-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Prospero
Quite rightly so, Russtafa. I note your totalitarian temptation runs in a different direction.
yes rightly so.the same go's for Zimbabwe now with it's torture and enslavement of it's people but nothing is said "???
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Maybe nothing is said in Australia - but plenty is said in the UK. However we re not going to invade because there re no geopolitical motives - or economic ones. Plus the rest of Africa wold simply see us as the imperialists back in action.
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Prospero
Maybe nothing is said in Australia - but plenty is said in the UK. However we re not going to invade because there re no geopolitical motives - or economic ones. Plus the rest of Africa wold simply see us as the imperialists back in action.
so what are these dickheads doing in Africa sit on their collective arse and look at the misery:(
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
I assume you refer to the other African nations and their leaders? I think - or suspect - that his hard won anti-colonialist credentials still command some respect, that the notion of human rights isn;t as ingrained in some of the African nations who could intervene (South Africa) and that to attack a fellow leader of an african nation would be seen as responding to a West still seen as somewhat imperalist or neo-colonialist. Hence Niger giving sanctuary to Gaddafi supporters and, possibly the man himself.
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Mugabe represents, like Qadhafi (who is the 'King of Kings of Africa' [!!]) an Africa that is passing as this generation of 'revolutionaries' and 'guerillas' die out.
There are some areas of deep concern, of which the horn of Africa reaching into northern Kenya is failing to deal with persistent drought and the scramble for depleted resources; while parts of the south-eastern Congo remain impervious to decency. Indeed, Mugabe and his generals have profited from their 'covert' intervention there, mostly to stuff their pockets with diamonds; exposing as a worthless lie Mugabe's claims not to have acted like the 'British Imperialists' intervening in counties for personal gain.
Elsewhere in Africa, there are signs that a new generation of Africans isn't that interested in Imperialism, Colonialism and all that stuff about struggle -those who were victims of local wars didn't see much related to colonial rule, just thieves and bandits out for what they could get. Nevertheless, Africans are dynamic, business-oriented; they want mobile phones and education, they want to travel, to run their own lives, to be successful; and for that reason the link below indicates where those who think positively about Africa see their future. Sirleaf Johnson's intro is rosy, there are issues to deal with -transparency in the oil producing countries of the West African Margin; the long-term impact of land-sales/leases to China, the Emirates and Russia; but as she says, Africa in general is a rich continent poorly managed. A well-placed Angolan told me a couple of years ago, candidly, that it would take 25 years for Angola to get over its civil war and properly develop; in some cases change can be fast; in regard to attitudes it can be agonisingly slow.
http://www.cgdev.org/doc/books/Emerg...ntro-FINAL.pdf
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stavros
Mugabe represents, like Qadhafi (who is the 'King of Kings of Africa' [!!]) an Africa that is passing as this generation of 'revolutionaries' and 'guerillas' die out.
There are some areas of deep concern, of which the horn of Africa reaching into northern Kenya is failing to deal with persistent drought and the scramble for depleted resources; while parts of the south-eastern Congo remain impervious to decency. Indeed, Mugabe and his generals have profited from their 'covert' intervention there, mostly to stuff their pockets with diamonds; exposing as a worthless lie Mugabe's claims not to have acted like the 'British Imperialists' intervening in counties for personal gain.
Elsewhere in Africa, there are signs that a new generation of Africans isn't that interested in Imperialism, Colonialism and all that stuff about struggle -those who were victims of local wars didn't see much related to colonial rule, just thieves and bandits out for what they could get. Nevertheless, Africans are dynamic, business-oriented; they want mobile phones and education, they want to travel, to run their own lives, to be successful; and for that reason the link below indicates where those who think positively about Africa see their future. Sirleaf Johnson's intro
is rosy, there
are issues to deal with -transparency in the oil producing countries of the West African Margin; the long-term impact of land-sales/leases to China, the Emirates and Russia; but as she says, Africa in general is a rich continent poorly managed. A well-placed Angolan told me a couple of years ago, candidly, that it would take 25 years for Angola to get over its civil war and properly develop; in some cases change can be fast; in regard to attitudes it can be agonisingly slow.
http://www.cgdev.org/doc/books/Emerg...ntro-FINAL.pdf
so you are thinking 25 years or a hundred?
