Just peeked at the thread, so I may have more to offer later.Quote:
I'd have to say that the article is heavily biased against any male who is attracted to a tgirl.
I agree on this note. While I can relate to =some= of the 'admirer' role and =some= of the date/client' role, I can't exactly place myself in either of those categories without spilling over into some othe rdefinition.
Did Ann Coulter write this drivel?Quote:
This is definitely oversimplification. While there are definitely elements of truth here, it sounds like the author was mad at someone or more likely generalized a series of experiences and observations of forums like this.
Some horse's ass signed off on a post one night by calling me a 'chaser'. Personally, I thought of it as a sort of promotion (And stated as such). Some of us, in our own minds anyway, have taken on the term in some small way similar to how gays adopted 'queer', lesbians took on 'dyke' and blacks embraced 'nigger' in ways that they could refer to themselves in a non-derogatory manor. When Richard Pryor pronounced "This nigger's crazy!" and Lea Delaria proclaimed on national teevee that she was a "Biiiiiggg DYKE!" they took the fire and brimstone out of the words and threw them into everyday lexicon.Quote:
This piece does however illustrate why I'm only slightly more comfortable with the term "admirer" than I am with "tranny chaser": neither represents the truth and depth of my attraction, though one is less insulting (both to myself and to those to whom I am attracted).
So, am I a 'chaser' because I'm dick-centric and like the big ones? No way to tell, really. In the end (Mine or thiers) it's up to the gulrs to decide.
Many words. Whoa! :shock:Quote:
MacShreach
Very thought out and on the mark. I'll have to digest this some. I see myself in there somewhere...Somewhere.