There’s the assumption again. I’m not touting my masculinity. Just asking a question on something I’ve noticed on this site.Quote:
Originally Posted by broncofan
Printable View
There’s the assumption again. I’m not touting my masculinity. Just asking a question on something I’ve noticed on this site.Quote:
Originally Posted by broncofan
Wow you went so far as to look up my info on my profile. Why??? What were you hoping to find. Just to start more shit right??? now that’s juvenile. Also This post is geared towards other posts I’ve seen talking about Sean Michaels and other members on the post. Did you ever think of that???Quote:
Originally Posted by filghy2
Well that didn't last long. You know the more you keep responding, the more laughably pathetic your repeated claims not to care too much about this look.Quote:
Originally Posted by timetoplay2468
Self-awareness really isn't your strong suit, is it.
Thanks for the reading material. I did notice that but I didn't take it sincerely because he almost makes it sound like he decided to be a top because it's affirming to ts women. Obviously if he's a top it's because that's what he likes. Then there was the weird stuff about touching the penis to provide a "helping hand", as though he needed to say it's for them not him. I'm surprised he didn't say he closes his eyes when he does it.Quote:
Originally Posted by filghy2
The idea about him really respecting ts women and others being fetishists is there as you say, and I think it and the masculinity stuff is self-justification. I don't understand the hierarchies people try to create around sex. Like what you like. Find someone you're compatible with and who likes you. That's it.
You couldn't have noticed something that didn't happen. The person who agreed with you is Mr. Fanti. I have no other comments about that.Quote:
Originally Posted by timetoplay2468
All that weird extraneous stuff about the appeal of masculinity and other people's inferior likes was what exactly? Do you even lift bro?:)
Actually, there's quite a few top-only guys on this forum who feel the need to justify their preferences in those terms, though they are not usually as extreme as this guy. I think there's pretty clear reason why some TS admirers feel the need to differentiate themselves from others. But obviously saying that is just further evidence of the conspiracy to shame top-only guys.Quote:
Originally Posted by broncofan
IndeedQuote:
Originally Posted by timetoplay2468
Still waiting on examples of this evidence...Quote:
Originally Posted by timetoplay2468
As I've already said, I'm one of your alleged hated minority on here. I don't know how the others of us feel, but did it ever occur to you that I don't need white knighting and am perfectly capable speaking up for myself should the need ever arise, which it never has.Quote:
Originally Posted by timetoplay2468
Don't try to speak on other peoples behalf when you haven't a clue, take your "research material" from fiction and porn, and can't form a coherent, consistent argument...
It's been said many times before on here, which if you'd done your research properly you'd know, that this site doesn't always exactly represent the reality of the wider trans community. It's a porn forum after all...Quote:
Originally Posted by timetoplay2468
I've never felt the need to justify my preferences, but did often take the time to point them out when writing reviews. Usually to help prevent readers from wasting their time. Basically a warning that if you're a bottom this review will be of limited use to you.Quote:
Originally Posted by filghy2
To be clear, I have no objection to people expressing their preferences. My objection is to those who can only do so by putting down others in comparison. It's telling that our antagonist has spent very little time talking about what he likes and a lot of time worrying about what other people like.Quote:
Originally Posted by Laphroaig
I've never bottomed before. I don't hate any guy who's into that or sucking dick. I think I remember seeing threads mentioning hate towards actors like Christian XXX and Ramon a while ago. That they are not involved enough or something. Christian has but Ramon has never bottomed. I can't see Ramon being a bottom. I don't think they are doing a bad job. I think some fans may be jealous. I imagine it's not easy to be a pornstar. And the ones who don't are probably not into being topped. Or maybe the girl isn't for that scene, who knows. But I'm sure there are guys/ fans who want to see it all in movies, dominating woman and being dominated at the same time. And that's probably where the hate comes from. Fans want to see their fantasy acted out. Outside of porn people will always judge you for being into what they aren't into. Everyone is different. But when it comes to transgender woman a lot of guys lie about their attraction. Just look at these rappers getting caught up these days. Especially the one from SoCal who tried to hookup with Nikita Dragun. OP mentioned something about liking transgenders to cover up being gay. IMO men who are attracted to transgenders aren't gay. This is my opinion. Maybe there are guys who will say that's gay out of fear, but we all know a good majority of men are attracted to transgenders. Not all, but a great majority. I was never attracted to men and never will be. But I could never hate someone who is. But my attraction to trans woman is really recent. Before that it never crossed my mine. Where I live there are many hispanic transgenders, and I recently started to notice them. From there it lead to transgender porn then dating. And then an attraction to big asses. Everyone's story is different just as their preference is. If guys want to top only let them do their thing. Bottom only, let them. Both, knock yourself out.
Thanks ACarrera! Like & agree with what you wrote here! You pretty much said what I feel on this subject.
i have not bottomed or topped but maybe someday I will. Just Love shemales!
