WHO'S THE PARTY OF LINCOLN?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TFan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Quinn

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TFan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Quinn

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TFan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Quinn

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by guyone

You're abosolutly right and if everyone stopped whining about this and that (blood for oil and the rest of the communist propaganda) and just get the job done it wouldr be acomplished by now.

---

Yeah, that's the problem. It's not a matter of poor planning or implementation on the part of the Bush Administration. It's people complaining.

Within the Republican party itself, discontentment runs deep due to the view that Bush's Neoconservativism has strayed far from traditional Republican values – particularly with regard to both his fiscal polices, or lack thereof, and foreign policy.

Seriously, why do you think Giuliani and McCain are receiving so much support form the moderate wing of the Republican Party? They're not Neoconservatives.

-Quinn

---

That's a poor diversion of the intent of guyone's statement.

---

If you say so, but the points still stand.

-Quinn

---

Which point? That you opportunistically distorted the mans words?

---

LMAO..... You are joking, right? Seriously, have you seen guyone's posts, let alone your own? How am I doing anything you and other posers (lefties and righties) don't routinely do? You're just upste because you disagree with the message.

-Quinn

---

You can make this personal if you want. The point stands. Your dishonest attempt to distort guyone's post is manipulative and weak.

---

The only thing weak here is your hypocrisy. Stop whinning, deal with it, and move on.

-Quinn

Nothing short of a personal attack. You're standing on nothing. Just empty words.

More whining about an exchange started by your own hypocrisy. So far as any measurement of empty words is concerned, there is no greater testament to said phenomenon than the extremely low regard the forum at large has repeatedly shown for you and your sactimonius opinions.

-Quinn

You done with the pissing contest?

You engaged me, so how about answering your own question?

-Quinn

I engaged your words. You engaged in personal attacks.

TFan, don’t be obtuse. Guyone responded to Trish’s point concerning Iraq (blood for oil, etc.), at which point I responded to his post – by citing the Bush Administration’s poor performance and the results of that performance. You couldn’t argue the point, so you took it upon yourself to issue forth the following drivel: “your dishonest attempt to distort guyone's post is manipulative and weak.” Furthermore, given your record of personal attacks on this forum, your position is, once again, little more than hypocrisy.

Seriously, be man enough to stand behind your conduct. Don’t behave like some passive-aggressive teenage girl.

-Quinn

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Quinn

TFan, don’t be obtuse. Guyone responded to Trish’s point concerning Iraq (blood for oil, etc.), at which point I responded to his post

---

No, you didn't respond. You made a manipulative attempt to distort what he said..... misrepresent it. You know that's not what he meant but you went on anyway, "Yeah, that's the problem. It's not a matter of poor planning or implementation on the part of the Bush Administration."

Talk about "passive aggressive teenage girl". You went on the offensive with words and when called on those words, you're sheepishly attempting to parse them.

Passive-aggressive? You took the words right out of my mouth, Quinn!

Take it easy on T Fool though, he's a pair of pliers or two short of a toolbox...or maybe I should have said TFoolbox.

Well, I guess you are that obtuse after all – so I’ll explain it as simply as possible. Try to keep up:

1. Trish made a comment about the US doing for Iraq what she felt Iraq should be doing for itself;
2. Guyone responded that “if everyone stopped whining about this and that (blood for oil and the rest of the communist propaganda) and just get the job done it would be accomplished by now,” which, by any reasonable act of interpretation, clearly puts the blame for Iraq dragging on with individuals who dissent against the Bush Administration’s Iraq policy.
3. I responded by making clear that it was the Bush Administration’s poor planning and implementation that was responsible, following it up with a point about the effects said administration’s deleterious policies have had even among the Republican base.

Guess what? That response is entirely appropriate to the point at hand. You couldn’t deal with it, so you attempted to characterize said point – and by extension me – as dishonest. Once again, stop whining like a passive-aggressive teenage girl and stand behind your conduct – hypocritical though it may be.

Fact One: You constantly insert yourself into people's threads and attempt to turn their posts into a liberal vs. conservative argument when that is not what the poster intended or even referenced.

Fact Two: You constantly engage in personal attacks (your sig is but one of many examples).

Fact Three: You are being a hypocrite right now.

-Quinn