guilty as OJ looked their was twice as many holes in the story and mistakes by the LAPD! Here are a couple I have been wondering about....

1) Why would an experienced police officer who knows policy bring evidence to the scene of the crime that was submitted at the station?

2) Why was there a chemical that was used to preserve blood samples found in the blood on the back gate?

3) Why after going through OJ's house with video did it take them weeks to find the bloody sock sitting right in the bedroom?

4) Everyone knows that in today's forensic world no matter how many times you scrubbed a sink....yourself.....clothes .....or a washing machine...you can't stop the blood from showing up under testing. So that being said.......why wasn't there any blood in OJ's home? There is no way you are gonna hack up 2 people that way and not get any blood on you!
If he raced home,jumped the fence,quickly showered,and hopped in the limo that was already waiting for him......how could he leave his entire house without a spec of blood in it??

I do not like OJ like the rest of you.......but don't you wonder these things??? The wild...crazed swinging of a knife doesn't match with the precision time management of the window of which to operate with. Whether that idiot did it or not.......The LAPD clearly broke protocol...and tampered with evidence which is why this case turned out the way it did. If they had conducted themselves properly maybe OJ goes to jail.

So in closing...........If a man is found not guilty it is not my responsibility to punish said man for the rest of his life when I had no relation or friendship to anyone in the case. That is flirting close to being a vigilante. We might as well run him out back....throw a rope over a tree.....well you see where I am going!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mustang

alright people ......calm down!! First of all this clown is an idiot!! We go by law in this country and for someone to make up their own is wrong. OJ was tried in a court of law and we all saw it on national tv. As guilty as OJ looked their was twice as many holes in the story and mistakes by the LAPD! Here are a couple I have been wondering about....

1) Why would an experienced police officer who knows policy bring evidence to the scene of the crime that was submitted at the station?

2) Why was there a chemical that was used to preserve blood samples found in the blood on the back gate?

3) Why after going through OJ's house with video did it take them weeks to find the bloody sock sitting right in the bedroom?

4) Everyone knows that in today's forensic world no matter how many times you scrubbed a sink....yourself.....clothes .....or a washing machine...you can't stop the blood from showing up under testing. So that being said.......why wasn't there any blood in OJ's home? There is no way you are gonna hack up 2 people that way and not get any blood on you!
If he raced home,jumped the fence,quickly showered,and hopped in the limo that was already waiting for him......how could he leave his entire house without a spec of blood in it??

I do not like OJ like the rest of you.......but don't you wonder these things??? The wild...crazed swinging of a knife doesn't match with the precision time management of the window of which to operate with. Whether that idiot did it or not.......The LAPD clearly broke protocol...and tampered with evidence which is why this case turned out the way it did. If they had conducted themselves properly maybe OJ goes to jail.

So in closing...........If a man is found not guilty it is not my responsibility to punish said man for the rest of his life when I had no relation or friendship to anyone in the case. That is flirting close to being a vigilante. We might as well run him out back....throw a rope over a tree.....well you see where I am going!

---

If you think that there's a chance in hell that OJ is innocent, then there's some swampland for sale in Florida with your name written all over it...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chefmike

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mustang

alright people ......calm down!! First of all this clown is an idiot!! We go by law in this country and for someone to make up their own is wrong. OJ was tried in a court of law and we all saw it on national tv. As guilty as OJ looked their was twice as many holes in the story and mistakes by the LAPD! Here are a couple I have been wondering about....

1) Why would an experienced police officer who knows policy bring evidence to the scene of the crime that was submitted at the station?

2) Why was there a chemical that was used to preserve blood samples found in the blood on the back gate?

3) Why after going through OJ's house with video did it take them weeks to find the bloody sock sitting right in the bedroom?

4) Everyone knows that in today's forensic world no matter how many times you scrubbed a sink....yourself.....clothes .....or a washing machine...you can't stop the blood from showing up under testing. So that being said.......why wasn't there any blood in OJ's home? There is no way you are gonna hack up 2 people that way and not get any blood on you!
If he raced home,jumped the fence,quickly showered,and hopped in the limo that was already waiting for him......how could he leave his entire house without a spec of blood in it??

I do not like OJ like the rest of you.......but don't you wonder these things??? The wild...crazed swinging of a knife doesn't match with the precision time management of the window of which to operate with. Whether that idiot did it or not.......The LAPD clearly broke protocol...and tampered with evidence which is why this case turned out the way it did. If they had conducted themselves properly maybe OJ goes to jail.

So in closing...........If a man is found not guilty it is not my responsibility to punish said man for the rest of his life when I had no relation or friendship to anyone in the case. That is flirting close to being a vigilante. We might as well run him out back....throw a rope over a tree.....well you see where I am going!

---

If you think that there's a chance in hell that OJ is innocent, then there's some swampland for sale in Florida with your name written all over it...

---

I posted good questions for people to think over.....there are many other ways to kill someone you want dead. Has anyone ever thought that he payed to have it done??

I am looking for an answer for any of those questions I have been struggling with since 1994.....if you got em....post em!

I believe the court got the verdit correct and that he did not commit the crime. The many times police made-up stories about me give me plenty of personal reasons why I believe they knew he was not guilty of the murder. The family that lived off of his earnings now turned against him. So why should he show love towards them. They also wanted to steal his children. In regards to the Goldmans, he could have shown more compassion for their family member.

Everyone knows he has a "BIG HEAD" and doesn't care what people outside of his family think. If so many people had not fawned all over him when he only performed a job (running back in professional football) well, he may not the big-headed monster he is now. Stop placing people in the entertainment industry above everyone else who works HARD for a living, then these knuckleheads would probably act more like normal people.

Yes, he physically and mentally abused the woman and was found guilty or liable. He paid the price for those law violations. But murder is a much higher level of physical attack than abuse. And we do NOT KNOW ALL the TRUE facts of this crime.

But, it seems most of you with anger do NOT know the full details of the crime. Only what the news media has fed you and your own limited knowledge of the facts.

So I reiterate, he did not commit the crime.

If you think that there's a chance in hell that OJ is innocent, then there's some swampland for sale in Florida with your name written all over it...

Video Interview of OJ after the trial. You make your own desicion.


http://youtube.com/watch?v=f0aAE6ie7bM



btw if anybody happens to know the link for the long version I appreciate it if you could post it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mustang

I am looking for an answer for any of those questions I have been struggling with since 1994.....if you got em....post em!

---

Can't remember who said it, but...

"The LAPD. framed a guilty man".

I heard a guy say this on a talk show today and I agree:
"White people need to let this go. They want black people to get over slavery, they need to get over OJ". The shit is old. It's over. HISTORY!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Realgirls4me

By the way, I applaud the restaurant owner for what he did. I just don't understand this culture of celebrity we exist in that can and will overlook a man's crimes and still fawn, including having women -- any woman -- still want to date him. I don't hate him for murdering a white woman, I hate him for murdering and getting away with it, period.

The same hatred goes toward Blake, Shatner(?), or Spector. Just as in OJ's case, it's about celebrity trumping justice, and that gives these guys an edge that the average Joe doesn't ever get.

---

Cosign.

-Quinn