Flighty does his research. He can tell me things I said 6 months ago, and he will too, if I ever appear to contradict myself. I have not decided yet if this is because Flighty has way too much time on his hands, takes these conversations way too seriously, or if he simply has an extremely good memory and isn't afraid to use it. In any case, he keeps people honest around here.Quote:
Originally Posted by timetoplay2468
I've been looking into this alleged conspiracy. Most people are unaware that the media they consume daily, in the form of news and entertainment, is essentially dished out by 6 people. Those people are Sumner Redstone, Bob Iger, Jeff Bewkes, Brian L. Roberts, Rupert Murdoch, and Kazuo Hirai - the CEO's of the 6 corporations that own 95% of Western Civilization's media outlets.Quote:
Originally Posted by filghy2
If there is indeed a conspiracy to shame top-only men, one or more of these guys is behind it.
So I got with my buds on the dark web and checked on their sexual preferences:
Sumner Redstone - A gay pedophile, only likes boys younger than 8, but is a top.
Bob Iger - A cuckold, hires BBC's to fuck his wife while he masturbates, can only cum when his wife is giving him the finger as she moans in ecstasy and a huge black cock hammers her in the asshole. However, when he actually does some fucking, he's a top.
Jeff Bewkes - A virgin with a micro-penis so small it is nearly inverted.
Brian L. Roberts - Strictly a sadist. And a top. With an 11-inch trouser monster. Fucks to kill.
Rupert Murdoch - Here's our most likely top-hater. He's been bottoming since he accidentally jumped on a seatless bicycle at age 11. Frequently hosts Train Parties where he is the only caboose.
Kazuo Hirai - Strictly vomit porn.
So I think Murdoch is our guy, and further research shows that Fox News has recently featured stories entitled "How to Prepare Your Colon For Sex" and "Buttfuckers - What's To Love?" - http://tinyurl.com/http-www-foxnews-com-us-how
You don't need the dark web to uncover unsavoury facts about phone hacking soft-porn publisher Rupert Murdoch. When his UK 'newspaper' The Sun printed topless models on Page 3 the ages of the models ranged from 16 upwards. One of the most famous 16-year olds who had a career as model and pop singer is Samantha Fox -the headline when she appeared on Page 3 was 'Sam, 16, Quits A-Levels for Ooh-Levels'.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Danger
Problem for Murdoch is that 16 makes this underage porn in rather a lot of states in Rupert Murdoch's country, the USA, not that he cares. The law was changed in 2003, the Sexual Offences Act making it illegal to publish photos of models under the age of 18.
No problem, It's equally telling that the OP has yet to provide any valid examples of this hatred of tops on here, whether from the General section, or the Stories, where the evidence allegedly resides. The best he's managed to dig up so far is Ramon, who seems to be generally disliked as a performer anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by filghy2
I do have a pretty good memory Nick. I had a hunch that our concerned citizen joined this site just to vent about his hobby horse and I was right. His very first post was to start another thread on this same topic. It doesn't take a lot of effort to check the posting history of someone who's made only 20 or so posts.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Danger
Perhaps I do have too much time on my hands, but I actually like debating as form of entertainment.
OK I'm back on this forum after quite some time away, and this is the weirdest thread I've ever seen! lol wtf?! :)
I guess you haven't caught up with BostonBad's threads yetQuote:
Originally Posted by eric_x99
http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/sho...en-Good-to-eat
http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/sho...ze-b4-anal-sex
Bostonbad is a mere amateur compared to these two classic threads from jamesedwards and holzz...Quote:
Originally Posted by filghy2
http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/sho...m-from-the-ass
http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/sho...?101391-better
The weirdest but also funniest part of that thread was some guy named gugaxamot offering an unusual level of support for James' weird posts. Stuff like "James posts beautiful things" or "you just don't understand the beauty he has to share with the world." Those aren't real quotes but it was odd.Quote:
Originally Posted by Laphroaig
Don't forget about who produces the most semen!Quote:
Originally Posted by filghy2
Thank you for your kind words Filghty2.
Back to the conversation.
Sometimes I top sometimes bottom.
But when you work all week, you're tired out and u just want to do almost nothing and have fun there is nothing like laying on ur back.
I like my ankles near my ears and a hot hung ts bouncing down over and over again so hard I can feel my insides shake. The best time I had been fucked went down like that 20 min after a glass of wine and 1/4 bottle of Robitussin was butt chugged. It settled me down, I could relax.
This was the famous quote.Quote:
Originally Posted by broncofan
Quote:
Originally Posted by gugaxamot
That reminds me of another guy who loves to use the word 'beautiful' in odd contexts.
https://qz.com/1086942/21-unexpected...are-beautiful/
Do you actually manage to hold down a steady job? You've already told us that you spend half the day thinking about your obsession, which doesn't make you sound like the ideal employee.Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonBad
I am talented while actually working. So that gives me 1/2 the day to think about semen, cocks and ts women..
After she made my insides shake she jammed her cock down my throat as deep as she could with no regard for me and cummed. I couldnt really taste it but felt it squirting deep down my throat.Quote:
Originally Posted by filghy2
Oh dear, daydreaming at work again...:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonBad
Burgers don't serve themselves...
If I ever go to Boston again I think I'll stay away from the burgersQuote:
Originally Posted by Laphroaig
BostonBadBurgers... :dead-1:Quote:
Originally Posted by filghy2
What about Whalburgers?Quote:
Originally Posted by Laphroaig
You don't want a cumburger?Quote:
Originally Posted by filghy2