Naw, just meaning the easiest way to resolve a problem is to convince people that there is no problem. If this can be done than you would not have to actually solve the problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by trish
Printable View
Naw, just meaning the easiest way to resolve a problem is to convince people that there is no problem. If this can be done than you would not have to actually solve the problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by trish
this thread is an example of creating a problem when there is no problem actualy .Quote:
Originally Posted by deee757
That is not grist for the mill, it is complete, unadulterated crap. It is bullshit from the first sentence, and trust me, THC, that is the last time I will ever take the trouble to actually read a site you refer me to.Quote:
Originally Posted by thx1138
I could go through it point by point and refute every single one, but the fact is, it would make no difference because
a) the people who believe this conspiracy bullshit are utter morons devoid of the slightest capacity for intelligent or logical thought, as has been demonstrated more than adequately by the moron-in-chief, you, and many many others in this thread alone
and
b) the conspiracy theories themselves are promulgated by self-publicising disinformation merchants who know perfectly well that the the aforesaid dunderheads will not only believe any old codswallop that is fed to them, they'll pay to be told it. From Erich von Danichen onwards, these people have been making fortunes from idiots like you.
There is no Bermuda Triangle, spacemen did not build the pyramids, there are no aliens hidden at Area 51, and the Apollo astronauts did go to the moon.
Case closed.
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
I'm glad you didn't mention chem trails. They are quite real.
Nasa launching an unmanned mission to the moon for data. First in 10 years.
http://www.wric.com/global/story.asp?s=10558478
Lol, i thought we already had the data
So what's your complaint? The Moon's a large place and data on its geography, surface geology and interior structure will never be complete as long as there are completing theories and hypothesis to test and weed.
What's laughable is that someone thinks one mission a decade ago could provide all the data that we ever need; the implication being that if we still need data that mission must not have ever taken place. lol
The new orbiting probe has as one of it's missions, to photograph the old Apollo landing sites. At first, I thought that would settle the issue once and for all, but I'm sure that there are plenty of "sceptics" who will just claim that those photos were faked, as well.
trish ,a conspiracy is not something you can contradict by small un-important details known as FACTS :wink:Quote:
Originally Posted by trish
Yea, i got u, and while we are at it, why doesn't Spain send another ship around the world in search for more land. Lol, and the article says NASA wants to return a man to the moon by 2020, 50 years after the first landing. Also ironic that China says it would take them until 2020 to develop the technology to make it possible for them to send a man to the moon.