Re: Someone needs to sue the TSA
Re: Someone needs to sue the TSA
Quote:
Originally Posted by
thombergeron
:banghead
passenger and cargo screening does not increase your odds of getting there safe. Period.
It only makes you think that your odds of getting there safe are increased.
Do you see the difference? One is real, one is not real.
what are you fuckin stupid?fuck off you idiot
Re: Someone needs to sue the TSA
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lisaparadise
you people make me laugh you think your government is out to get you meanwhile there out to save you are you people that stupid that you think everything is a conspiracy to strip you of your rights?
I got a friend who is like that. He is constantly talking about how the government was behind 911 and how the N.W.O is going to take over the world. He occassionally sprouts off about the return of Jesus and whatnot.
People protest when the gov't does nothing, then when the gov't does something. People protest because they do not like what the gov't implemented.
Re: Someone needs to sue the TSA
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bte
i got a friend who is like that. He is constantly talking about how the government was behind 911 and how the n.w.o is going to take over the world. He occassionally sprouts off about the return of jesus and whatnot.
People protest when the gov't does nothing, then when the gov't does something. People protest because they do not like what the gov't implemented.
24 pages of stupidity unfuckingbelievable.
Re: Someone needs to sue the TSA
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lisaparadise
24 pages of stupidity unfuckingbelievable.
I agree. Why don't the TSA just implement profiling. I am not talking about racial profiling, because Muslims can be white, middle eastern, black, asian, or whatever. But don't pat down a kid or a senior simply because they are the 10th person in the line.
Re: Someone needs to sue the TSA
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bte
I agree. Why don't the TSA just implement profiling. I am not talking about racial profiling, because Muslims can be white, middle eastern, black, asian, or whatever. But don't pat down a kid or a senior simply because they are the 10th person in the line.
i agree trust me i was in line at pearson coming home from florida and there was 3 black guys infront of me and 3 cololombians behind me and im the one who had to get searched in the back room you could here me yelling swear words from me for miles i was absolutly discusted
Re: Someone needs to sue the TSA
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bte
I got a friend who is like that. He is constantly talking about how the government was behind 911 and how the N.W.O is going to take over the world. He occassionally sprouts off about the return of Jesus and whatnot.
The government is behind 9/11, the NWO is coming (EU, AU, soon-to-be NAU, etc). There's evidence to show for each of these allegations. There is, however, no evidence of the second coming of Jesus.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bte
People protest when the gov't does nothing, then when the gov't does something. People protest because they do not like what the gov't implemented.
And sometimes the government takes advantage of that line of thinking and doesn't even bother to think things through. Why should they, ya know? People are going to complain regardless, right? So why bother trying?
~BB~
Re: Someone needs to sue the TSA
There's no evidence the U.S. gov't was behind 911 except in kooksville.
Re: Someone needs to sue the TSA
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fred41
There's no evidence the U.S. gov't was behind 911 except in kooksville.
Really? You've always seen 110 story buildings fall straight down as a result of a crash above the 80th floors? No evidence? The video of the controlled demolition is just the tip of the iceberg.
Did you know that Silverstein actually authorized the demolition of WTC7? How could he have done that unless it was already set up for such an event?
~BB~
Re: Someone needs to sue the TSA
Bella,
I am a firefighter. I watched the 2nd plane crash into the building live. I had just gotten off shift. Honest to God, my concern after watching the building burn for as long as it did was the risk of collapse.
What I didn't know then, but do know now from watching and reading about the construction was that it was built in a system called truss construction.
Truss construction is popular for several reasons. It's used in a lot of warehouses. Truss construction is strong and allows less material to be used to make it lighter. The major problem with truss construction is that when one truss goes, you will almost 100% of the time, have a complete and utter failure of all the supports. Which is what you saw with the towers.
Steel begins to fail at 1200 degrees F. Its not that it's melting but that means it will twist and contort very quickly at 1200 degrees. With that in mind, the load (weight) of the building wouldnt take long to collapse. An average house fire will reach 1100 degree F in about 3 1/2 minutes.
There was a fire in 1999 in Worcester that killed 6 Firefighers. They said that the temperature in the cold storage warehouse reached 3000 degrees and there was very little material to burn there.
So, how hot do you think it was with a plane full of jet fuel exploding into both towers?
It wasnt a controlled demolition. That's what the conspiracy theorists want you to believe. They try to point out little things that would lend to their crazy ideas.
I cant speak about #7....
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BellaBellucci
Really? You've always seen 110 story buildings fall straight down as a result of a crash above the 80th floors? No evidence? The video of the controlled demolition is just the tip of the iceberg.
Did you know that Silverstein actually authorized the demolition of WTC7? How could he have done that unless it was already set up for such an event?
~BB~