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Russtafa -in some places less than 25 years, in others longer -its hard to say because the variables that can make it work or fail are in a delicate balance. Africans are better educated than they were 25 years ago; they have access to more capital for investment, and are keen to use it; their markets are more robust than they were and attracting more inward investment than was the case before -change doesn't happen overnight, but the image of Africa as a continent blighted by corruption and disease and nothing else is false. Sure there are problems of corruption -the UK is not immune from it, and at the highest levels of society-; they have diseases -so do we-; and they have unemployment -and so do we!
Sometimes a bit of optimism can make the day go more smoothly, you cant surely be in a bad mood all the time -? And that's without the Rugby...
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Quote:
you cant surely be in a bad mood all the time -?
One would think so, but these guys train real hard. There's special depression seminars & whatnot. It's a skilled crraft.
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stavros
Russtafa -in some places less than 25 years, in others longer -its hard to say because the variables that can make it work or fail are in a delicate balance. Africans are better educated than they were 25 years ago; they have access to more capital for investment, and are keen to use it; their markets are more robust than they were and attracting more inward investment than was the case before -change doesn't happen overnight, but the image of Africa as a continent blighted by corruption and disease and nothing else is false. Sure there are problems of corruption -the UK is not immune from it, and at the highest levels of society-; they have diseases -so do we-; and they have unemployment -and so do we!
Sometimes a bit of optimism can make the day go more smoothly, you cant surely be in a bad mood all the time -? And that's without the Rugby...
i am in a good mood we are doing very well so far in the rugby,Scotland and England seem to be struggling
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Prospero
Perry comatose... surely not. I think comos is short for commuters.
Commuters. HA! Sheeple. :lol:
Weeds intro Season 1 original good quality - YouTube
~BB~
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by
russtafa
i am in a good mood we are doing very well so far in the rugby,Scotland and England seem to be struggling
You know who I want to win the thing.:cheers:
http://www.australian-flag.org/australian-flag-640.jpg
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
cheers mate, go the wallabies
-
2 Attachment(s)
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
The liberal mind's Playbook & flow chart
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Nice.
A Glenn Beck flow chart.
Makes you look really smart.
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Erika1487
The liberal mind's Playbook & flow chart
wow i always wondered if they had a plan or is it just a chaotic mess so now we know it's a plan that's a chaotic mess:)
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Erika1487
The liberal mind's Playbook & flow chart
Spot on Erika, the only thing left out is "be sure to hate anyone that disagrees with your position".
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
That chart is utterly inane....
To pick up on just one half-assed assertion that those who embrace multiculturalism believe that" all cultures are to be respected except Western culture which is uniquely bad." An allegation thrown at liberals which is totally without foundation from the Glen Beck school of asinine prejudice and Goebbelspeak.
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
The chart falls apart from the start. Leaving aside the arcane notion that Lenin was not a Marxist (because his understanding of Marx's critique of capitalism was as faulty as his own spurious The Development of Capitalism in Russia [1899]); the idea that revolutionary agitators either wait for the masses to revolt or for the capitalist system to fall apart is simply wrong.
Thus, the Bolsheviks seized power in October 1917 and used their superior form of organisation to take control of the chaotic conditions that prevailed in the main urban areas of Russia, having made various attempts to 'rouse the workers from their slumber' since the failed revolution of 1905. This is a complex history because it involves the leadership skills of Lenin and Trotsky as much as the failure of the liberal groups in Russia, initially led by Kerensky, to achieve what the Bolsheviks did. Moreover, by the end of the civil war in 1923, the Bolsheviks had consolidated power and the Communist Party remained in control until 1991 -yes, it was a failure as an economic political and social system, but the revolutionary vanguard did succeed and not fail as the chart implies -the consequences of Leninism for the European left after 1917 were devastating -Spain alone being a grim example.
Another failure: China: From the countryside to the city encapsulated Mao's strategic perspective: build communism in the countryside by challenging landlords and corruption, by placing cadres in control of villages where they demonstrated their humility and honesty -a strategy that worked, the Communist Party is still in power in China whatever you think of the economy, and the way in which the rural cadres who were exemplary in the 1940s were replaced by cronyism and corruption, as happens with systems that don't change.
