Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
giovanni_hotel
ALL tgirl consumers judge girls on their LOOKS. All porn consumers judge actors on their appearance. Is this a suddenly a new concept??
No - that's exactly the concept. What Franklin can't get into his noggin is that different consumers find different models attractive. While he puts Hazel Tucker at the top of this list (or near) there are many who just don't find her that attractive and have others much higher, regardless of what Franklin judges them on,
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FRANKLIN
However, consumers want the best looking models. There is nothing wrong with wanting the best girls like Hazel Tuker, Kimber James, Eva Lin, and Sarina Valentina. They're who many consumers want to see featured on every site.
One consumers best looking model might not be another. Why can't you get that into your thick head?
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FRANKLIN
Wait you have a degree in marketing....................oh great. Market and Business degrees are known to do worst than every other major in business.
I'm a business/marketing major too, dick. Talented people work regardless of the success rate of their degree.
~BB~
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
buckjohnson
And Franklin, play fair. You should never mock a person's journey. You are being ornery for just cause... respect a person accomplishment and appreciate a person's effort.
I wasn't mocking her. Most people with business and marketing degrees do worst in business than other people with other degrees. It has a lot to do with how those two majors are taught.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
seanchai
Name ONE that has appeared on other sites but not on Grooby sites as I can't think of any.
Until this year Star was one of them.
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
seanchai
No - that's exactly the concept. What Franklin can't get into his noggin is that different consumers find different models attractive. While he puts Hazel Tucker at the top of this list (or near) there are many who just don't find her that attractive and have others much higher, regardless of what Franklin judges them on,
Quote:
Originally Posted by
seanchai
One consumers best looking model might not be another. Why can't you get that into your thick head?
You still don't get. Peope are unique, and I understand people have different tastes. However, you must realize social standards for attractiveness. Hazel fits the bill under social standards. Most of your models do are up to social standards.
However, something is clearly wrong in the TS porn business when the most popular girls do not appear on other sites, but their own. In the past 3 years Kimber James has been booked only twice by two different companies, Devil's Films and TS Playground. Since coming back with full force Vanitty has only appeared in hardcore scenes for Kink and Evil Angels. As I stated before you were so wrong about Yasmin Lee. In the past two years she also worked with Evil Angels and Devil's Films.
You do not see this problem in straight porn. The top girls in straight porn are shoot and promoted on most sites. The best sites shoot the best and most popular girls.
If Grooby is truly the best then why is it having such a terrible time shooting the most popular Tgirls?
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KellyShore
But many girls are ts..would you not of considered Domino a ts? She just recently had implants? Many girls start porn to afford transition and become total knockouts as their career goes on.
Domino was a knockout way before she had implants...implants have nothing to do with being feminine...a lot of GG's have little if any breast size but are still very feminine.
Domino was ALWAYS fem, and I can say the same about a lot of the girls who started without implants...they just have "it"...a femininity that's obvious and undeniable.
Moving on, let me say my thoughts on what "belongs" on a site is strictly up to the businessperson who's running the site. No business, even Apple, can create product that everyone is going to like (and buy). There's always going to be negative feedback...it's up to the people who run the business to figure out how to create enough product (and demand) so as to keep that business going.
That being said, look at the popularity of the Sissy/TV/CD thread on what is nominally considered to be a forum dedicated to TS...there obviously is a demand there and if I were running a TS site as a business, I would include product in this vein.
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FRANKLIN
Until this year Star was one of them.
So that would be "I cannot" ?
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FRANKLIN
If Grooby is truly the best then why is it having such a terrible time shooting the most popular Tgirls?
You're still a fucking idiot and not listening. How are we having a difficult time shooting the most popular tgirls? We've got the most popular tgirls and continue to work with them. There are always going to be a few girls whom either by preference, budget or contracts aren't going to work for every company - but we shoot the most popular tgirls. Why don't you stick to the point (the point being you're wrong) instead of constantly pulling inaccurate facts out of your ass?
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FRANKLIN
However, you must realize social standards for attractiveness. Hazel fits the bill under social standards. Most of your models do are up to social standards.
Irrelevant what "social standards" are (whose society?) - Hazel does not fall under a classic beauty anyway (and I'm not going to start picking out why). What is relevant is what people want and what sells. End of story. You are incorrect.
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FRANKLIN
However, something is clearly wrong in the TS porn business when the most popular girls do not appear on other sites, but their own. In the past 3 years Kimber James has been booked only twice by two different companies, Devil's Films and TS Playground. Since coming back with full force Vanitty has only appeared in hardcore scenes for Kink and Evil Angels. As I stated before you were so wrong about Yasmin Lee. In the past two years she also worked with Evil Angels and Devil's Films.
There is nothing wrong with that. Many of the girls simply choose not to that much work, some are just too difficult to work with and some have different agendas. You've mentioned 3 models out of 100's.