http://newsone.com/files/2010/03/jamiefoxx1.jpg
Printable View
Lafuckingwanda lol
Damn Nicole, that was so uncool. I had a moment of hysterical blindness after seeing that pic.
Actually, it does change every 10 years or so in the school system. I can look at what I learned, then what my 10 year younger brother learned, and then what my 20 year younger son learned. It has changed, rather drastically, during each period. A quick example would be that I was taught columbus was a hero, my brother was taught that he had some issues, and my son is taught that he was a perpetrator of genocide. I'm not debating which is true, just illustrating that it does change. Vietnam, Gulf War, Iraq War, and Afghanistan have/are all under going the same thing.
And yes the religious nuts are dangerous, but legalizing censorship is not the way to counter it.
BREAKING NEWS!: just in pictures from the glen beck rally
http://www.mythinglinks.org/HitlerPl...L~c~R50~TL.JPG
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_AuPoOCVtSz...azi+rally.jpeghttp://cache4.asset-cache.net/xc/829...8EF276EE96F458
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:9...0/10646424.jpghttp://www.corbisimages.com/images/6...4/NA007503.jpg
You're entitled to your own opinion, but ffs can't you do something other than spam the same photos over and over. Post an actual opinion or at least vary the type of pictures/vids lol. I feel like it's the 08 elections all over again when you were spamming the politics sections with endless threads containing the same stuff.
I'm opposed to European style censorship laws, which are all to prevalent on that continent. It's not that I wouldn't like to see some people stfu, it's that I don't want to hand the government that kind of power.
Have you lived in the US or visited it for any extended period of time? We have plenty of lunatics and retards, but it's not quite as drastic as you make it out to be. Urban/Suburban areas tend to have a large number of college educated people that generally reject that non-sense. Some of our states are more heavily populated than entire European nations, so it's kind of easy to look among us and find groups to shake you head at.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/29/op...me&ref=general
Old news really I spoze.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/..._art-popup.gif
Op-Ed Columnist
The Billionaires Bankrolling the Tea Party
By FRANK RICH
Published: August 28, 2010
ANOTHER weekend, another grass-roots demonstration starring Real Americans who are mad as hell and want to take back their country from you-know-who. Last Sunday the site was Lower Manhattan, where they jeered the “ground zero mosque.” This weekend, the scene shifted to Washington, where the avatars of oppressed white Tea Party America, Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin, were slated to “reclaim the civil rights movement” (Beck’s words) on the same spot where the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. had his dream exactly 47 years earlier.
Vive la révolution!
There’s just one element missing from these snapshots of America’s ostensibly spontaneous and leaderless populist uprising: the sugar daddies who are bankrolling it, and have been doing so since well before the “death panel” warm-up acts of last summer. Three heavy hitters rule. You’ve heard of one of them, Rupert Murdoch. The other two, the brothers David and Charles Koch, are even richer, with a combined wealth exceeded only by that of Bill Gates and Warren Buffett among Americans. But even those carrying the Kochs’ banner may not know who these brothers are.
Their self-interested and at times radical agendas, like Murdoch’s, go well beyond, and sometimes counter to, the interests of those who serve as spear carriers in the political pageants hawked on Fox News. The country will be in for quite a ride should these potentates gain power, and given the recession-battered electorate’s unchecked anger and the Obama White House’s unfocused political strategy, they might.
All three tycoons are the latest incarnation of what the historian Kim Phillips-Fein labeled “Invisible Hands” in her prescient 2009 book of that title: those corporate players who have financed the far right ever since the du Pont brothers spawned the American Liberty League in 1934 to bring down F.D.R. You can draw a straight line from the Liberty League’s crusade against the New Deal “socialism” of Social Security, the Securities and Exchange Commission and child labor laws to the John Birch Society-Barry Goldwater assault on J.F.K. and Medicare to the Koch-Murdoch-backed juggernaut against our “socialist” president.
Only the fat cats change — not their methods and not their pet bugaboos (taxes, corporate regulation, organized labor, and government “handouts” to the poor, unemployed, ill and elderly). Even the sources of their fortunes remain fairly constant. Koch Industries began with oil in the 1930s and now also spews an array of industrial products, from Dixie cups to Lycra, not unlike DuPont’s portfolio of paint and plastics. Sometimes the biological DNA persists as well. The Koch brothers’ father, Fred, was among the select group chosen to serve on the Birch Society’s top governing body. In a recorded 1963 speech that survives in a University of Michigan archive, he can be heard warning of “a takeover” of America in which Communists would “infiltrate the highest offices of government in the U.S. until the president is a Communist, unknown to the rest of us.” That rant could be delivered as is at any Tea Party rally today.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/...icleInline.jpg
Vive la révolution!
