Originally Posted by Niccolo
I'm not clear about your position on Islam: you agree that if one looks back through history, one will find plenty bad things to be said about Islam, as bad as anything that could be said about Christianity, and you argue that "going off the deep end with religion" leads to people carrying out acts of "religious fanaticism." Or as we tend to say, terrorism. Well, ok then.
Wouldn't it be correct to say "going off the deep end" of Islam? And to talk of "Islamic fanaticism"? After all, the people you are talking about don't become (for example) Buddhists, and like many of the Tibetan monks who have been jailed by the Chinese, try to find compassion for others, no matter what their behaviour is like.
We've all seen plenty examples in recent years of people going off the deep end of Islam. We all know what that can lead to. Again I'll say that there might have been one big terrorist attack in America seven years ago, but there have been many more around the world since, and one can only imagine what it would be like having to deal with terrorist attacks every day.
On one hand then, you seem to be arguing that Islam can be as cruel and evil as any other religion has ever been, and that Israelis have had to deal with people "going off the deep end" of Islam, which leads to "fanatical" Muslims committing terrorist attacks upon Israeli citizens.
On the other you seem terribly reluctant to acknowledge that Islam has anything to do with the whole situation.
Isn't it possible that it just might be a factor here? And how can one say for sure until one looks at what Islam actually teaches? And at what it's followers have said, and done, in the past?