If the chart can't get basic history right, what is its point?
I don't see how Post-Modernism is connected to terrorism when post-modernism in its 'pure' form leads to atrophy and indifference not militant activity; Prospero's remark on multi-culturalism needs no further elaboration, and the chart makes a claim that its assumed alternative is in every way better without explaining how 'the richest country in the world' now counts 1 in 6 people as poor: if capitalism is so successful, how is this success to be measured?
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Wow, really compelling argument, Erika. Don't strain yourself hitting copy & paste. Just drink the Kool-aid and pass it on.
And in case you weren't paying attention, capitalism DID collapse in September 2008 and had to be bailed out by government.
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
;)wow you sure did stir up a cloud of flies with that one
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Well since we are putting simplistic pics on here, I might as well get in on it.
http://dangerousintersection.org/wp-...ain-lo-res.jpg
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Erika1487
The liberal mind's Playbook & flow chart
What a simplistic load of horse manure.
Thanks for reflecting what a dumb ass I am for expressing anything about this area of my thoughts here.
Clever? Anywhere near smart? Nope.
Ultra Stupid? Immature and hypocritical? Yep....
I was under the impression this is a sex and lifestyle forum...
Instead I find a ton of lonely heart red neck hucksters...
Best part of the 1st amendment is individuals unwittingly reveal their shallow adolescent intellect.
Thanks.
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
god bless Australian we hate all this socialist rubbish,our prime minister is only polling 23 percent ,the lowest in our history
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Silcc, that there is some funny shit..
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silcc69
Well since we are putting simplistic pics on here, I might as well get in on it.
LMAO! Hilarious but disturbingly accurate...
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
i like Obama he home brews beer
-
2 Attachment(s)
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stavros
The chart falls apart from the start. Leaving aside the arcane notion that Lenin was not a Marxist (because his understanding of Marx's critique of capitalism was as faulty as his own spurious The Development of Capitalism in Russia [1899]); the idea that revolutionary agitators either wait for the masses to revolt or for the capitalist system to fall apart is simply wrong.
Thus, the Bolsheviks seized power in October 1917 and used their superior form of organisation to take control of the chaotic conditions that prevailed in the main urban areas of Russia, having made various attempts to 'rouse the workers from their slumber' since the failed revolution of 1905. This is a complex history because it involves the leadership skills of Lenin and Trotsky as much as the failure of the liberal groups in Russia, initially led by Kerensky, to achieve what the Bolsheviks did. Moreover, by the end of the civil war in 1923, the Bolsheviks had consolidated power and the Communist Party remained in control until 1991 -yes, it was a failure as an economic political and social system, but the revolutionary vanguard did succeed and not fail as the chart implies -the consequences of Leninism for the European left after 1917 were devastating -Spain alone being a grim example.
Another failure: China: From the countryside to the city encapsulated Mao's strategic perspective: build communism in the countryside by challenging landlords and corruption, by placing cadres in control of villages where they demonstrated their humility and honesty -a strategy that worked, the Communist Party is still in power in China whatever you think of the economy, and the way in which the rural cadres who were exemplary in the 1940s were replaced by cronyism and corruption, as happens with systems that don't change.
If the chart can't get basic history right, what is its point?
I don't see how Post-Modernism is connected to terrorism when post-modernism in its 'pure' form leads to atrophy and indifference not militant activity; Prospero's remark on multi-culturalism needs no further elaboration, and the chart makes a claim that its assumed alternative is in every way better without explaining how 'the richest country in the world' now counts 1 in 6 people as poor: if capitalism is so successful, how is this success to be measured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Prospero
That chart is utterly inane....
To pick up on just one half-assed assertion that those who embrace multiculturalism believe that" all cultures are to be respected except Western culture which is uniquely bad." An allegation thrown at liberals which is totally without foundation from the Glen Beck school of asinine prejudice and Goebbelspeak.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BluegrassCat
Wow, really compelling argument, Erika. Don't strain yourself hitting copy & paste. Just drink the Kool-aid and pass it on.