There’s just one element missing from these snapshots of America’s ostensibly spontaneous and leaderless populist uprising: the sugar daddies who are bankrolling it, and have been doing so since well before the “death panel” warm-up acts of last summer. Three heavy hitters rule. You’ve heard of one of them, Rupert Murdoch. The other two, the brothers David and Charles Koch, are even richer, with a combined wealth exceeded only by that of Bill Gates and Warren Buffett among Americans. But even those carrying the Kochs’ banner may not know who these brothers are.
Their self-interested and at times radical agendas, like Murdoch’s, go well beyond, and sometimes counter to, the interests of those who serve as spear carriers in the political pageants hawked on Fox News. The country will be in for quite a ride should these potentates gain power, and given the recession-battered electorate’s unchecked anger and the Obama White House’s unfocused political strategy, they might.
All three tycoons are the latest incarnation of what the historian Kim Phillips-Fein labeled “Invisible Hands” in her prescient 2009 book of that title: those corporate players who have financed the far right ever since the du Pont brothers spawned the American Liberty League in 1934 to bring down F.D.R. You can draw a straight line from the Liberty League’s crusade against the New Deal “socialism” of Social Security, the Securities and Exchange Commission and child labor laws to the John Birch Society-Barry Goldwater assault on J.F.K. and Medicare to the Koch-Murdoch-backed juggernaut against our “socialist” president.
Only the fat cats change — not their methods and not their pet bugaboos (taxes, corporate regulation, organized labor, and government “handouts” to the poor, unemployed, ill and elderly). Even the sources of their fortunes remain fairly constant. Koch Industries began with oil in the 1930s and now also spews an array of industrial products, from Dixie cups to Lycra, not unlike DuPont’s portfolio of paint and plastics. Sometimes the biological DNA persists as well. The Koch brothers’ father, Fred, was among the select group chosen to serve on the Birch Society’s top governing body. In a recorded 1963 speech that survives in a University of Michigan archive, he can be heard warning of “a takeover” of America in which Communists would “infiltrate the highest offices of government in the U.S. until the president is a Communist, unknown to the rest of us.” That rant could be delivered as is at any Tea Party rally today.
Last week the Kochs were shoved unwillingly into the spotlight by the most comprehensive journalistic portrait of them yet, written by Jane Mayer of The New Yorker.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/29/op...me&ref=general
Honk if you think tsbrenda is a retard on crack. lol
I had to close my window. Suddenly there's all this honking going on; almost like a traffic jam on the way to the rubber mask factory.
lol
I found arianne's aka nicole dupre updated photo
I found arianne's aka nicole dupre updated photo
the resemblance is uncanny
don't you think?
http://spiritwaterblood.com/wp-conte...ads/corpse.jpg
This thread is turning into a comedy gold mine
Come up with something new, you illiterate Buffalo Bill. This shit is STALE, OLD, LATE, and TIRED.
YouTube- Best performance - Ted Levine
any u really think your nigger OBAMA is good?
everyone should complain to the mod
You generally seem fairly reasonable, but I don't think you have the history quite right here. The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, of which TARP was a significant portion, was passed by the House on October 3, 2008 and signed into law by former President Bush. It was initially rejected by the House on September 29, causing the Dow to tank 700 points. So the Senate dumped its version and simply amended an earlier version that the House had already passed. HR 1424 passed 263-171; 91 House Republicans voted in favor of it, including such right-wing luminaries as John Boehner, Eric Cantor, Paul Ryan, John Shadegg, etc. Former President Bush signed the bill into law mere hours later.
It's tough to find the first mention of Tea Party rallies, but my distinct recollection is that they came into being during the spring and summer of 2009 as part of the insanity of the Health Care Reform debate.
A lot of people confuse the bank bailouts -- TARP -- with the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, which was passed by the 111th Congress and signed into law by President Obama. But ARRA did not contain any bank bailouts and in fact repealed a tax credit enjoyed by large banking conglomerates.
while i agree that glenn beck is a nazi and i agree with the posting, using the term "retard" does nothing to promote the message. we all slip up at times, Obama did it on the tonight show with his "special olympic" comment. Think about how you would feel if you had a mentally challenged child and home and you heard someone putting them in the same category as baby killer soldiers. and also don't forget that most "hos" are teenage runaways or sex slaves and most "bums" have their own sad story.