Quote:
Originally Posted by jaycanuck
Quote:
Originally Posted by duplicatt
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaycanuck
Quote:
Originally Posted by raybbaby
They were living on top of our oil, damnit Jay!
haha! That's the answer I wanted to hear! Heaven forbid they took those billions spent on the war and develop new energy sources. But...silly me, I'm sure it wasn't about oil. :roll:
If it were just about oil, we'd have invaded Canada and Mexico instead.
Wrong. You'd have a hell of a harder time convincing the international community to bomb Toronto. And wrong...it was oil. Spin it anyway you want, it was to secure interest in oil reserves in Iraq. Even Mr. Greenspan admits it. 18 year republican....can't go against him can you?
Quote:
“I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil,”
We wouldn't need the international community to bomb Toronto to take over Canada. We'd have just driven north into Alberta (and probably let Parti Québécois have their way with Quebec to buy off that segment of the population).
And, if it was to secure Iraqi oil for the US, then why are we not importing all of it here regardless of what the international community and putative rulers of Iraq say? And how come a British company (BP) got the contracts? The results do not support your claim (or Mr. Greenspan's).
But, at least you aren't claiming that it was to topple Hussein for trying to kill HW.