And in case you weren't paying attention, capitalism DID collapse in September 2008 and had to be bailed out by government.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NaughtyJane
What a simplistic load of horse manure.
Thanks for reflecting what a dumb ass I am for expressing anything about this area of my thoughts here.
Clever? Anywhere near smart? Nope.
Ultra Stupid? Immature and hypocritical? Yep....
I was under the impression this is a sex and lifestyle forum...
Instead I find a ton of lonely heart red neck hucksters...
Best part of the 1st amendment is individuals unwittingly reveal their shallow adolescent intellect.
Thanks.
Well now that I have your attention........
Let me state this in very S....I.....M....P....L....E Layman's terms.
Liberalism & socialism are like canned tomatoes for instance at walmart they come in 15 different varieties and sizes, but the basic element, what lumps them all in the same isle of the
grocery store is that they are all canned tomatoes.
As most of you know I work for the Republican party by day, it's my job to throw all the canned tomatoes in the pot and make a damn good chili ;)
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Erika you are not just someone else with an opinion, you are an official representative of the Republican Party, as you keep reminding us. You offered a diagram/cartoon as a 'critique' of the left, but when challenged on its components, your response is not reasoned debate, but another diagram/cartoon which basically says 'I am right and that's all there is to it'. If you want to be taken seriously then why don't you give us some policy detail to justify your cause?
For example, do you think Governor Perry's job creation scheme that he says has worked in Texas, should be applied across the USA? Can you explain and justify it?
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Erika1487
Well now that I have your attention........
Let me state this in very S....I.....M....P....L....E Layman's terms.
Liberalism & socialism are like canned tomatoes for instance at walmart they come in 15 different varieties and sizes, but the basic element, what lumps them all in the same isle of the
grocery store is that they are all canned tomatoes.
As most of you know I work for the Republican party by day, it's my job to throw all the canned tomatoes in the pot and make a damn good chili ;)
Wow, you must be a real titan of politics. Has the Republican Party seen any of your porno movies?
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
I like your list :dancing:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Yvonne183
I have some ideas for names for this forum:
1-Assholes Anonymous
2-My TS is better than your TS
3-I suck dick but I am not gay. (my favorite name for forum)
4-I like shemales but I don't like the word shemale,,,duh?
5-Forum for very bored people
6-Hate is love
7-Experts Anonymous
8-Move along, nothing serious going on here
9-Only the passable
10-Only the braindead
11-Fools on the hill
12-What is the label I should use for myself
The title that is most funny to me is Hungangels,, who was the brainiac who thought up of the word "Angels".
PS- I have no response for the political section of this forum, the political section posts are just to bizarre that the posts are funny all by themselves and stand on their own stupidity.
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bobby Domino
I like your list :dancing:
yeah great aye
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bobby Domino
I like your list :dancing:
i think when they named the site It was at a time when Victoria's Secret was pumping their Angel's fashion show trip..... I always thought that whole thing with the wings was odd... but what do i know...
Hung Angels, such cachet... oh well.
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by
traLika
Wow, you must be a real titan of politics. Has the Republican Party seen any of your porno movies?
Yes but cans of tomatoes are not full of shit like the socialists.i don't mind a bit of socialism like public schools ,hospitals, but injecting rooms for junkies,state housing for criminals when they get out of jail,welfare payments for single mums,free housing for refugees and welfare payments for them because they will never have jobs,welfare for junkies because they are junkies,a stupid carbon tax,and teaching their socialist drivel in the schools,multiculturalism , the thing just seems to expand and is a great burden on society
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
I pay for my own drugs and clean up my own vomit. I even pay to drug a few ladies. I'm a Capitalist with a hollow leg.
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
good for you Dino you are a good citizen .hey mate don't fuck hookers with scabs or track marks or skull faces =that's my heath tip for the day
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by
russtafa
good for you Dino you are a good citizen .hey mate don't fuck hookers with scabs or track marks or skull faces =that's my heath tip for the day
A good citizen that can never walk a straight line.:cheers:
If I'm responsible for the scabs, track marks, and skull faces may I please resume my lovemaking?
-
Re: we should rename hung angels as the socialist angels lol
yes but watch out for any green muck that's leaking down her legs but i reckon you are quite discerning in your whore mongering