The are all real nice love to meet them.
Printable View
The are all real nice love to meet them.
Yes thats the thing, these are pretty much all STUDIO shots with big source BEAUTY lighting, SMART simple sets and props, Excellent WARDROBE that fits, excellent HAIR and MAKE-UP and good solid EVERYDAY (but not extreme) RETOUCHING. You are seeing professional Playboy, Vogue, Surface, Maxim like glamour photography.Quote:
Originally Posted by Frenchboy
This Russian site does NOT feature rushed amature photography in some crappy motel room with on-camera flash or dumb light placement, little or no makeup, (or even washup), used clothing and straight to to site-slam it up post-production (ie NO retouching) ASAP. Most TS porn sites we are normally exposed to are like this...
It's the difference between Playboy and Photo Journalism. You have seen and are used to most US TGirl porn sites now you're seeing something different that you haven't mostly seen before.
And if you are feeeling like you ain't getting "the truth" about the girls with all this "professionallism" just think how much fantasy is really involved with you being a TS voyuer. If you actually 'do' escorts every night then you are overloaded with truth. But if you rub one out to a screen of beauty and hardly ever meet the real flesh... which would you rather view (or rub one out to)?
Alot of T-girls really go way long on their path to their own personal beauty. (I mean getting surgery and hormons is pretty rough) Since these girls risk so much to do this, I think it would be great to see more professional images like www.Dosug.Nu. It would go a long way to demonstrate the same respect and adoration that upscale media like Playboy bestowed on everyday naked GGs when it started.
Hey both forms are relevant and it's your choice.
Every word right on the money. Co-sign. WORD. What you said. What the fuck ever. You're so absolutely right.Quote:
Originally Posted by Foto
People are so used to looking at crap, badly exposed, badly focussed, badly composed "photographs" taken with inappropriate lenses and abominable lighting, sorry, on-camera twinky flash, that they actually accuse people of cheating when they see a half decent pro job. Jeez!
I've said it before so I'll say it again: most TS photographs you see are utter, unadulterated crap that any self-respecting photographer would be ashamed to admit having taken. And the video work is even worse.
Well, I'll tell you: I used to put my twenty-five or thirty bucks every month towards one of the TS sites. Over the years I've been on quite a few. NO MORE. That's it, finito. I'll go back to pic sharing, even though it does "strangle the porn industry." Why? Because the TS porn industry product is so unbelievably shit it does not deserve any support at all, and if a few of the companies producing it start to feel their financial pips being squeezed they might actually hire some real photographers and give their customers a product worth buying.
I would be ashamed to sell the crap these people sell. If the pornographers get stuffed for selling shite I feel no sympathy for them.
<EDIT> I won't name and shame (though it might get there) but if you want to see TS pics from a photographer with talent who takes some time and trouble over her work, check out Nicole Montero from Latina Tranny. At least she tries.
Mac I have to disagree (or maybe prevaricate is a better word) on some of your points. I see the distinction you are describing in the quality of these Russian photos, and do appreciate it. They are beautiful. But sometimes the rough, amateur looking stuff can be appealing because it seems so real. Almost like something one of your buddies shot. Like the shots from the Sunny D and Allanah parties in NY. They are not professional photos, but they have their own appeal in that they are more live and convey the "atmosphere".
That being said, the smooth professional stuff is equally appealing in a different way. I loved the pictures in this thread and I enjoyed your comments on them.
Mike,Quote:
Originally Posted by mikejones
I have no issues at all with the pix from the Sunny D parties. They're not pretending to be anything other than what they are, just casual snaps at a party. That's great. I have nothing against girls' snaps of themselves with their mobile phones or casual pics of girls in the street either. It's all quite honest, and I have no problems with honesty.
There's always room for the candid snaps and I like a lot of them. Here's a great wee snap taken by the poolside of two lovely girls fooling around. I love that picture and the big cheeky grins on the girls.
Another example-- Hilda Brazil has posted a whole stack of pics of herself just out being casual, and if some are a wee bit iffy technically, so what? Gives us a view on her life we wouldn't otherwise have. You can't have a pro photog trailing around after you all the time. I am not saying all pix have to be pro pix.
What I do really object to is the relentless flow of crap pictures taken in horrible motels with wideangle lenses and on-camera flash by people who pretend they are photographers, which are then touted (and sold) as "glamour." They're not, they're just crap.
If you want to see great glamour porn, check out some of Viv Thomas' stuff. Unfortunately he doesn't do TG, apparently.
mikejones, MacShreach is absolutely right. I relish
looking at the photos of Sunny D and Allanah parties in NY but the difference is there are not trying to charge us £20 to look at them.
IMO most(ok a lot) of producers T-Girl porn & websites, aren’t professional, They are just jumpt up hobbyist. If they want to charge professional $$$ for their websites & DVD’s Then hire professionals, instead of a mate who went to night school for a week.
I don't care if they're real or not, they're hot and this was one of the best threads up in here. Thank you!
Are there even TS clubs in Russia?
I don't buy it. I don't even want to, lol. These girls will haunt my dreams forever if they turn out to be real :? hahaha
most if not all of these look fake to me